DOI: | 10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112384
|
论文题名: | Getting to India's electric vehicle targets cost-effectively: To subsidize or not, and how? |
作者: | Shrimali G.
|
刊名: | Energy Policy
|
ISSN: | 03014215
|
出版年: | 2021
|
卷: | 156 | 语种: | 英语
|
中文关键词: | Cost-effectiveness
; Electric vehicles
; India
; Net present value
; Policy design
; Total cost of ownership
|
英文关键词: | Automobiles
; Costs
; Electric vehicles
; Internal combustion engines
; Trucks
; Cost effective
; Haul trucks
; India
; Lifetime costs
; Long haul
; Policy design
; Target cost
; The net present value (NPV)
; Total cost of ownership
; Vehicle targets
; Cost effectiveness
; combustion
; cost analysis
; electric vehicle
; India
|
英文摘要: | In the context of India's ambitious electric vehicle targets, we examine two related questions. First, based on lifetime costs, which electric vehicles need to be subsidized? Second, based on lifetime subsidies, which subsidy option would be the most cost-effective? We find that electric two-wheelers, three-wheelers, four-wheeler-taxis, and buses do not need to be subsidized given that they are already cost competitive with comparable vehicles using internal combustion engines. We also find that personal cars and long-haul trucks need to be subsidized significantly, by one-third to one-half of the upfront costs. Finally, we find that an upfront subsidy is the most cost-effective subsidy option, followed by a per kilometer subsidy, which is effectively 19–31% costlier, whereas financing subsidies are found to be the least cost effective. Our results suggest that a cost-effective policy in India would be to subsidize only personal cars and long-haul trucks, while using the upfront subsidies. © 2021 Elsevier Ltd |
Citation statistics: |
|
资源类型: | 期刊论文
|
标识符: | http://119.78.100.158/handle/2HF3EXSE/168021
|
Appears in Collections: | 气候变化与战略
|
There are no files associated with this item.
|
作者单位: | Stanford University, United States
|
Recommended Citation: |
Shrimali G.. Getting to India's electric vehicle targets cost-effectively: To subsidize or not, and how?[J]. Energy Policy,2021-01-01,156
|
|
|