globalchange  > 过去全球变化的重建
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.449
WOS记录号: WOS:000466979400066
论文题名:
Critical review on life cycle assessment of conventional and innovative waste-to-energy technologies
作者: Mayer, Felix1; Bhandari, Ramchandra1; Gaeth, Stefan2
通讯作者: Mayer, Felix
刊名: SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
ISSN: 0048-9697
EISSN: 1879-1026
出版年: 2019
卷: 672, 页码:708-721
语种: 英语
英文关键词: Ecological life cycle assessment ; Waste-to-energy ; Energy recovery ; Advanced waste treatment ; Cascaded waste treatment
WOS关键词: MUNICIPAL SOLID-WASTE ; SEWAGE-SLUDGE TREATMENT ; FOOD WASTE ; MANAGEMENT-SYSTEMS ; HYDROTHERMAL CARBONIZATION ; ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ; IMPACT ASSESSMENT ; GASIFICATION ; SCENARIOS ; RECOVERY
WOS学科分类: Environmental Sciences
WOS研究方向: Environmental Sciences & Ecology
英文摘要:

In this study 315 peer-reviewed studies on environmental life cycle assessment (LCA) of waste-to-energy (WtE) technologies were critically analysed. The technologies considered were anaerobic digestion, hydrothermal carbonization, pyrolysis, gasification and incineration. It was found that overall increasingly more studies are concerned with LCA on waste-treatment systems. Although incineration and anaerobic digestion were primarily assessed, especially in recent years, a growing number of LCA-studies investigated advanced thermal treatment options. The geographical scope within the studies under review focused mainly on European (195 studies) and Asian (68 studies) regions.


In regards to their quality, a majority of the analysed studies were marked by several shortcomings and showed poor compliance with the ISO 14040 and ISO 14044. 55 studies did not present a functional unit and >45% of all reviewed studies did not present a life cycle inventory. More than 50% of the reviewed studies omitted a sensitivity analysis and a comprehensive assessment of all impact categories was not present in most studies.


By selecting studies that analysed two or more different WtE treatment options, the global warming potential and the acidification potential of the considered five different technologies were compared. By contrasting advanced treatment options against incineration, substantial environmental benefits of advanced treatment options could not be observed. However, only 34 studies fulfilled the criteria to be taken into account for this comparison. The main finding within this scope, was that anaerobic digestion and gasification seemed to outcompete incineration in the conversion process of waste. Cascaded waste treatment, i.e. combining several treatment technologies, was only present in few studies. Environmental benefits could be assigned to these treatment paths in most cases. Lastly, techno-economic aspects are highlighted and appropriate policies are deducted from the obtained results. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.


Citation statistics:
资源类型: 期刊论文
标识符: http://119.78.100.158/handle/2HF3EXSE/141165
Appears in Collections:过去全球变化的重建

Files in This Item:

There are no files associated with this item.


作者单位: 1.TH Koln Univ Appl Sci, Inst Technol & Resources Management Trop & Subtro, Betzdorfer Str 2, D-50679 Cologne, Germany
2.Justus Liebig Univ, Dept Agr Sci Nutr Sci & Environm Management, Heinrich Buff Ring 26-32, D-35392 Giessen, Germany

Recommended Citation:
Mayer, Felix,Bhandari, Ramchandra,Gaeth, Stefan. Critical review on life cycle assessment of conventional and innovative waste-to-energy technologies[J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT,2019-01-01,672:708-721
Service
Recommend this item
Sava as my favorate item
Show this item's statistics
Export Endnote File
Google Scholar
Similar articles in Google Scholar
[Mayer, Felix]'s Articles
[Bhandari, Ramchandra]'s Articles
[Gaeth, Stefan]'s Articles
百度学术
Similar articles in Baidu Scholar
[Mayer, Felix]'s Articles
[Bhandari, Ramchandra]'s Articles
[Gaeth, Stefan]'s Articles
CSDL cross search
Similar articles in CSDL Cross Search
[Mayer, Felix]‘s Articles
[Bhandari, Ramchandra]‘s Articles
[Gaeth, Stefan]‘s Articles
Related Copyright Policies
Null
收藏/分享
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

Items in IR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.