globalchange  > 影响、适应和脆弱性
DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/11/11/113003
论文题名:
Evidence based review: positive versus negative effects of livestock grazing on wildlife. What do we really know?
作者: Jennifer M Schieltz; Daniel I Rubenstein
刊名: Environmental Research Letters
ISSN: 1748-9326
出版年: 2016
发表日期: 2016-11-11
卷: 11, 期:11
语种: 英语
英文摘要:

More than a quarter of earth's land surface is used for grazing domestic livestock. Livestock grazing is generally assumed to negatively affect wildlife, however, a number of studies have found positive impacts as well. We conducted an evidence-based review of the existing literature using a series of livestock- and wildlife-related search words to systematically query Google Scholar and Web of Science. A total of 807 sources were included in the final list, including 646 primary sources which reported original data. The majority of studies were conducted in North America (338) or Europe (123), with many fewer from Africa (57), Australia (54), Central/South America (43), or Asia (31). Most studies examined birds (330) and mammals (262), with fewer including reptiles (91) or amphibians (58). We extracted further information from studies that included mammals on positive, negative, and neutral effects of livestock grazing on mammals. We found that livestock change vegetation structure and cover in ways important to small mammals, while ungulates may be affected more by interference competition and changes in forage quantity and quality. Community-level total abundance of small mammals typically declines with grazing. Species richness of small mammals either declines or stays the same, as many studies found a change in species composition from ungrazed to grazed sites while the number of species remained similar. Individual species responses of small mammals vary. Voles, harvest mice, cotton rats, and shrews show consistently negative responses to grazing while deer mice, kangaroo rats, ground squirrels, and lagomorphs show positive or variable responses. In general, species adapted to open habitats are often positively affected by grazing, while species needing denser cover are negatively affected. Studies of wild ungulates are more variable in methodology and quality than those for small mammals. We found more negative (n = 86) than positive (n = 34) ungulate responses overall, however, most studies have been on browsers and mixed feeders, namely deer and elk, and there is little available data for other groups. Although data is limited, several of the grazing species in Africa may show a trend toward positive responses, suggesting possible facilitation. For a number of species, responses varied by season. We find a strong need for additional research on ungulates of varying diets and body sizes, especially in the developing world, and across longer time scales to examine possible tradeoffs between competition and facilitation from livestock.

URL: http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/11/11/113003
Citation statistics:
资源类型: 期刊论文
标识符: http://119.78.100.158/handle/2HF3EXSE/13966
Appears in Collections:影响、适应和脆弱性
气候减缓与适应

Files in This Item: Download All
File Name/ File Size Content Type Version Access License
Schieltz_2016_Environ._Res._Lett._11_113003.pdf(1901KB)期刊论文作者接受稿开放获取View Download

Recommended Citation:
Jennifer M Schieltz,Daniel I Rubenstein. Evidence based review: positive versus negative effects of livestock grazing on wildlife. What do we really know?[J]. Environmental Research Letters,2016-01-01,11(11)
Service
Recommend this item
Sava as my favorate item
Show this item's statistics
Export Endnote File
Google Scholar
Similar articles in Google Scholar
[Jennifer M Schieltz]'s Articles
[Daniel I Rubenstein]'s Articles
百度学术
Similar articles in Baidu Scholar
[Jennifer M Schieltz]'s Articles
[Daniel I Rubenstein]'s Articles
CSDL cross search
Similar articles in CSDL Cross Search
[Jennifer M Schieltz]‘s Articles
[Daniel I Rubenstein]‘s Articles
Related Copyright Policies
Null
收藏/分享
文件名: Schieltz_2016_Environ._Res._Lett._11_113003.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF
此文件暂不支持浏览
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

Items in IR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.