globalchange  > 过去全球变化的重建
DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2017.07.002
WOS记录号: WOS:000466849300007
论文题名:
Balancing different forest values: Evaluation of forest management scenarios in a multi-criteria decision analysis framework
作者: Eggers, Jeannette1; Holmgren, Sara2; Nordstrom, Eva-Maria1; Lamas, Tomas1; Lind, Torgny1; Ohman, Karin1
通讯作者: Eggers, Jeannette
刊名: FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS
ISSN: 1389-9341
EISSN: 1872-7050
出版年: 2019
卷: 103, 页码:55-69
语种: 英语
英文关键词: Multi-criteria decision analysis ; Value functions ; Expert participation ; Forest management scenarios ; Sustainable forest management
WOS关键词: CLIMATE-CHANGE ADAPTATION ; MULTIPLE CRITERIA ; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES ; SUPPORT ; BIODIVERSITY ; STRATEGIES ; ENHANCE ; POLICY
WOS学科分类: Economics ; Environmental Studies ; Forestry
WOS研究方向: Business & Economics ; Environmental Sciences & Ecology ; Forestry
英文摘要:

Besides traditional timber production, other forest functions, such as biodiversity and recreation, have gained increasing importance during the last few decades. Demands on forests have become more diversified, thus making forest management and planning more complex. To meet these challenges, there is a growing interest in a more diversified silviculture, for which a number of different management options are available. However, it remains unclear how the various management options affect economic, ecological, and social aspects of sustainable forest management. Hence, in this study, we assess the consequences of various management options on different aspects of sustainable forest management through scenario analysis using a forestry decision support system. We evaluate 10 different forest management scenarios for two contrasting municipalities in Sweden, based on expert participation by way of a web-based multi-criteria decision analysis framework. We asked experts in economic, ecological, and social forest values, as well as those in reindeer husbandry, to weigh a number of indicators in their field of expertise against each other, and to create value functions for each indicator. We then determined scenario ranking for different sets of weights for economic, ecological and social forest values. Our results indicate that current management practices are favorable for economic aspects (wood production), while a number of scenarios would be better suited to fulfill the Swedish co-equal forest policy goal of production and consideration of environmental issues, such as scenarios with longer rotation periods, a larger share of set-asides and a higher share of continuous cover forestry. These measures would be beneficial not only for ecological values, but also for social values and for reindeer husbandry. Furthermore, we found that expert participation through the web-tool was a promising alternative to physical meetings that require more commitment in terms of time and resources.


Citation statistics:
资源类型: 期刊论文
标识符: http://119.78.100.158/handle/2HF3EXSE/140002
Appears in Collections:过去全球变化的重建

Files in This Item:

There are no files associated with this item.


作者单位: 1.Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Dept Forest Resource Management, SE-90183 Umea, Sweden
2.Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Unit Forest Policy, POB 7008, SE-75651 Uppsala, Sweden

Recommended Citation:
Eggers, Jeannette,Holmgren, Sara,Nordstrom, Eva-Maria,et al. Balancing different forest values: Evaluation of forest management scenarios in a multi-criteria decision analysis framework[J]. FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS,2019-01-01,103:55-69
Service
Recommend this item
Sava as my favorate item
Show this item's statistics
Export Endnote File
Google Scholar
Similar articles in Google Scholar
[Eggers, Jeannette]'s Articles
[Holmgren, Sara]'s Articles
[Nordstrom, Eva-Maria]'s Articles
百度学术
Similar articles in Baidu Scholar
[Eggers, Jeannette]'s Articles
[Holmgren, Sara]'s Articles
[Nordstrom, Eva-Maria]'s Articles
CSDL cross search
Similar articles in CSDL Cross Search
[Eggers, Jeannette]‘s Articles
[Holmgren, Sara]‘s Articles
[Nordstrom, Eva-Maria]‘s Articles
Related Copyright Policies
Null
收藏/分享
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

Items in IR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.