globalchange  > 气候变化事实与影响
CSCD记录号: CSCD:6546307
论文题名:
主动参与还是被动选择:农户村域环境治理参与行为及效果差异分析
其他题名: Active Participation or Passive Choice: Analysis of the Participation Behaviors and Effects of Villege Domain Environmental Governance
作者: 唐林1; 罗小锋1; 黄炎忠1; 余威震1; 张俊飚1
刊名: 长江流域资源与环境
ISSN: 1004-8227
出版年: 2019
卷: 28, 期:7, 页码:96-102
语种: 中文
中文关键词: 主动参与 ; 被动选择 ; 村域环境治理 ; Heckman 模型 ; Oaxaca-Blinder 反事实分解
英文关键词: active participation ; passive choice ; village domain environmental governance ; Heckman model ; Oaxaca-Blinder counterfactual decomposition
WOS学科分类: AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS POLICY
WOS研究方向: Agriculture
中文摘要: 基于湖北省的调研数据,分析农户参与村域环境治理的行为及行为效果,并运用Heckman两阶段模型加以实证检验。结果发现:是否为村干部、家庭总人口、家庭年收入、家庭耕地面积、行为认知、环境状况评价、气候变化感知以及政府激励是农户参与村域环境治理的关键因素。受教育年限、环境容忍度、行为认知、环境状况评价以及气候变化感知则对农户环境治理参与行为效果有显著影响。在此基础上,从农户参与环境治理的行为动机出发,并借助Oaxaca-Blinder反事实分解方法,探讨主动参与和被动参与两种行为的效果差异及产生差异的原因。结果显示,禀赋差异和禀赋回报率差异均致使主动参与者的行为效果均值( 3. 729)显著高于被动参与者的行为效果均值( 3. 027) 。其中,受教育年限、行为认知和气候变化感知的差异是主动参与者和被动参与者行为效果存在差异的主要因素。
英文摘要: Based on survey data from Hubei Province,this paper focused on the behavior and behavioral effects of farmers participating in village domain environmental governance,and the Heckman two-stage model was used for empirical test. The results show that whether it is the village cadres,the total family population,family annual income,family arable land area, behavioral cognition, environmental status assessment, climate change perception and government incentives are the key factors for farmers to participate in village domain environmental governance. Besides,the years of education,environmental tolerance,behavioral cognition,environmental status assessment and climate change perception have a significant impact on the effects of farmers'environmental governance participation behavior. On these basis,so having considered about the behavioral motives of farmers who participate in environmental governance,this paper discusses the differences between the effects of active participation and passive participation with the help of Oaxaca-Blinder counterfactual decomposition method. And then trying to find the cause of the differences. Finally,the findings reveal that both the difference in endowment and the rate of return on endowment resulted in the mean behavioral effect of active participants ( 3. 729) being significantly higher than the mean of behavioral effects of passive participants ( 3. 027 ) . Among them,the differences in years of education,behavioral cognition and climate change perception are the main factors that influence the behavioral effects of active participants and passive participants.
资源类型: 期刊论文
标识符: http://119.78.100.158/handle/2HF3EXSE/156304
Appears in Collections:气候变化事实与影响

Files in This Item:

There are no files associated with this item.


作者单位: 1.华中农业大学经济管理学院
2.湖北农村发展研究中心,
3., 武汉
4.武汉, 湖北
5.湖北 430070
6.430070, 中国

Recommended Citation:
唐林,罗小锋,黄炎忠,等. 主动参与还是被动选择:农户村域环境治理参与行为及效果差异分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境,2019-01-01,28(7):96-102
Service
Recommend this item
Sava as my favorate item
Show this item's statistics
Export Endnote File
Google Scholar
Similar articles in Google Scholar
[唐林]'s Articles
[罗小锋]'s Articles
[黄炎忠]'s Articles
百度学术
Similar articles in Baidu Scholar
[唐林]'s Articles
[罗小锋]'s Articles
[黄炎忠]'s Articles
CSDL cross search
Similar articles in CSDL Cross Search
[唐林]‘s Articles
[罗小锋]‘s Articles
[黄炎忠]‘s Articles
Related Copyright Policies
Null
收藏/分享
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

Items in IR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.