globalchange  > 气候变化与战略
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111773
论文题名:
An empirical analysis of energy intensity and the role of policy instruments
作者: Azhgaliyeva D.; Liu Y.; Liddle B.
刊名: Energy Policy
ISSN: 03014215
出版年: 2020
卷: 145
语种: 英语
中文关键词: Common correlated effects mean group estimator ; Energy efficiency ; Energy intensity ; Energy policy ; Non-OECD countries
英文关键词: Economics ; Energy policy ; Cross sectional dependence ; Direct investments ; Empirical analysis ; Energy intensity ; Non-OECD countries ; Non-stationarities ; Policy instruments ; Sustainable economic growth ; Investments ; economic growth ; empirical analysis ; energy policy ; energy use ; Gross Domestic Product ; OECD ; policy analysis ; policy approach ; policy making ; standard (reference) ; sustainability
英文摘要: The reduction of energy intensity is important for sustainable economic growth, especially in non-OECD countries where energy demand growth is high. Understanding the impact of policies on energy intensity can help policy-makers to reduce energy intensity. Using empirical methods and cross-country data from 44 countries over the period 1990–2016, we study the determinants of energy intensity. The common correlated effects mean group estimator is employed since it addresses nonstationarity, cross-sectional dependence, and heterogeneity—all three of which exist in the data. Both GDP per capita and economy-wide energy prices are shown to be negatively associated with energy intensity. The empirical results provide evidence that several policy instruments are effective in reducing energy intensity: (i) standards, and labeling; (ii) government direct investment; (iii) strategic planning and support; (iv) fiscal measures/taxes; and (v) grants and subsidies. The duration of the policy is more important than the mere existence of the policy in demonstrating the policy's effectiveness. © 2020 Elsevier Ltd
Citation statistics:
资源类型: 期刊论文
标识符: http://119.78.100.158/handle/2HF3EXSE/167003
Appears in Collections:气候变化与战略

Files in This Item:

There are no files associated with this item.


作者单位: Asian Development Bank Institute, Kasumigaseki Building 8F, 3-2-5 Kasumigaseki, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, 100-6008, Japan; Visiting Fellow in Leadership, Organisations and Behaviour, Henley Business School, University of Reading, Whiteknights, Reading, United Kingdom; African Development Bank, Abidjan, Cote d'Ivoire; School of Management, Harbin Institute of Technology, China; Energy Studies Institute, National University of Singapore, 29 Heng Mui Keng Terrace119620, Singapore

Recommended Citation:
Azhgaliyeva D.,Liu Y.,Liddle B.. An empirical analysis of energy intensity and the role of policy instruments[J]. Energy Policy,2020-01-01,145
Service
Recommend this item
Sava as my favorate item
Show this item's statistics
Export Endnote File
Google Scholar
Similar articles in Google Scholar
[Azhgaliyeva D.]'s Articles
[Liu Y.]'s Articles
[Liddle B.]'s Articles
百度学术
Similar articles in Baidu Scholar
[Azhgaliyeva D.]'s Articles
[Liu Y.]'s Articles
[Liddle B.]'s Articles
CSDL cross search
Similar articles in CSDL Cross Search
[Azhgaliyeva D.]‘s Articles
[Liu Y.]‘s Articles
[Liddle B.]‘s Articles
Related Copyright Policies
Null
收藏/分享
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

Items in IR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.