Iconic places, including World Heritage areas, are symbolic and synonymous with national and cultural identities. Recognition of an existential threat to an icon may therefore arouse public concern and protective sentiment. Here we test this assumption by comparing sentiments, threat perceptions and values associated with the Great Barrier Reef and climate change attitudes among 4,681 Australian and international tourists visiting the Great Barrier Reef region before and after mass coral bleaching in 2016 and 2017. There was an increase in grief-related responses and decline in self-efficacy, which could inhibit individual action. However, there was also an increase in protective sentiments, ratings of place values and the proportion of respondents who viewed climate change as an immediate threat. These results suggest that imperilled icons have potential to mobilize public support around addressing the wider threat of climate change but that achieving and sustaining engagement will require a strategic approach to overcome self-efficacy barriers.
1.James Cook Univ, CSIRO Land & Water, Townsville, Qld, Australia 2.PSL Univ Paris, Natl Ctr Sci Res, CRIOBE CNRS EPHE UPVD USR3278, Paris, France 3.Lab Excellence CORAIL, Papetoai Moorea, French Polynesi, France 4.US Natl Ocean & Atmospher Adm, Coral Reef Watch, College Pk, MD USA 5.James Cook Univ, Coll Sci & Engn, Marine Geophys Lab, Phys, Townsville, Qld, Australia 6.Great Barrier Reef Marine Pk Author, Townsville, Qld, Australia 7.CSIRO Land & Water, Brisbane, Qld, Australia 8.James Cook Univ, Coll Business Law & Governance, Townsville, Qld, Australia
Recommended Citation:
Curnock, Matthew, I,Marshall, Nadine A.,Thiault, Lauric,et al. Shifts in tourists' sentiments and climate risk perceptions following mass coral bleaching of the Great Barrier Reef[J]. NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE,2019-01-01,9(7):535-+