globalchange  > 气候变化与战略
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112375
论文题名:
Can different approaches to funding household energy efficiency deliver on economic and social policy objectives? ECO and alternatives in the UK
作者: Katris A.; Turner K.
刊名: Energy Policy
ISSN: 03014215
出版年: 2021
卷: 155
语种: 英语
中文关键词: Computable general equilibrium ; Economic sustainability ; Energy efficiency ; Energy policy ; Socialising costs
英文关键词: Binary alloys ; Costs ; Economic analysis ; Economic and social effects ; Energy policy ; Taxation ; Computable general equilibrium ; Economic sustainability ; Efficiency gain ; Energy ; Energy companies ; Fundings ; Policy objectives ; Social policy ; Socializing cost ; Energy efficiency ; computable general equilibrium analysis ; energy efficiency ; energy market ; energy policy ; numerical model ; social policy ; sustainability ; United Kingdom
英文摘要: Residential energy efficiency is a core element of the decarbonisation policy in many nations. In the UK, the established approach to enabling efficiency gains through centralised retrofitting programmes involves socialising costs via consumer energy bills through the Energy Company Obligation (ECO). One UK policy concern is whether less affluent households should receive greater access to ECO funding. However, there is a broader concern that the use of constrained public resources should be justified through wider and sustained economic returns emerging. Here, we consider the (centralised) ECO approach to cost recovery alongside alternative (decentralised) approaches to delivering energy efficiency programmes that either pass costs to beneficiary households or fully socialise costs via income tax. We find the key drivers of both household and wider economy outcomes are the absolute levels of resources actually devoted to enabling efficiency gains and household disposable income freed up to power expansionary processes. The latter in particular brings challenges and trade-offs in terms of meeting both economic performance and social policy objectives, given that resources targeted at higher income households can ultimately free up more real spending ability and sustain greater gains in GDP, employment and household incomes. © 2021 The Author(s)
Citation statistics:
资源类型: 期刊论文
标识符: http://119.78.100.158/handle/2HF3EXSE/167859
Appears in Collections:气候变化与战略

Files in This Item:

There are no files associated with this item.


作者单位: Centre for Energy Policy, School of Government and Public Policy, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom

Recommended Citation:
Katris A.,Turner K.. Can different approaches to funding household energy efficiency deliver on economic and social policy objectives? ECO and alternatives in the UK[J]. Energy Policy,2021-01-01,155
Service
Recommend this item
Sava as my favorate item
Show this item's statistics
Export Endnote File
Google Scholar
Similar articles in Google Scholar
[Katris A.]'s Articles
[Turner K.]'s Articles
百度学术
Similar articles in Baidu Scholar
[Katris A.]'s Articles
[Turner K.]'s Articles
CSDL cross search
Similar articles in CSDL Cross Search
[Katris A.]‘s Articles
[Turner K.]‘s Articles
Related Copyright Policies
Null
收藏/分享
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

Items in IR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.