globalchange  > 气候变化与战略
CSCD记录号: CSCD:5238631
论文题名:
昆明市污水处理厂运行综合评价
其他题名: Comprehensive evaluation of performance of wastewater treatment plants in Kunming
作者: 李波1; 吴光学1; 胡洪营1; 吴毅晖2; 郭昉2; 郭玉梅2
刊名: 环境工程学报
ISSN: 1673-9108
出版年: 2014
卷: 8, 期:10, 页码:1035-1042
语种: 中文
中文关键词: 污水处理厂 ; 经济成本 ; 技术性能 ; 温室效应 ; 富营养化
英文关键词: wastewater treatment plant ; economic cost ; technical performance ; greenhouse effect ; eutrophication
WOS学科分类: ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
WOS研究方向: Environmental Sciences & Ecology
中文摘要: 应用技术性能、经济成本、环境影响(温室效应和富营养化效应)指标,对采用氧化沟、ICEAS、3AMBR和A~2O 4种不同工艺的昆明市7座污水处理厂运行进行综合评价。各污水处理厂对BOD、SS和NH_4~+-N都具有较高的去除率,在91%以上;COD去除率在86%以上;TP去除率在86%?96%之间;TN去除率在59% ~76%之间。污水处理厂的运行经济成本同工艺类型和进出水水质密切相关,经济成本主要来源于电耗;采用3AMBR工艺的污水处理厂经济成本远高于其他污水处理厂。温室气体主要来源于电耗和出水一氧化二氮释放,其中3AMBR工艺具有最大的温室气体释放量。出水污染物中对富营养化效应贡献最大的为硝酸盐,不同类型工艺出水造成的富营养化效应差别不大。结合污染物去除性能和综合成本进行分析,ICEAS工艺具有最好的综合性能,而3AMBR工艺综合性能相对较差。
英文摘要: The performance of seven wastewater treatments with four different treatment processes types (oxidation ditch,ICEASE,3 AMBR and A20) in Kunming was evaluated with indicators including technical performance,economic cost, and environmental impact (global warming and eutrophication). The results showed that all wastewater treatment plants had good performance in the removal of BOD,SS,and NH_4~+ -N with the removal percentage above 91 %,the removal percentage of COD was over 86%,the removal percentage of TP was in the range of 86% ?96%, and the removal percentage of TN was in the range of 56% ~ 76%. Economic costs were mainly contributed from energy consumption and were closely related to the treatment process and water quality of both influent and effluent ; the operation cost of 3 AMBR was much higher than that of other treatment processes. Greenhouse gases emission was mainly from energy consumption and nitrous oxide emission from the effluent, and 3 AMBR had the highest greenhouse gases emission among all treatment processes. The eutrophication effect of the effluent was mainly contributed by nitrate and was highly affected by treatment processes. Combined with the pollutant removal performance and comprehensive cost, ICEAS had the best comprehensive performance while 3AMBR had the relatively worse comprehensive performance.
资源类型: 期刊论文
标识符: http://119.78.100.158/handle/2HF3EXSE/147934
Appears in Collections:气候变化与战略

Files in This Item:

There are no files associated with this item.


作者单位: 1.清华大学深圳研究生院, 国家环境微生物利用与安全控制重点实验室, 深圳, 广东 518055, 中国
2.滇池水务股份有限公司, 昆明, 云南 650228, 中国

Recommended Citation:
李波,吴光学,胡洪营,等. 昆明市污水处理厂运行综合评价[J]. 环境工程学报,2014-01-01,8(10):1035-1042
Service
Recommend this item
Sava as my favorate item
Show this item's statistics
Export Endnote File
Google Scholar
Similar articles in Google Scholar
[李波]'s Articles
[吴光学]'s Articles
[胡洪营]'s Articles
百度学术
Similar articles in Baidu Scholar
[李波]'s Articles
[吴光学]'s Articles
[胡洪营]'s Articles
CSDL cross search
Similar articles in CSDL Cross Search
[李波]‘s Articles
[吴光学]‘s Articles
[胡洪营]‘s Articles
Related Copyright Policies
Null
收藏/分享
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

Items in IR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.