globalchange  > 气候减缓与适应
DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2018.09.017
WOS记录号: WOS:000457886400020
论文题名:
Uncovering attitudes towards carbon capture storage and utilization technologies in Germany: Insights into affective-cognitive evaluations of benefits and risks
作者: Linzenich, Anika; Arning, Katrin; Offermann-van Heek, Julia; Ziefle, Martina
通讯作者: Linzenich, Anika
刊名: ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE
ISSN: 2214-6296
EISSN: 2214-6326
出版年: 2019
卷: 48, 页码:205-218
语种: 英语
英文关键词: Carbon capture & utilization (CCU) ; Carbon capture & storage (CCS) ; Public perception ; Affective-cognitive evaluation profiles
WOS关键词: PUBLIC ACCEPTANCE ; SOCIAL ACCEPTANCE ; DIOXIDE CAPTURE ; CO2 UTILIZATION ; FOCUS GROUPS ; PERCEPTION ; CCS ; UK ; PREFERENCES ; INNOVATION
WOS学科分类: Environmental Studies
WOS研究方向: Environmental Sciences & Ecology
英文摘要:

Carbon capture and storage (CCS) and carbon capture and utilization (CCU) are technologies which aim at mitigating climate change and saving fossil resources: CO2 emissions from industrial plants are captured and stored underground (CCS) or used for the manufacturing of products (CCU). In contrast to CCS, CCU is less about the reduction of CO2 emissions, since the global demand for feedstock CO2 to be used for CCU products is considerably lower than the CO2 emissions produced worldwide. Moreover, the CO2 is only temporarily stored until the disposal of the CCU products. Instead, a reduction of fossil resources in product manufacturing is the primary goal for CCU. The successful roll-out of CCS and CCU is not solely determined by technical feasibility but also depends on public acceptance. Research has shown that acceptance of energy technologies is impacted by laypersons' attitudes. So far, little is known about differences in affective and cognitive evaluations of CCU in comparison to CCS. To address this research gap, an online survey was conducted in Germany (n=449), in which affective and cognitive evaluation profiles for CCS and CCU were compared. Also, it was explored whether attitudes towards CCS are predictive of CCU acceptance. Results revealed basically similar evaluation profiles for CCS and CCU but CCU was rated significantly more positively. Comparing results for CCS supporters and opponents, it was found that CCS supporters rated CCU similarly positive whereas CCS opponents evaluated CCU significantly better than CCS. The findings can be used for communication concepts tailored to laypeople's requirements and concerns and yield implications for industrial policy-making.


Citation statistics:
资源类型: 期刊论文
标识符: http://119.78.100.158/handle/2HF3EXSE/128455
Appears in Collections:气候减缓与适应

Files in This Item:

There are no files associated with this item.


作者单位: Rhein Westfal TH Aachen, Chair Commun Sci, HCIC, Campus Blvd 57, D-52074 Aachen, Germany

Recommended Citation:
Linzenich, Anika,Arning, Katrin,Offermann-van Heek, Julia,et al. Uncovering attitudes towards carbon capture storage and utilization technologies in Germany: Insights into affective-cognitive evaluations of benefits and risks[J]. ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE,2019-01-01,48:205-218
Service
Recommend this item
Sava as my favorate item
Show this item's statistics
Export Endnote File
Google Scholar
Similar articles in Google Scholar
[Linzenich, Anika]'s Articles
[Arning, Katrin]'s Articles
[Offermann-van Heek, Julia]'s Articles
百度学术
Similar articles in Baidu Scholar
[Linzenich, Anika]'s Articles
[Arning, Katrin]'s Articles
[Offermann-van Heek, Julia]'s Articles
CSDL cross search
Similar articles in CSDL Cross Search
[Linzenich, Anika]‘s Articles
[Arning, Katrin]‘s Articles
[Offermann-van Heek, Julia]‘s Articles
Related Copyright Policies
Null
收藏/分享
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

Items in IR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.