globalchange  > 气候变化与战略
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111693
论文题名:
On the socio-technical potential for onshore wind in Europe: A response to Enevoldsen et al. (2019), Energy Policy, 132, 1092-1100
作者: McKenna R.; Ryberg D.S.; Staffell I.; Hahmann A.N.; Schmidt J.; Heinrichs H.; Höltinger S.; Lilliestam J.; Pfenninger S.; Robinius M.; Stolten D.; Tröndle T.; Wehrle S.; Weinand J.M.
刊名: Energy Policy
ISSN: 03014215
出版年: 2020
卷: 145
语种: 英语
中文关键词: Barriers ; Feasibility ; Onshore wind ; Public acceptance ; Resource assessment
英文关键词: Energy policy ; Capacity factors ; General publics ; Literature reviews ; Multiple issue ; Sociotechnical ; Spatial resolution ; Wind energy resource assessments ; Wind resources ; Wind power
英文摘要: A recent article in this journal claimed to assess the socio-technical potential for onshore wind energy in Europe. We find the article to be severely flawed and raise concerns in five general areas. Firstly, the term socio-technical is not precisely defined, and is used by the authors to refer to a potential that others term as merely technical. Secondly, the study fails to account for over a decade of research in wind energy resource assessments. Thirdly, there are multiple issues with the use of input data and, because the study is opaque about many details, the effect of these errors cannot be reproduced. Fourthly, the method assumes a very high wind turbine capacity density of 10.73 MW/km2 across 40% of the land area in Europe with a generic 30% capacity factor. Fifthly, the authors find an implausibly high onshore wind potential, with 120% more capacity and 70% more generation than the highest results given elsewhere in the literature. Overall, we conclude that new research at higher spatial resolutions can make a valuable contribution to wind resource potential assessments. However, due to the missing literature review, the lack of transparency and the overly simplistic methodology, Enevoldsen et al. (2019) potentially mislead fellow scientists, policy makers and the general public. © 2020 Elsevier Ltd
Citation statistics:
资源类型: 期刊论文
标识符: http://119.78.100.158/handle/2HF3EXSE/167351
Appears in Collections:气候变化与战略

Files in This Item:

There are no files associated with this item.


作者单位: Energy Systems Analysis, DTU Management, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark; School of Engineering, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom; Institute for Techno-economic Systems Analysis (IEK-3), Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich, Germany; Centre for Environmental Policy, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom; Department of Wind Energy, Technical University of Denmark, Roskilde, Denmark; Institute for Sustainable Economic Development, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Austria; Institute for Advanced Sustainability Studies, Potsdam, Germany; Department of Environmental Systems Science, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; Chair of Energy Economics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany

Recommended Citation:
McKenna R.,Ryberg D.S.,Staffell I.,et al. On the socio-technical potential for onshore wind in Europe: A response to Enevoldsen et al. (2019), Energy Policy, 132, 1092-1100[J]. Energy Policy,2020-01-01,145
Service
Recommend this item
Sava as my favorate item
Show this item's statistics
Export Endnote File
Google Scholar
Similar articles in Google Scholar
[McKenna R.]'s Articles
[Ryberg D.S.]'s Articles
[Staffell I.]'s Articles
百度学术
Similar articles in Baidu Scholar
[McKenna R.]'s Articles
[Ryberg D.S.]'s Articles
[Staffell I.]'s Articles
CSDL cross search
Similar articles in CSDL Cross Search
[McKenna R.]‘s Articles
[Ryberg D.S.]‘s Articles
[Staffell I.]‘s Articles
Related Copyright Policies
Null
收藏/分享
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

Items in IR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.