globalchange  > 气候变化与战略
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112303
论文题名:
Do public review processes reflect public input? A study of hydraulic fracturing reviews in Australia and Canada
作者: Colville S.; Steen J.; Gosine R.
刊名: Energy Policy
ISSN: 03014215
出版年: 2021
卷: 155
语种: 英语
中文关键词: Computer-aided text analysis ; Hydraulic fracturing ; Inquiry reports ; Leximancer ; Public consultation
英文关键词: Computer aided analysis ; Fracture ; Social aspects ; Australia ; Computer-aided text analyse ; High volumes ; Inquiry report ; Leximance ; Multiple stakeholders ; Panel report ; Policy issues ; Public consultation ; Public review process ; Hydraulic fracturing ; economic development ; hydraulic fracturing ; industrial development ; software ; Australia ; Canada
英文摘要: High volume hydraulic fracturing (HVHF) is a contentious issue worldwide. It is a crucial policy issue due to its significant impact on multiple stakeholders and, as a result, requires extensive public consultation and exposure. One process deployed in some liberal democracies to address this controversy is forming an independent expert review panel to receive public submissions and then prepare a report for policymakers. Our paper investigated how closely the review panel reports reflect and weigh the public submissions and to explore the subjects in which there is agreement or disagreement across the various reports. This study used the Leximancer automated text analysis software to compare key themes in the sub-national reports and public submissions. We find a consistent pattern across jurisdictions of public submissions reflecting health and environment while official reports focus on industry and economic development. There is a wide range of congruency between the jurisdictions on the capacity of the expert reports to reflect public opinion. Following from this divergence, we aim to contribute to more meaningful discussions regarding effective communication strategies between the government and the public to ensure review panel reports fairly represent public concerns. © 2021 The Author(s)
Citation statistics:
资源类型: 期刊论文
标识符: http://119.78.100.158/handle/2HF3EXSE/167735
Appears in Collections:气候变化与战略

Files in This Item:

There are no files associated with this item.


作者单位: University of Queensland, St Lucia, Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia; University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada; Memorial University of Newfoundland, St John, Newfoundland, A1C 5S7, Canada

Recommended Citation:
Colville S.,Steen J.,Gosine R.. Do public review processes reflect public input? A study of hydraulic fracturing reviews in Australia and Canada[J]. Energy Policy,2021-01-01,155
Service
Recommend this item
Sava as my favorate item
Show this item's statistics
Export Endnote File
Google Scholar
Similar articles in Google Scholar
[Colville S.]'s Articles
[Steen J.]'s Articles
[Gosine R.]'s Articles
百度学术
Similar articles in Baidu Scholar
[Colville S.]'s Articles
[Steen J.]'s Articles
[Gosine R.]'s Articles
CSDL cross search
Similar articles in CSDL Cross Search
[Colville S.]‘s Articles
[Steen J.]‘s Articles
[Gosine R.]‘s Articles
Related Copyright Policies
Null
收藏/分享
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

Items in IR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.