Protected Areas (PAs) are a central part of biodiversity conservation strategies around the world. Today, PAs cover c15% of the Earth’s land mass and c3% of the global oceans. These numbers are expected to grow rapidly to meet the Convention on Biological Diversity’s Aichi Biodiversity target 11, which aims to see 17% and 10% of terrestrial and marine biomes protected, respectively, by 2020. This target also requires countries to ensure that PAs protect an “ecologically representative” sample of their biodiversity. At present, there is no clear definition of what desirable ecological representation looks like, or guidelines of how to standardize its assessment as the PA estate grows. We propose a systematic approach to measure ecological representation in PA networks using the Protection Equality (PE) metric, which measures how equally ecological features, such as habitats, within a country’s borders are protected. We present an R package and two Protection Equality (PE) measures; proportional to area PE, and fixed area PE, which measure the representativeness of a country’s PA network. We illustrate the PE metrics with two case studies: coral reef protection across countries and ecoregions in the Coral Triangle, and representation of ecoregions of six of the largest countries in the world. Our results provide repeatable transparency to the issue of representation in PA networks and provide a starting point for further discussion, evaluation and testing of representation metrics. They also highlight clear shortcomings in current PA networks, particularly where they are biased towards certain assemblage types or habitats. Our proposed metrics should be used to report on measuring progress towards the representation component of Aichi Target 11. The PE metrics can be used to measure the representation of any kind of ecological feature including: species, ecoregions, processes or habitats.
Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science, School of Biological Sciences, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia;ARC Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia;Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science, School of Biological Sciences, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia;ARC Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia;Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science, School of Biological Sciences, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia;ARC Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia;Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science, School of Biological Sciences, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia;ARC Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia;School of Biology, University of Leeds, Leeds, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom;Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science, School of Biological Sciences, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia;ARC Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia;The Nature Conservancy, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
Recommended Citation:
Alienor L. M. Chauvenet,Caitlin D. Kuempel,Jennifer McGowan,et al. Methods for calculating Protection Equality for conservation planning[J]. PLOS ONE,2017-01-01,12(2)