globalchange  > 过去全球变化的重建
DOI: 10.1080/07011784.2019.1623077
WOS记录号: WOS:000472943500001
论文题名:
Comparing single and multi-objective hydrologic model calibration considering reservoir inflow and streamflow observations
作者: Bomhof, James1; Tolson, Bryan A.2; Kouwen, Nicholas2
通讯作者: Bomhof, James
刊名: CANADIAN WATER RESOURCES JOURNAL
ISSN: 0701-1784
EISSN: 1918-1817
出版年: 2019
语种: 英语
英文关键词: Hydrologic ; calibration ; multi-objective ; Dynamically Dimensioned Search ; Lake of the Woods ; LWCB ; WATFLOOD
WOS关键词: AUTOMATIC CALIBRATION ; CLIMATE-CHANGE ; OPTIMIZATION ; UNCERTAINTIES ; ALGORITHMS ; BASIN
WOS学科分类: Water Resources
WOS研究方向: Water Resources
英文摘要:

Calibration techniques were investigated on how to best optimize a 149 parameter, distributed hydrological model of the Lake of the Woods - Rainy Lake (LOWRL) watershed. Single objective calibrations based only on streamflow, only on reservoir inflows or average performance of both observation types, optimized using the Dynamically Dimensioned Search (DDS) algorithm, were compared with a multi-objective optimization approach with both observation types using the Pareto Archived DDS (PADDS) algorithm. Results from synthetic calibration tests against a known solution showed that PADDS was able to repeatedly find solutions with streamflow and reservoir inflow Nash-Sutcliffe coefficients of more than 0.95 and 0.99 using 2000 and 8000 model evaluations, respectively, demonstrating the effectiveness of PADDS on a limited calibration budget. When the LOWRL model was calibrated to actual observations with PADDS using 2000 evaluations, the algorithm repeatedly returned solutions with validation period streamflow and reservoir inflow Nash-Sutcliffe coefficients of approximately 0.71 and 0.87, respectively. Results demonstrate the capabilities of PADDS to reasonably calibrate a large dimensional hydrologic model on a restricted budget of 2000 model evaluations and highlight the importance of calibrating to both reservoir inflows and streamflows simultaneously. Considering the comparative results under multiple calibration trials, the multi-objective formulation solved by PADDS is shown to generate equivalent quality results as a weighted single objective approach solved by DDS (averaging reservoir inflow and streamflow calibration objectives).


Citation statistics:
资源类型: 期刊论文
标识符: http://119.78.100.158/handle/2HF3EXSE/140318
Appears in Collections:过去全球变化的重建

Files in This Item:

There are no files associated with this item.


作者单位: 1.Lake Woods Control Board Secretariat, Ottawa, ON, Canada
2.Univ Waterloo, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Waterloo, ON, Canada

Recommended Citation:
Bomhof, James,Tolson, Bryan A.,Kouwen, Nicholas. Comparing single and multi-objective hydrologic model calibration considering reservoir inflow and streamflow observations[J]. CANADIAN WATER RESOURCES JOURNAL,2019-01-01
Service
Recommend this item
Sava as my favorate item
Show this item's statistics
Export Endnote File
Google Scholar
Similar articles in Google Scholar
[Bomhof, James]'s Articles
[Tolson, Bryan A.]'s Articles
[Kouwen, Nicholas]'s Articles
百度学术
Similar articles in Baidu Scholar
[Bomhof, James]'s Articles
[Tolson, Bryan A.]'s Articles
[Kouwen, Nicholas]'s Articles
CSDL cross search
Similar articles in CSDL Cross Search
[Bomhof, James]‘s Articles
[Tolson, Bryan A.]‘s Articles
[Kouwen, Nicholas]‘s Articles
Related Copyright Policies
Null
收藏/分享
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

Items in IR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.