globalchange  > 气候变化事实与影响
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.190
WOS记录号: WOS:000457952500082
论文题名:
Farm-level strategies to reduce the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of cotton production: An Australian perspective
作者: Hedayati, Mehdi1; Brock, Philippa M.2,3; Nachimuthu, Gunasekhar4; Schwenke, Graeme1
通讯作者: Nachimuthu, Gunasekhar
刊名: JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
ISSN: 0959-6526
EISSN: 1879-1786
出版年: 2019
卷: 212, 页码:974-985
语种: 英语
英文关键词: Cotton production ; Life cycle assessment ; Sustainability ; Climate mitigation ; Nitrous oxide
WOS关键词: FURROW-IRRIGATED COTTON ; WATER-USE EFFICIENCY ; CRACKING CLAY SOIL ; CARBON ; SUSTAINABILITY ; SYSTEMS ; DRIP
WOS学科分类: Green & Sustainable Science & Technology ; Engineering, Environmental ; Environmental Sciences
WOS研究方向: Science & Technology - Other Topics ; Engineering ; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
英文摘要:

For many agricultural commodity sectors, efforts to meet international obligations regarding emissions reduction are increasing. The Australian cotton industry has already made advances in this regard and the high yields associated with Australian cotton production dramatically minimise greenhouse gas emissions intensity. However, certainty about the quantum of greenhouse gas emissions and the relative contribution of different components of the emissions profile is somewhat unclear; and opportunities for farm-level practice change have not been fully explored. The objectives of this paper were to, (a) build a robust greenhouse gas emissions profile for the product-chain of Australian cotton fibre (lint) grown in northwest New South Wales, (b) using Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), compare the relative contributions of the different industries involved in the product-chain of cotton fibre (e.g. fertiliser producers, cotton farmers, cotton ginning plants) and (c) assess the effects of an array of on-farm mitigation options. Testing the various management options provides information for growers and policy-makers about the relative emissions reduction benefits possible. Additionally, we compared results of previous Australian cotton production studies using similar assumptions and extrapolated the emissions profile to a national scale, with the intention of informing commodity and carbon markets.


The foreground data for the study were for the three production seasons from 2011-2012 to 2013-2014 in northwest New South Wales, with a functional unit of one tonne of cotton lint at port. We also drew upon published data, survey data, scientific literature and Australian and international databases. To ensure consistency between our approach and that applied to meet international emissions reporting obligations, we applied emissions formulae and factors from the Australian National Inventory Report, except where more specific published data were available. We assumed that 96% of production was from irrigated systems, with 85% of irrigation water pumped by diesel-powered irrigation pumps and a median irrigated yield of 10.3 bales per ha. We tested the sensitivity of the resulting emissions profile to a wide array of enterprise assumptions and calculation variables.


The climate change impact of cotton lint on a cradle-to-port basis was 1601 kg CO(2)e per tonne of cotton lint. The 'hot-spots' within the emissions profile included the production and use of synthetic nitrogen (N) fertilisers (46% of emissions), the production and use of electricity and diesel used for irrigation (10%) and the production and use of diesel for farm machinery (9%).


Farm level management options with potential to minimise life cycle GHG emissions were: reducing N fertiliser rate from a commercial rate of 255 kg N/ha to 240 kg N/ha or 180 kg N/ha (2.6% and 13.2% emissions reduction); use of controlled-release and stabilised N fertilisers (5.9% reduction), changing from diesel to solar-powered irrigation pumps (8.1% reduction), changing from diesel to biofuel-powered farm machinery (3.4% reduction), changing from continuous cotton to a cotton-legume crop rotation (3.9% reduction) and use of N fertigation (2.1% reduction). Whilst we focused on farm-level mitigation strategies, these changes were placed in the context of the cradle-to-gate system, to account for associated changes in pre-farm and post-farm emissions. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.


Citation statistics:
资源类型: 期刊论文
标识符: http://119.78.100.158/handle/2HF3EXSE/131424
Appears in Collections:气候变化事实与影响

Files in This Item:

There are no files associated with this item.


作者单位: 1.Tamworth Agr Inst, NSW Dept Primary Ind, 4 Marsden Pk Rd, Calala, NSW 2340, Australia
2.NSW Dept Primary Ind, Locked Bag 5123, Parramatta, NSW 2124, Australia
3.Univ Sydney, Fac Sci, Sydney Inst Agr, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
4.Australian Cotton Res Inst, NSW Dept Primary Ind, 21888 Kamilaroi Highway, Narrabri, NSW 2390, Australia

Recommended Citation:
Hedayati, Mehdi,Brock, Philippa M.,Nachimuthu, Gunasekhar,et al. Farm-level strategies to reduce the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of cotton production: An Australian perspective[J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION,2019-01-01,212:974-985
Service
Recommend this item
Sava as my favorate item
Show this item's statistics
Export Endnote File
Google Scholar
Similar articles in Google Scholar
[Hedayati, Mehdi]'s Articles
[Brock, Philippa M.]'s Articles
[Nachimuthu, Gunasekhar]'s Articles
百度学术
Similar articles in Baidu Scholar
[Hedayati, Mehdi]'s Articles
[Brock, Philippa M.]'s Articles
[Nachimuthu, Gunasekhar]'s Articles
CSDL cross search
Similar articles in CSDL Cross Search
[Hedayati, Mehdi]‘s Articles
[Brock, Philippa M.]‘s Articles
[Nachimuthu, Gunasekhar]‘s Articles
Related Copyright Policies
Null
收藏/分享
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

Items in IR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.