globalchange  > 气候变化事实与影响
DOI: 10.1289/EHP426
论文题名:
Relative Contributions of Agricultural Drift, Para-Occupational, and Residential Use Exposure Pathways to House Dust Pesticide Concentrations: Meta-Regression of Published Data
作者: Nicole C. Deziel; 1; 2 Laura E. Beane Freeman; 1 Barry I. Graubard; 1 Rena R. Jones; 1 Jane A. Hoppin; 3 Kent Thomas; 4 Cynthia J. Hines; 5 Aaron Blair; 1 Dale P. S; ler; 6 Honglei Chen; 6 Jay H. Lubin; 1 Gabriella; reotti; 1 Michael C. R. Alavanja; 1; Melissa C. Friesen1
刊名: Environmental Health Perspectives
ISSN: 0091-6811
出版年: 2017
卷: Volume 125, 期:Issue 3
起始页码: 296
语种: 英语
英文摘要: Background: Increased pesticide concentrations in house dust in agricultural areas have been attributed to several exposure pathways, including agricultural drift, para-occupational, and residential use.

Objective: To guide future exposure assessment efforts, we quantified relative contributions of these pathways using meta-regression models of published data on dust pesticide concentrations.

Methods: From studies in North American agricultural areas published from 1995 to 2015, we abstracted dust pesticide concentrations reported as summary statistics [e.g., geometric means (GM)]. We analyzed these data using mixed-effects meta-regression models that weighted each summary statistic by its inverse variance. Dependent variables were either the log-transformed GM (drift) or the log-transformed ratio of GMs from two groups (para-occupational, residential use).

Results: For the drift pathway, predicted GMs decreased sharply and nonlinearly, with GMs 64% lower in homes 250 m versus 23 m from fields (interquartile range of published data) based on 52 statistics from seven studies. For the para-occupational pathway, GMs were 2.3 times higher [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.5, 3.3; 15 statistics, five studies] in homes of farmers who applied pesticides more recently or frequently versus less recently or frequently. For the residential use pathway, GMs were 1.3 (95% CI: 1.1, 1.4) and 1.5 (95% CI: 1.2, 1.9) times higher in treated versus untreated homes, when the probability that a pesticide was used for the pest treatment was 1–19% and ≥ 20%, respectively (88 statistics, five studies).

Conclusion: Our quantification of the relative contributions of pesticide exposure pathways in agricultural populations could improve exposure assessments in epidemiologic studies. The meta-regression models can be updated when additional data become available.
URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/EHP426
Citation statistics:
资源类型: 期刊论文
标识符: http://119.78.100.158/handle/2HF3EXSE/12142
Appears in Collections:气候变化事实与影响
气候变化与战略

Files in This Item: Download All
File Name/ File Size Content Type Version Access License
EHP426.alt.pdf(248KB)期刊论文作者接受稿开放获取View Download

作者单位: 1Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Department of Human Health and Services, Bethesda, Maryland, USA; 2Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Yale School of Public Health, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA; 3Department of Biological Sciences, Center for Human Health and the Environment, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA; 4National Exposure Research Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA; 5Division of Surveillance, Hazard Evaluations and Field Studies, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA; 6Epidemiology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA

Recommended Citation:
Nicole C. Deziel,1,2 Laura E. Beane Freeman,et al. Relative Contributions of Agricultural Drift, Para-Occupational, and Residential Use Exposure Pathways to House Dust Pesticide Concentrations: Meta-Regression of Published Data[J]. Environmental Health Perspectives,2017-01-01,Volume 125(Issue 3):296
Service
Recommend this item
Sava as my favorate item
Show this item's statistics
Export Endnote File
Google Scholar
Similar articles in Google Scholar
[Nicole C. Deziel]'s Articles
[1]'s Articles
[2 Laura E. Beane Freeman]'s Articles
百度学术
Similar articles in Baidu Scholar
[Nicole C. Deziel]'s Articles
[1]'s Articles
[2 Laura E. Beane Freeman]'s Articles
CSDL cross search
Similar articles in CSDL Cross Search
[Nicole C. Deziel]‘s Articles
[1]‘s Articles
[2 Laura E. Beane Freeman]‘s Articles
Related Copyright Policies
Null
收藏/分享
文件名: EHP426.alt.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF
此文件暂不支持浏览
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

Items in IR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.