Objective To investigate differences in self-reported health among Australian women with a history of intimate partner violence (IPV) in relation to rurality of residence. Methods Data were drawn from six survey waves of the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women’s Health 1973–78 birth cohort. Self-reported general and mental health scores derived from the SF-36 scale were compared for women with a history of IPV living in metropolitan, regional and rural areas. Multivariable generalised estimating equations were constructed adjusting for income hardship, number of children, education, social support, age and marital status. Results Women with a history of IPV living in regional and rural areas had no significant differences in self-reported general health scores compared to their metropolitan counterparts. Rural women affected by IPV had slightly better self-reported mental health than equivalent women living in metropolitan or regional areas. The socio-demographic factors with the strongest association with self-reported health were income, education, social support, and number of children. Conclusions Women in regional and rural areas were no more disadvantaged, in terms of self-reported general health or mental health, than IPV affected women living in major cities in Australia.
School of Rural Medicine, University of New England, Armidale, NSW, 2351, Australia;ANU School of Medicine & Research School of Population Health, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, 0200, Australia;Research Centre for Generational Health and Ageing, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia;School of Health and Rehabilitation Services, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, 4072, Australia
Recommended Citation:
Gina Dillon,Rafat Hussain,Deborah Loxton,et al. Rurality and Self-Reported Health in Women with a History of Intimate Partner Violence[J]. PLOS ONE,2016-01-01,11(9)