globalchange  > 气候变化与战略
DOI: 10.1007/s11069-019-03806-x
论文题名:
Comparison of GA-BP and PSO-BP neural network models with initial BP model for rainfall-induced landslides risk assessment in regional scale: a case study in Sichuan, China
作者: Zhu C.; Zhang J.; Liu Y.; Ma D.; Li M.; Xiang B.
刊名: Natural Hazards
ISSN: 0921030X
出版年: 2020
卷: 100, 期:1
起始页码: 173
结束页码: 204
语种: 英语
中文关键词: Artificial neural networks ; Genetic algorithm ; GIS ; Landslide risk analysis ; Particle swarm optimization
英文关键词: accuracy assessment ; artificial neural network ; back propagation ; comparative study ; induced response ; landslide ; rainfall ; reliability analysis ; risk assessment ; China ; Sichuan
英文摘要: With the increase in inclement weather conditions, many countries would experience more and more landslide hazards in the process of planning, designing and construction for engineering projects, especially in the mountainous regions. How to quickly and accurately assess potential landslide risk in a large region (> 10,000 km2) is facing challenge due to its complex geological conditions and large amount of landslides in the region. To optimize the accuracy of the existing models for a large region, in this study, the genetic algorithm (GA) and particle swarm optimization (PSO) are, respectively, coupled with the backpropagation (BP) neural network to determine the initial weights and thresholds in the BP neural network, which can be called GA-BP model and PSO-BP model. To show the reliability and accuracy of the new models in large region, the BP, GA-BP and PSO-BP models are evaluated based on root mean square error (RMSE), coefficient of determination (R2), Kappa coefficient (k), receiver operating characteristic (ROC), training time and condition factor weights by using 100 landslide samples from Sichuan Province, China. Results show that the RMSE values of the GA-BP model and the PSO model are, respectively, 22.6% and 5.1% lower than those of the BP model; the R2 values of the GA-BP model and the PSO model are, respectively, 24.9% and 6.2% higher than those of the BP model; the k values of the GA-BP model and the PSO model are, respectively, 44.3% and 15.4% higher than those of the BP model, and the areas under ROC of the GA-BP model and the PSO model are, respectively, 32.4% and 9.6% larger than those of the BP model. The GA-BP model and the PSO-BP model have better accuracy in the assessment of the overall risk value and the risk-level classification. The difference of the training time is small, and the sequences of condition factor weights given by the three models are consistent. In general, the GA-BP model is more effective for landslide risk assessment in large region. At last, this study gives proposed models under different engineering conditions, which can increase efficiency of the risk assessment for landslides. © 2019, Springer Nature B.V.
Citation statistics:
资源类型: 期刊论文
标识符: http://119.78.100.158/handle/2HF3EXSE/168857
Appears in Collections:气候变化与战略

Files in This Item:

There are no files associated with this item.


作者单位: Key Laboratory of Transportation Tunnel Engineering, Ministry of Education, School of Civil Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, 610031, China; Highway Planning, Survey, Design and Research Institute of Sichuan Provincial Department of Transportation, Chengdu, 610056, China

Recommended Citation:
Zhu C.,Zhang J.,Liu Y.,et al. Comparison of GA-BP and PSO-BP neural network models with initial BP model for rainfall-induced landslides risk assessment in regional scale: a case study in Sichuan, China[J]. Natural Hazards,2020-01-01,100(1)
Service
Recommend this item
Sava as my favorate item
Show this item's statistics
Export Endnote File
Google Scholar
Similar articles in Google Scholar
[Zhu C.]'s Articles
[Zhang J.]'s Articles
[Liu Y.]'s Articles
百度学术
Similar articles in Baidu Scholar
[Zhu C.]'s Articles
[Zhang J.]'s Articles
[Liu Y.]'s Articles
CSDL cross search
Similar articles in CSDL Cross Search
[Zhu C.]‘s Articles
[Zhang J.]‘s Articles
[Liu Y.]‘s Articles
Related Copyright Policies
Null
收藏/分享
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

Items in IR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.