globalchange  > 全球变化的国际研究计划
DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.04.008
WOS记录号: WOS:000471206700019
论文题名:
Comparison of life cycle environmental impacts from meal kits and grocery store meals
作者: Heard, Brent R.1; Bandekar, Mayur2; Vassa, Benjamin3; Miller, Shelie A.1,2
通讯作者: Heard, Brent R.
刊名: RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING
ISSN: 0921-3449
EISSN: 1879-0658
出版年: 2019
卷: 147, 页码:189-200
语种: 英语
英文关键词: E-commerce ; Food waste ; Packaging ; Supply chain management ; Food retailing ; Last-mile transportation
WOS关键词: FOOD WASTE ; CLIMATE-CHANGE ; SUSTAINABILITY ; RETAIL ; SUPERMARKETS ; CONSUMPTION ; FRAMEWORK ; BENEFITS ; DELIVERY ; ONLINE
WOS学科分类: Engineering, Environmental ; Environmental Sciences
WOS研究方向: Engineering ; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
英文摘要:

Meal kits contain ingredients for cooking a meal that are pre-portioned, packaged, and delivered to a consumer's residence. Life cycle environmental impacts associated with climate change, acidification, eutrophication, land use, and water use are compared for five dinner recipes sourced as meal kits and through grocery store retailing. Inventory data are obtained from direct measurement of ingredients and packaging, supplemented with literature data for supply chain and production parameters. Results indicate that, on average, grocery meal greenhouse gas emissions are 33% higher than meal kits (8.1 kg CO(2)e/meal compared with 6.1 kg CO(2)e/meal kit). Other impact categories follow similar trends. A Monte Carlo analysis finds higher median emissions for grocery meals than meal kits for four out of five meals, occurring in 100% of model runs for two of five meals. Results suggest that meal kits' streamlined and direct-to-consumer supply chains (-1.05 kg CO(2)e/meal), reduced food waste (-0.86 kg CO(2)e/meal), and lower last-mile transportation emissions ( 0.45 kg CO(2)e/meal), appear to be sufficient to offset observed increases in packaging (0.17 kg CO(2)e/meal). Additionally, meal kit refrigeration packs present an average emissions decrease compared with retail refrigeration (-0.37 kg CO(2)e/meal). Meals with the largest environmental impact either contain red meat or are associated with large amounts of wasted food. The one meal kit with higher emissions is due to food mass differences rather than supply chain logistics. Meal kits are an evolving mode for food supply, and the environmental effects of potential changes to meal kit provision and grocery retailing are discussed.


Citation statistics:
资源类型: 期刊论文
标识符: http://119.78.100.158/handle/2HF3EXSE/144892
Appears in Collections:全球变化的国际研究计划

Files in This Item:

There are no files associated with this item.


作者单位: 1.Univ Michigan, Sch Environm & Sustainabil, Ctr Sustainable Syst, 440 Church St, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
2.Univ Michigan, Program Environm, 440 Church St, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
3.Univ Michigan, A Alfred Taubman Coll Architecture & Urban Planni, 2000 Bonisteel Blvd, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA

Recommended Citation:
Heard, Brent R.,Bandekar, Mayur,Vassa, Benjamin,et al. Comparison of life cycle environmental impacts from meal kits and grocery store meals[J]. RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING,2019-01-01,147:189-200
Service
Recommend this item
Sava as my favorate item
Show this item's statistics
Export Endnote File
Google Scholar
Similar articles in Google Scholar
[Heard, Brent R.]'s Articles
[Bandekar, Mayur]'s Articles
[Vassa, Benjamin]'s Articles
百度学术
Similar articles in Baidu Scholar
[Heard, Brent R.]'s Articles
[Bandekar, Mayur]'s Articles
[Vassa, Benjamin]'s Articles
CSDL cross search
Similar articles in CSDL Cross Search
[Heard, Brent R.]‘s Articles
[Bandekar, Mayur]‘s Articles
[Vassa, Benjamin]‘s Articles
Related Copyright Policies
Null
收藏/分享
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

Items in IR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.