globalchange  > 过去全球变化的重建
DOI: 10.1111/jvs.12763
WOS记录号: WOS:000474629200004
论文题名:
Assessing sampling coverage of species distribution in biodiversity databases
作者: Sporbert, Maria1,2; Bruelheide, Helge1,2; Seidler, Gunnar1; Keil, Petr1,3; Jandt, Ute1,2; Austrheim, Gunnar4; Biurrun, Idoia5; Antonio Campos, Juan5; Carni, Andraz6,7; Chytry, Milan8; Csiky, Janos9; De Bie, Els10; Dengler, Juergen11,12; Golub, Valentin13; Grytnes, John-Arvid14; Indreica, Adrian15; Jansen, Florian16; Jirousek, Martin8,17; Lenoir, Jonathan18; Luoto, Miska19; Marceno, Corrado5; Moeslund, Jesper Erenskjold20; Perez-Haase, Aaron21; Rusina, Solvita22; Vandvik, Vigdis14,23; Vassilev, Kiril24; Welk, Erik1,2
通讯作者: Sporbert, Maria
刊名: JOURNAL OF VEGETATION SCIENCE
ISSN: 1100-9233
EISSN: 1654-1103
出版年: 2019
卷: 30, 期:4, 页码:620-632
语种: 英语
英文关键词: Chorological Database Halle (CDH) ; climatic niche ; Dynamic Match Coefficient (DMC) ; European Vegetation Archive (EVA) ; macro-ecology ; multi-scale ; realized niche ; sampling bias ; spatial scale ; species range ; vascular plant ; vegetation plot databases
WOS关键词: CLIMATE-CHANGE ; NICHE ; RICHNESS ; DIVERSITY ; COMPLETENESS ; PERFORMANCE ; ESTIMATORS ; BIASES ; AREAS ; GAPS
WOS学科分类: Plant Sciences ; Ecology ; Forestry
WOS研究方向: Plant Sciences ; Environmental Sciences & Ecology ; Forestry
英文摘要:

Aim Biodiversity databases are valuable resources for understanding plant species distributions and dynamics, but they may insufficiently represent the actual geographic distribution and climatic niches of species. Here we propose and test a method to assess sampling coverage of species distribution in biodiversity databases in geographic and climatic space. Location Europe. Methods Using a test selection of 808,794 vegetation plots from the European Vegetation Archive (EVA), we assessed the sampling coverage of 564 European vascular plant species across both their geographic ranges and realized climatic niches. Range maps from the Chorological Database Halle (CDH) were used as background reference data to capture species geographic ranges and to derive species climatic niches. To quantify sampling coverage, we developed a box-counting method, the Dynamic Match Coefficient (DMC), which quantifies how much a set of occurrences of a given species matches with its geographic range or climatic niche. DMC is the area under the curve measuring the match between occurrence data and background reference (geographic range or climatic niche) across grids with variable resolution. High DMC values indicate good sampling coverage. We applied null models to compare observed DMC values with expectations from random distributions across species ranges and niches. Results Comparisons with null models showed that, for most species, actual distributions within EVA are deviating from null model expectations and are more clumped than expected in both geographic and climatic space. Despite high interspecific variation, we found a positive relationship in DMC values between geographic and climatic space, but sampling coverage was in general more random across geographic space. Conclusion Because DMC values are species-specific and most biodiversity databases are clearly biased in terms of sampling coverage of species occurrences, we recommend using DMC values as covariates in macro-ecological models that use species as the observation unit.


Citation statistics:
资源类型: 期刊论文
标识符: http://119.78.100.158/handle/2HF3EXSE/141486
Appears in Collections:过去全球变化的重建

Files in This Item:

There are no files associated with this item.


作者单位: 1.Martin Luther Univ Halle Wittenberg, Geobot & Bot Garden, Inst Biol, Halle, Germany
2.German Ctr Integrat Biodivers Res iDiv, Leipzig, Germany
3.Martin Luther Univ Halle Wittenberg, Inst Comp Sci Biodivers Synth, Halle, Germany
4.Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Univ Museum, Dept Nat Hist, Trondheim, Norway
5.Univ Basque Country, UPV EHU, Dept Plant Biol & Ecol, Bilbao, Spain
6.Slovenian Acad Sci & Arts, Jovan Hadzi Inst Biol, Sci Res Ctr, Ljubljana, Slovenia
7.Univ Nova Gorica, Sch Viticulture & Enol, Nova Gorica, Slovenia
8.Masaryk Univ, Fac Sci, Dept Bot & Zool, Brno, Czech Republic
9.Univ Pecs, Inst Biol Ecol, Pecs, Hungary
10.Biotope Divers, Res Inst Nat & Forest, Brussels, Belgium
11.Zurich Univ Appl Sci ZHAW, Inst Nat Resource Management IUNR, Vegetat Ecol Grp, Wadenswil, Switzerland
12.Univ Bayreuth, Bayreuth Ctr Ecol & Environm Res BayCEER, Plant Ecol, Bayreuth, Germany
13.Russian Acad Sci, Inst Ecol Volga River Basin, Tolyatti, Russia
14.Univ Bergen, Dept Biol Sci, Bergen, Norway
15.Transilvania Univ Brasov, Dept Silviculture, Brasov, Romania
16.Univ Rostock, Fac Agr & Environm Sci, Rostock, Germany
17.Mendel Univ Brno, Fac AgriSci, Dept Plant Biol, Brno, Czech Republic
18.UPJV, CNRS, UMR 7058, UR Ecol & Dynam Syst Anthropises EDYSAN, Amiens, France
19.Univ Helsinki, Dept Geosci & Geog, Helsinki, Finland
20.Aarhus Univ, Dept Biosci Biodivers & Conservat, Ronde, Denmark
21.Univ Barcelona, Dept Evolutionary Biol Ecol & Environm Sci, Barcelona, Spain
22.Univ Latvia, Fac Geog & Earth Sci, Riga, Latvia
23.Univ Bergen, Bjerknes Ctr Climate Res, Bergen, Norway
24.Bulgarian Acad Sci, Inst Biodivers & Ecosyst Res Plant & Fungal Diver, Sofia, Bulgaria

Recommended Citation:
Sporbert, Maria,Bruelheide, Helge,Seidler, Gunnar,et al. Assessing sampling coverage of species distribution in biodiversity databases[J]. JOURNAL OF VEGETATION SCIENCE,2019-01-01,30(4):620-632
Service
Recommend this item
Sava as my favorate item
Show this item's statistics
Export Endnote File
Google Scholar
Similar articles in Google Scholar
[Sporbert, Maria]'s Articles
[Bruelheide, Helge]'s Articles
[Seidler, Gunnar]'s Articles
百度学术
Similar articles in Baidu Scholar
[Sporbert, Maria]'s Articles
[Bruelheide, Helge]'s Articles
[Seidler, Gunnar]'s Articles
CSDL cross search
Similar articles in CSDL Cross Search
[Sporbert, Maria]‘s Articles
[Bruelheide, Helge]‘s Articles
[Seidler, Gunnar]‘s Articles
Related Copyright Policies
Null
收藏/分享
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

Items in IR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.