globalchange  > 气候变化事实与影响
DOI: 10.3390/w11040780
WOS记录号: WOS:000473105700150
论文题名:
Comparison of Surface Water Volume Estimation Methodologies That Couple Surface Reflectance Data and Digital Terrain Models
作者: Fuentes, Ignacio; Padarian, Jose; van Ogtrop, Floris; Vervoort, R. Willem
通讯作者: Fuentes, Ignacio
刊名: WATER
ISSN: 2073-4441
出版年: 2019
卷: 11, 期:4
语种: 英语
英文关键词: flood mapping ; water volumes ; remote sensing ; Google Earth Engine
WOS关键词: RESERVOIR STORAGE CAPACITIES ; SATELLITE ; RESOLUTION ; IMAGERY ; LAKES
WOS学科分类: Water Resources
WOS研究方向: Water Resources
英文摘要:

Uncertainty about global change requires alternatives to quantify the availability of water resources and their dynamics. A methodology based on different satellite imagery and surface elevation models to estimate surface water volumes would be useful to monitor flood events and reservoir storages. In this study, reservoirs with associated digital terrain models (DTM) and continuously monitored volumes were selected. The inundated extent was based on a supervised classification using surface reflectance in Landsat 5 images. To estimate associated water volumes, the DTMs were sampled at the perimeter of inundated areas and an inverse distance weighting interpolation was used to populate the water elevation inside the flooded polygons. The developed methodology (IDW) was compared against different published methodologies to estimate water volumes from digital elevation models, which assume either a flat water surface using the maximum elevation of inundated areas (Max), and a flat water surface using the median elevation of the perimeter of inundated areas (Median), or a tilted surface, where water elevations are based on an iterative focal maximum statistic with increasing window sizes (FwDET), and finally a tilted water surface obtained by replacing the focal maximum statistic from the FwDET methodology with a focal mean statistic (FwDET_mean). Volume estimates depend strongly on both water detection and the terrain model. The Max and the FwDET methodologies are highly affected by the water detection step, and the FwDET_mean methodology leads to lower volume estimates due to the iterative smoothing of elevations, which also tends to be computationally expensive for big areas. The Median and IDW methodologies outperform the rest of the methods, and IDW can be used for both reservoir and flood volume monitoring. Different sources of error can be observed, being systematic errors associated with the DTM acquisition time and the reported volumes, which for example fail to consider dynamic sedimentation processes taking place in reservoirs. Resolution effects account for a fraction of errors, being mainly caused by terrain curvature.


Citation statistics:
资源类型: 期刊论文
标识符: http://119.78.100.158/handle/2HF3EXSE/133028
Appears in Collections:气候变化事实与影响

Files in This Item:

There are no files associated with this item.


作者单位: Univ Sydney, Sch Life & Environm Sci, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia

Recommended Citation:
Fuentes, Ignacio,Padarian, Jose,van Ogtrop, Floris,et al. Comparison of Surface Water Volume Estimation Methodologies That Couple Surface Reflectance Data and Digital Terrain Models[J]. WATER,2019-01-01,11(4)
Service
Recommend this item
Sava as my favorate item
Show this item's statistics
Export Endnote File
Google Scholar
Similar articles in Google Scholar
[Fuentes, Ignacio]'s Articles
[Padarian, Jose]'s Articles
[van Ogtrop, Floris]'s Articles
百度学术
Similar articles in Baidu Scholar
[Fuentes, Ignacio]'s Articles
[Padarian, Jose]'s Articles
[van Ogtrop, Floris]'s Articles
CSDL cross search
Similar articles in CSDL Cross Search
[Fuentes, Ignacio]‘s Articles
[Padarian, Jose]‘s Articles
[van Ogtrop, Floris]‘s Articles
Related Copyright Policies
Null
收藏/分享
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

Items in IR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.