globalchange  > 气候减缓与适应
DOI: 10.1002/hyp.13341
WOS记录号: WOS:000458700900006
论文题名:
Comparison of scenario-neutral approaches for estimation of climate change impacts on flood characteristics
作者: Keller, Luise1,2; Rossler, Ole1,2; Martius, Olivia1,2,3; Weingartner, Rolf1,2
通讯作者: Keller, Luise
刊名: HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES
ISSN: 0885-6087
EISSN: 1099-1085
出版年: 2019
卷: 33, 期:4, 页码:535-550
语种: 英语
英文关键词: climate change ; flood peak ; flood volume ; impact assessment ; scenario-neutral ; uncertainty
WOS关键词: LAND-USE CHANGE ; RUNOFF ; SENSITIVITY ; PROJECTIONS ; CATCHMENTS ; GENERATOR ; IDENTIFY ; RISK
WOS学科分类: Water Resources
WOS研究方向: Water Resources
英文摘要:

Scenario-neutral assessments of climate change impact on floods analyse the sensitivity of a catchment to a range of changes in selected meteorological variables such as temperature and precipitation. The key challenges of the approach are the choice of the meteorological variables and statistics thereof and how to generate time series representing altered climatologies of the selected variables. Different methods have been proposed to achieve this, and it remains unclear if and to which extent they result in comparable flood change projections. Here, we compare projections of annual maximum floods (AMFs) derived from three different scenario-neutral methods for a prealpine study catchment. The methods chosen use different types of meteorological data, namely, observations, regional climate model output, and weather generator data. The different time series account for projected changes in the seasonality of temperature and precipitation, in the occurrence statistics of precipitation, and of daily precipitation extremes. Resulting change in mean AMF peak magnitudes and volumes differs in sign between the methods (range of -6% to +7% for flood peak magnitudes and -11% to +14% for flood volumes). Moreover, variability of projected peak magnitudes and flood volumes depends on method with one approach leading to a generally larger spread. The differences between the methods vary depending on whether peak magnitudes or flood volumes are considered and different relationships between peak magnitude and volume change result. These findings can be linked to differing flood regime changes among the three approaches. The study highlights that considering selected aspects of climate change only when performing scenario-neutral studies may lead to differing representations of flood generating processes by the approaches and thus different quantifications of flood change. As each method comes with its own strengths and weaknesses, it is recommended to combine several scenario-neutral approaches to obtain more robust results.


Citation statistics:
资源类型: 期刊论文
标识符: http://119.78.100.158/handle/2HF3EXSE/129943
Appears in Collections:气候减缓与适应

Files in This Item:

There are no files associated with this item.


作者单位: 1.Univ Bern, Inst Geog, Bern, Switzerland
2.Univ Bern, Oeschger Ctr Climate Change Res, Bern, Switzerland
3.Univ Bern, Mobiliar Lab Nat Risks, Bern, Switzerland

Recommended Citation:
Keller, Luise,Rossler, Ole,Martius, Olivia,et al. Comparison of scenario-neutral approaches for estimation of climate change impacts on flood characteristics[J]. HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES,2019-01-01,33(4):535-550
Service
Recommend this item
Sava as my favorate item
Show this item's statistics
Export Endnote File
Google Scholar
Similar articles in Google Scholar
[Keller, Luise]'s Articles
[Rossler, Ole]'s Articles
[Martius, Olivia]'s Articles
百度学术
Similar articles in Baidu Scholar
[Keller, Luise]'s Articles
[Rossler, Ole]'s Articles
[Martius, Olivia]'s Articles
CSDL cross search
Similar articles in CSDL Cross Search
[Keller, Luise]‘s Articles
[Rossler, Ole]‘s Articles
[Martius, Olivia]‘s Articles
Related Copyright Policies
Null
收藏/分享
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

Items in IR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.