We juxtapose 386 prominent contrarians with 386 expert scientists by tracking their digital footprints across similar to 200,000 research publications and similar to 100,000 English-language digital and print media articles on climate change. Projecting these individuals across the same backdrop facilitates quantifying disparities in media visibility and scientific authority, and identifying organization patterns within their association networks. Here we show via direct comparison that contrarians are featured in 49% more media articles than scientists. Yet when comparing visibility in mainstream media sources only, we observe just a 1% excess visibility, which objectively demonstrates the crowding out of professional mainstream sources by the proliferation of new media sources, many of which contribute to the production and consumption of climate change disinformation at scale. These results demonstrate why climate scientists should increasingly exert their authority in scientific and public discourse, and why professional journalists and editors should adjust the disproportionate attention given to contrarians.
1.Univ Calif Merced, Sch Engn, Ernest & Julio Gallo Management Program, Management Complex Syst Dept, Merced, CA 95343 USA 2.Medialab Sci Po, F-75007 Paris, France 3.Univ Calif Merced, Ctr Climate Commun, Merced, CA 95343 USA 4.Univ Calif Merced, Sierra Nevada Res Inst, Merced, CA 95343 USA
Recommended Citation:
Petersen, Alexander Michael,Vincent, Emmanuel M.,Westerling, Anthony LeRoy. Discrepancy in scientific authority and media visibility of climate change scientists and contrarians[J]. NATURE COMMUNICATIONS,2019-01-01,10