globalchange  > 过去全球变化的重建
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0096480
论文题名:
Identifying the Science and Technology Dimensions of Emerging Public Policy Issues through Horizon Scanning
作者: Miles Parker; Andrew Acland; Harry J. Armstrong; Jim R. Bellingham; Jessica Bland; Helen C. Bodmer; Simon Burall; Sarah Castell; Jason Chilvers; David D. Cleevely; David Cope; Lucia Costanzo; James A. Dolan; Robert Doubleday; Wai Yi Feng; H. Charles J. Godfray; David A. Good; Jonathan Grant; Nick Green; Arnoud J. Groen; Tim T. Guilliams; Sunjai Gupta; Amanda C. Hall; Adam Heathfield; Ulrike Hotopp; Gary Kass; Tim Leeder; Fiona A. Lickorish; Leila M. Lueshi; Chris Magee; Tiago Mata; Tony McBride; Natasha McCarthy; Alan Mercer; Ross Neilson; Jackie Ouchikh; Edward J. Oughton; David Oxenham; Helen Pallett; James Palmer; Jeff Patmore; Judith Petts; Jan Pinkerton; Richard Ploszek; Alan Pratt; Sophie A. Rocks; Neil Stansfield; Elizabeth Surkovic; Christopher P. Tyler; Andrew R. Watkinson; Jonny Wentworth; Rebecca Willis; Patrick K. A. Wollner; Kim Worts; William J. Sutherland
刊名: PLOS ONE
ISSN: 1932-6203
出版年: 2014
发表日期: 2014-5-30
卷: 9, 期:5
语种: 英语
英文关键词: Science policy ; Public policy ; Climate change ; Human learning ; Decision making ; Alternative energy ; Transportation infrastructure ; National security
英文摘要: Public policy requires public support, which in turn implies a need to enable the public not just to understand policy but also to be engaged in its development. Where complex science and technology issues are involved in policy making, this takes time, so it is important to identify emerging issues of this type and prepare engagement plans. In our horizon scanning exercise, we used a modified Delphi technique [1]. A wide group of people with interests in the science and policy interface (drawn from policy makers, policy adviser, practitioners, the private sector and academics) elicited a long list of emergent policy issues in which science and technology would feature strongly and which would also necessitate public engagement as policies are developed. This was then refined to a short list of top priorities for policy makers. Thirty issues were identified within broad areas of business and technology; energy and environment; government, politics and education; health, healthcare, population and aging; information, communication, infrastructure and transport; and public safety and national security.
URL: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0096480&type=printable
Citation statistics:
资源类型: 期刊论文
标识符: http://119.78.100.158/handle/2HF3EXSE/18722
Appears in Collections:过去全球变化的重建
影响、适应和脆弱性
科学计划与规划
气候变化与战略
全球变化的国际研究计划
气候减缓与适应
气候变化事实与影响

Files in This Item:
File Name/ File Size Content Type Version Access License
10.1371journal.pone.0096480.PDF(322KB)期刊论文作者接受稿开放获取View Download

作者单位: Centre for Science and Policy, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom;Sciencewise, Harwell, Didcot, United Kingdom;The Babraham Institute, Cambridge, United Kingdom;School of the Physical Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom;Nesta, London, United Kingdom;Department for Business, Innovation and Skills, London, United Kingdom;Involve, London, United Kingdom;Ipsos MORI, London, United Kingdom;Science, Society and Sustainability (3S) Group, School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom;Centre for Science and Policy, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom;Clare Hall, Cambridge, United Kingdom;Department for Business, Innovation and Skills, London, United Kingdom;NanoDTC, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom;Centre for Science and Policy, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom;Faculty of Education, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom;Oxford Martin Programme on the Future of Food, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom;Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom;RAND Europe, Cambridge, United Kingdom;The Royal Society, London, United Kingdom;Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom;Centre for Science and Policy, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom;Public Health England, London, United Kingdom;Department of Geographical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom;Pfizer Ltd, Kent, United Kingdom;Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, London, United Kingdom;Natural England, London, United Kingdom;University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom;Cranfield University, Cranfield, United Kingdom;Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom;Understanding Animal Research, London, United Kingdom;Department of History and Philosophy of Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom;The Royal Society, London, United Kingdom;The Royal Academy of Engineering, London, United Kingdom;Sciencewise, Harwell, Didcot, United Kingdom;Cabinet Office, London, United Kingdom;Centre for Science and Policy, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom;Cambridge Centre for Climate Change Mitigation Research (4CMR), Department of Land Economy, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom;Defence Science and Technology Laboratory, Salisbury, United Kingdom;Science, Society and Sustainability (3S) Group, School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom;Keble College, Oxford, United Kingdom;Pembroke College, Cambridge, United Kingdom;University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom;Department for Business, Innovation and Skills, London, United Kingdom;The Royal Academy of Engineering, London, United Kingdom;Home Office, London, United Kingdom;Cranfield University, Cranfield, United Kingdom;Ministry of Defence, London, United Kingdom;Government Office for Science, London, United Kingdom;Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology, London, United Kingdom;School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom;Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology, London, United Kingdom;Green Alliance, London, United Kingdom;Engineering Design Centre, Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom;Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, London, United Kingdom;Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom

Recommended Citation:
Miles Parker,Andrew Acland,Harry J. Armstrong,et al. Identifying the Science and Technology Dimensions of Emerging Public Policy Issues through Horizon Scanning[J]. PLOS ONE,2014-01-01,9(5)
Service
Recommend this item
Sava as my favorate item
Show this item's statistics
Export Endnote File
Google Scholar
Similar articles in Google Scholar
[Miles Parker]'s Articles
[Andrew Acland]'s Articles
[Harry J. Armstrong]'s Articles
百度学术
Similar articles in Baidu Scholar
[Miles Parker]'s Articles
[Andrew Acland]'s Articles
[Harry J. Armstrong]'s Articles
CSDL cross search
Similar articles in CSDL Cross Search
[Miles Parker]‘s Articles
[Andrew Acland]‘s Articles
[Harry J. Armstrong]‘s Articles
Related Copyright Policies
Null
收藏/分享
文件名: 10.1371journal.pone.0096480.PDF
格式: Adobe PDF
此文件暂不支持浏览
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

Items in IR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.