Background: Both public health, and the health of the natural environment, are affected by policy decisions made across portfolios as diverse as finance, planning, transport, housing, education, and agriculture. A response to the interdependent character of public health has been the “health in all policies” (HiAP) approach.
Objectives: With reference to parallels between health and environment, this paper argues that lessons from HiAP are useful for creating a new integrated environmental management approach termed “environment in all polices” (EiAP).
Discussion: This paper covers the theoretical foundations of HiAP, which is based on an understanding that health is strongly socially determined. The paper then highlights how lessons learned from HiAP’s implementation in Finland, California, and South Australia might be applied to EiAP. It is too early to learn from evaluations of HiAP, but it is apparent that there is no single tool kit for its application. The properties that are likely to be necessary for an effective EiAP approach include a jurisdiction-specific approach, ongoing and strong leadership from a central agency, independent analysis, and a champion. We then apply these properties to Victoria (Australia) to demonstrate how EiAP might work.
Conclusions: We encourage further exploration of the feasibility of EiAP as an approach that could make explicit the sometimes surprising environmental implications of a whole range of strategic policies.
1McCaughey VicHealth Community Wellbeing Unit, Centre for Health Equity, School of Population and Global Health, and 2School of Geography, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
Recommended Citation:
Geoffrey R. Browne1,Ian D. Rutherfurd2. The Case for “Environment in All Policies”: Lessons from the “Health in All Policies” Approach in Public Health[J]. Environmental Health Perspectives,2017-01-01,Volume 125(Issue 2):149