| DOI: | 10.1016/j.enpol.2019.111159
|
| 论文题名: | Response to Santeramo and Searle (2019) |
| 作者: | Taheripour F.; Delgado M.S.; Tyner W.E.
|
| 刊名: | Energy Policy
|
| ISSN: | 03014215
|
| 出版年: | 2020
|
| 卷: | 137 | | 语种: | 英语
|
| 英文关键词: | Biofuels
; Elasticity
; Land use
; Biofuel production
; California
; Cross-price elasticity
; Land-use change
; Oil market
; Renewable fuels
; Soy oil
; Palm oil
|
| 英文摘要: | In a recent article, Santeramo and Searle (2019: Henceforth San-Sea) argued that the linkages between the soy oil and palm oil markets and their land use consequences could negatively affect the climate performance of the US Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) and California's Low Fuel Standard. To support their arguments, San-Sea estimated the own and cross-price elasticities for supplies of soy and palm oils in the US. These authors refer to a valid point that induced land use changes may negatively impact emissions savings due to biofuels. However, their estimated elasticities provide no new insight on this issue. In addition, their approach, findings, analysis, and conclusion are subject to several deficiencies and limitations. These authors provide no new evidence for the link between biofuel production and land use change due to substitution among vegetable oils. In what follows, we reflect on some important facts and concerns. © 2019 Elsevier Ltd |
| Citation statistics: |
|
| 资源类型: | 期刊论文
|
| 标识符: | http://119.78.100.158/handle/2HF3EXSE/167510
|
| Appears in Collections: | 气候变化与战略
|
|
There are no files associated with this item.
|
|
作者单位: | Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, United States
|
| Recommended Citation: | |
Taheripour F.,Delgado M.S.,Tyner W.E.. Response to Santeramo and Searle (2019)[J]. Energy Policy,2020-01-01,137
|
|
|