globalchange  > 气候变化与战略
CSCD记录号: CSCD:5534983
论文题名:
建筑生命周期物化碳计算方法比较分析
其他题名: Comparative Analysis of Calculation Method of Embodied Carbon during Life Cycle of Buildings
作者: 申立银; 陈进道; 严行; 吴雅; 廖世菊
刊名: 建筑科学
ISSN: 1002-8528
出版年: 2015
卷: 31, 期:4, 页码:1484-1495
语种: 中文
中文关键词: 建筑物化碳 ; 碳排放 ; 生命周期分析 ; 比较分析
英文关键词: embodied carbon of buildings ; carbon emission ; analysis of life cycle ; comparative analysis
WOS学科分类: ARCHITECTURE ; ENERGY FUELS
WOS研究方向: Architecture ; Energy & Fuels
中文摘要: 温室气体排放引起的全球变暖已成为国际社会关注的焦点问题,而建筑在其建造活动和相关材料生产过程产生大量的温室气体。为了采取正确的措施减少建筑碳排放,准确量化建筑的碳排放尤为重要。本文对已有的建筑生命周期物化碳的相关研究进行梳理,分析了目前常用的3种建筑生命周期物化碳计算方法(基于过程法、投入产出法和混合法), 并从系统边界、数据特点和计算的准确性3个方面对这3种方法进行比较。研究结果表明,基于过程法操作性较好、应用最广泛,但准确性低;投入产出法应用比较少,其结果过于粗略;混合法计算准确性较高,但因操作较复杂,应用也比较少。
英文摘要: Global warming caused by discharge of greenhouse gas has become a focus of concern for international community. Plenty of greenhouse gas is generated during the construction of buildings and relevant production of materials. To reduce carbon emission of buildings using correct measures,it is particularly important to quantify the carbon emission of buildings accurately. By referring to existing studies on embodied carbon during life cycle of buildings,three common methods for calculating embodied carbon during life cycle of buildings (process-based method,input-output method and hybrid method) were analyzed. The methods were compared in terms of system boundary,data characteristics and accuracy of calculation. The results showed that the process-based method features good operability,wide application but low accuracy; the input-output method is seldom applied and its results are excessively rough; the hybrid method presents high accuracy of calculation,but it is also rarely used due to complicated operation. The findings provide a theoretical basis for the selection of proper calculation method of embodied carbon during life cycle of buildings and the effective analysis of Embodied carbon during life cycle of buildings.
资源类型: 期刊论文
标识符: http://119.78.100.158/handle/2HF3EXSE/149527
Appears in Collections:气候变化与战略

Files in This Item:

There are no files associated with this item.


作者单位: 重庆大学建设管理与房地产学院, 重庆 400045, 中国

Recommended Citation:
申立银,陈进道,严行,等. 建筑生命周期物化碳计算方法比较分析[J]. 建筑科学,2015-01-01,31(4):1484-1495
Service
Recommend this item
Sava as my favorate item
Show this item's statistics
Export Endnote File
Google Scholar
Similar articles in Google Scholar
[申立银]'s Articles
[陈进道]'s Articles
[严行]'s Articles
百度学术
Similar articles in Baidu Scholar
[申立银]'s Articles
[陈进道]'s Articles
[严行]'s Articles
CSDL cross search
Similar articles in CSDL Cross Search
[申立银]‘s Articles
[陈进道]‘s Articles
[严行]‘s Articles
Related Copyright Policies
Null
收藏/分享
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

Items in IR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.