globalchange  > 全球变化的国际研究计划
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.04.099
WOS记录号: WOS:000472692200004
论文题名:
A comparative life-cycle assessment of hydro-, nuclear and wind power: A China study
作者: Wang, Like1; Wang, Yuan1; Du, Huibin2; Zuo, Jian3; Li, Rita Yi Man4; Zhou, Zhihua1; Bi, Fenfen1; Garvlehn, McSimon P.1
通讯作者: Du, Huibin
刊名: APPLIED ENERGY
ISSN: 0306-2619
EISSN: 1872-9118
出版年: 2019
卷: 249, 页码:37-45
语种: 英语
英文关键词: Environmental impact ; Life cycle assessment ; Nuclear ; Wind ; Hydro ; China study
WOS关键词: GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS ; ELECTRICITY-GENERATION ; CARBON EMISSIONS ; ENERGY ; TURBINES ; IMPACTS ; LCA
WOS学科分类: Energy & Fuels ; Engineering, Chemical
WOS研究方向: Energy & Fuels ; Engineering
英文摘要:

Energy sector is one of biggest contributors to the Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions. As a result, it has attracted considerable attention to reduce the GHG emissions of electricity production. Hydro-electric, nuclear and wind power are the top three dean energy in China. In this study, the environmental impacts of these three technologies are analyzed, assessed and compared via a life-cycle assessment approach. The entire life cycle, including the manufacturing, construction, operation and decommissioning stages is examined. Apart from global warming potential (GWP100) caused by GHG emissions, the environmental impacts assessed in this study also included acidification potential (AP), eutrophication potential (EP), photochemical ozone creation potential (POCP) and human toxicity potential (HTP). The results show that wind power technology has the most significant environmental impacts amongst these three clean energies, followed by nuclear power and hydropower. For example, in terms of global warming potential, wind power produces 28.6 +/- 3.2 g CO2-eq/kWh of GWP100 throughout its life cycle, which is higher than that of nuclear power (12.4 +/- 1.5 g CO2-eq/kWh) and hydropower (3.5 +/- 0.4 g CO2-eq/kWh). In addition, this study revealed that the the manufacturing stage is the largest contributor of environmental impacts for wind and hydropower. By contrast, the decommissioning stage is most significant for nuclear power in terms of environmental impacts. The comparative life cycle assessment method proposed in this study provides useful tool for the future environmental assessment of electricity production technologies. Findings of this study provide useful inputs for the sustainable transformation of the energy sector.


Citation statistics:
资源类型: 期刊论文
标识符: http://119.78.100.158/handle/2HF3EXSE/146015
Appears in Collections:全球变化的国际研究计划

Files in This Item:

There are no files associated with this item.


作者单位: 1.Tianjin Univ, Sch Environm Sci & Engn, Tianjin, Peoples R China
2.Tianjin Univ, Coll Management & Econ, Tianjin, Peoples R China
3.Univ Adelaide, Sch Architecture & Built Environm, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
4.Hong Kong Shue Yan Univ, Sustainable Real Estate Res Ctr, Dept Econ & Finance, Hong Kong, Peoples R China

Recommended Citation:
Wang, Like,Wang, Yuan,Du, Huibin,et al. A comparative life-cycle assessment of hydro-, nuclear and wind power: A China study[J]. APPLIED ENERGY,2019-01-01,249:37-45
Service
Recommend this item
Sava as my favorate item
Show this item's statistics
Export Endnote File
Google Scholar
Similar articles in Google Scholar
[Wang, Like]'s Articles
[Wang, Yuan]'s Articles
[Du, Huibin]'s Articles
百度学术
Similar articles in Baidu Scholar
[Wang, Like]'s Articles
[Wang, Yuan]'s Articles
[Du, Huibin]'s Articles
CSDL cross search
Similar articles in CSDL Cross Search
[Wang, Like]‘s Articles
[Wang, Yuan]‘s Articles
[Du, Huibin]‘s Articles
Related Copyright Policies
Null
收藏/分享
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

Items in IR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.