The general public is increasingly critical of extensive, ruminant-dominated systems for their attributed high greenhouse gas emissions. However, advocates of low input, grass-fed systems present them as paradigmatic sustainable production systems because of their biodiversity, land use, rural development and animal welfare benefits. We reconcile both analyses by proposing to assess baseline emissions in grazed ecosystems. We show that policies aiming at transitioning grass-fed systems towards fodder-based (concentrate- or grain-based) systems can be ineffective at reducing emissions because wild ruminants or termites fill livestock's ecological niche. Climate change policies targeting livestock should carefully evaluate derived emissions scenarios.
1.Int Union Conservat Nat, Commiss Ecosyst Management, POB 68200, Nairobi 00100, Kenya 2.Asociac Biomas, Madrid 28028, Spain 3.Univ Alberta, Alberta Biodivers Monitoring Inst, CW 405 Biol Sci Bldg, Edmonton, AB T6G 2E9, Canada 4.InnoTech Alberta, 250 Karl Clark Rd, Edmonton, AB T6N 1E4, Canada
Recommended Citation:
Manzano, P.,White, S. R.. Intensifying pastoralism may not reduce greenhouse gas emissions: wildlife-dominated landscape scenarios as a baseline in life-cycle analysis[J]. CLIMATE RESEARCH,2019-01-01,77(2):91-97