globalchange  > 气候变化事实与影响
CSCD记录号: CSCD:6531700
论文题名:
五结合生态温室生命周期评价及比较分析
其他题名: LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT AND COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF FIVE-IN-ONE'ECOLOGICAL GREENHOUSE
作者: 梁龙1; 杭胜2; 彭澎2; 赵桂慎2
刊名: 中国农业资源与区划
ISSN: 1005-9121
出版年: 2019
卷: 40, 期:5, 页码:979-988
语种: 中文
中文关键词: 五结合 ; 生态温室 ; 生命周期评价 ; 环境指数 ; 可持续发展
英文关键词: Five-in-One ; ecological greenhouse ; life cycle assessment ; environmental impact ; sustainable development
WOS学科分类: AGRICULTURE MULTIDISCIPLINARY
WOS研究方向: Agriculture
中文摘要: [目的]通过五结合生态温室生命周期评价及比较分析,发现各类温室潜在的环境影响及其关键要素,探索各模式改进提升的重点及未来发展方向。[方法]应用生命周期评价方法,将五结合生态温室与国内典型地区节能日光温室和国外同类模式进行环境综合评价,在此基础上分析五结合生态温室替代常规模式的可能性。[结果]较节能日光温室,生态温室单位产品的能源消耗、水资源消耗、气候变化、潜在的环境酸化、富营养化、人体、水体和土壤毒性分别降低了27%,64%,27%,32%, 43%,97%,99%和99%,综合环境指数降低98.6%,环境效益大幅度提升。与国外同类模式相比,由于充分利用太阳能,中国常规模式在降低能源消耗和温室气体减排方面优势明显,其他各项环境指数与国外相比还存在较大差距,但五结合生态温室各项指数全面优于或接近国外同类模式。[结论]以五结合生态温室为代表的生态模式能够解决国内外温室发展面临的众多瓶颈问题,具有极大的发展潜力和应用价值。
英文摘要: Greenhouse production ( GP) is an important mode in China and other regions. However,there are many problems due to high energy,fertilizers and pesticides used in greenhouse production. Thus,both China and other areas have been improving to create more productive and economic efficiency with lower inputs as well. From the perspective of circular agriculture,we designed a " Five-in-One" ecological model ( Model 1),which was an integrated system involving planting,breeding,biogas and rain-collecting subsystems. Then,based on the life cycle assessment ( LCA) methodology,taking one ton vegetable as functional unit,we compared it with the two conventional model productions in Hebei province ( Tomato-celery planting,Model 2) and Shandong province ( Tomato- tomato planting,Model 3). The results showed that compared to Model 3,all the environmental impact index involving energy consumption ( EC),water resource consumption ( WRC),climate change ( CC),acidification potential ( AP) and eutrophication potential ( EP),human toxicity potential ( HTP),flesh water toxicity potential ( WTP) and terrestrial toxicity potential ( TTP) were decreased by 27%,64%,27%,32%,43%,97%,99% and 99%,respectively,and the comprehensive value decreased by 98.6%. Compared to similar researches in other regions generally,the two indicators of conventional greenhouse production involving EC and CC have advantages, while for other index,the conventional model existed huge challenges to improve in future. However,all these index of " Five-in-One",except individual indicator,were better than those of similar researches. Thus,ecological mode has great potentials to develop in both China and other areas to promote sustainable development.
资源类型: 期刊论文
标识符: http://119.78.100.158/handle/2HF3EXSE/156370
Appears in Collections:气候变化事实与影响

Files in This Item:

There are no files associated with this item.


作者单位: 1.贵州财经大学公共管理学院
2.中国农业大学资源与环境学院,
3., 贵阳
4.,
5.北京 550025
6.100193
7.中国农业大学资源与环境学院, 北京 100193, 中国

Recommended Citation:
梁龙,杭胜,彭澎,等. 五结合生态温室生命周期评价及比较分析[J]. 中国农业资源与区划,2019-01-01,40(5):979-988
Service
Recommend this item
Sava as my favorate item
Show this item's statistics
Export Endnote File
Google Scholar
Similar articles in Google Scholar
[梁龙]'s Articles
[杭胜]'s Articles
[彭澎]'s Articles
百度学术
Similar articles in Baidu Scholar
[梁龙]'s Articles
[杭胜]'s Articles
[彭澎]'s Articles
CSDL cross search
Similar articles in CSDL Cross Search
[梁龙]‘s Articles
[杭胜]‘s Articles
[彭澎]‘s Articles
Related Copyright Policies
Null
收藏/分享
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

Items in IR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.