| 报告题名: | Addressing the Challenge of Global Climate Mitigation----D9.12. Summary Report |
| 作者: | Dr. Camilla Bausch; Michael Mehling, LLM
|
| 出版者: | Ecologic Institute, Germany
|
| 出版年: | 2011
|
| 发表日期: | 2011
|
| 总页数: | 59
|
| 国家: | 德国
|
| 语种: | 英语
|
| 英文关键词: | Global Environmental Law
; UNFCCC
; IPCC
; MEF
; APP
; G20
; G8
; Cartagena Dialogue
; OECD
; IEA
; REDD+
; Climate Change
; Mitigation
; Kyoto Protocol
; Emission Reduction
; CO2
; Carbon Dioxide
; Greenhouse Gases
; GHG
|
| 中文主题词: | 碳
; 二氧化碳
|
| 主题词: | CARBON
; CARBON DIOXIDE
|
| 英文摘要: | Recent years have seen the climate negotiations under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change fail to achieve a major breakthrough on climate change mitigation, and no such breakthrough is expected in the near future. In a study commissioned by the Friedrich Ebert Foundation, Dr. Camilla Bausch and Michael Mehling evaluate various venues and institutions addressing the climate challenge, and assess their influence on the future of global mitigation efforts. The study is available for download.While the UN climate negotiations were able to advance a number of issues over the last few years, they face diplomatic stalemate on an increasing range of issues relevant for successful climate change mitigation. At this point in the negotiations, an outcome conducive to ambitious climate change mitigation seems increasingly elusive: expectations for agreement on a comprehensive and legally binding treaty at the upcoming climate summit in Durban this December are rather modest.A number of alternative venues and institutions have therefore emerged to address various aspects of the climate challenge. This includes the G8 and the G20 as well as the Major Economies Forum (MEF), the Cartagena Dialogue, and others. In their paper, the authors analyze the prospects and promise of the UN negotiations and alternative processes, including the conditions under which these might complement, obstruct or even obviate each other.Drawing on a set of essential criteria that would need to be met for successful mitigation, the authors conclude that no alternative forum can currently replace the technical capacity, negotiating experience and broad backing embodied in the United Nations climate regime. Still, they anticipate that the UN process will remain slow in delivering results, and hence suggest that complementary processes offer interesting opportunities to address divisive issues and help advance complex technical discussions. An approach involving multiple fora, but centered on the UN climate regime, is therefore recommended to take forward the mitigation agenda.The paper [pdf, 2.7 MB, English] can be downloaded. |
| 资助项目: | Friedrich Ebert Foundation (FES), Germany
|
| URL: | http://www.ecologic.eu/sites/files/publication/2015/bausch-11-addressing-challenge-of-global-climae-migration_0.pdf
|
| 资源类型: | 研究报告
|
| 标识符: | http://119.78.100.158/handle/2HF3EXSE/42424
|
| Appears in Collections: | 过去全球变化的重建
影响、适应和脆弱性
科学计划与规划
气候变化与战略
全球变化的国际研究计划
气候减缓与适应
气候变化事实与影响
|
| File Name/ File Size |
Content Type |
Version |
Access |
License |
|
|---|
| bausch-11-addressing-challenge-of-global-climae-migration_0.pdf（1323KB） | 研究报告 | -- | 开放获取 | | View
Download
|
|
| Recommended Citation: | |
Dr. Camilla Bausch,Michael Mehling, LLM. Addressing the Challenge of Global Climate Mitigation----D9.12. Summary Report. 2011-01-01.
|
|
|