globalchange  > 气候变化事实与影响
DOI: doi:10.1038/nclimate2732
论文题名:
Politics: Echo chambers and false certainty
作者: Justin Farrell
刊名: Nature Climate Change
ISSN: 1758-823X
EISSN: 1758-6943
出版年: 2015-07-24
卷: Volume:5, 页码:Pages:719;720 (2015)
语种: 英语
英文关键词: Politics and international relations ; Climate change ; Sociology
英文摘要:

Climate change continues to be a controversial issue among political elites in the US. New research shows how ideological views become entrenched through 'echo chambers'.

In recent years, climate change has become a launch pad for much larger debates about who can claim scientific objectivity and authority in a democratic society. The social-scientific community has devoted a significant amount of energy to understand why the reality of anthropogenic climate change has become such a highly polarized issue, especially in the US.

So what have we learned from all of this social science? Several notable things, which include (but are not limited to) the fact that the news media plays a critical role, that think-tanks exert influence through an organized counter-movement, and that political polarization in congress shapes how the issue is debated1, 2, 3. In Nature Climate Change, Lorien Jasny and colleagues4 now suggest that many social-scientific explanations like these rely on a mechanism called echo chambers. This mechanism remains informal and has not yet been tested empirically.

The echo chamber concept describes the way in which information can be amplified and repeated within enclosed networks of ideologically similar individuals, leading to the further entrenchment of ideas and beliefs. People acquire and interpret information within their daily social networks. The structure of peoples' social worlds, and the range of information available within these worlds, can sometimes act to confirm what people already believe rather than encouraging open dialogue or critical reasoning. It does so by reinforcing and amplifying certain information, while at the same time shielding new or alternative information from penetrating communication lines between actors in the social network.

ANDREA IZZOTTI / ISTOCK / THINKSTOCK

Policymakers are likely to seek out and repeat viewpoints that are ideologically similar to their own, creating 'echo chambers' within institutions such as the United States' Congress.

  1. Akerlof, K., Rowan, K. E., Fitzgerald, D. & Cedeno, A. Y. Nature Clim. Change 2, 648654 (2012).
  2. Jacques, P. J., Dunlap, R. E. & Freeman, M. Environ. Polit. 17, 349385 (2008).
  3. Fisher, D. R., Waggle, J. & Liefeld, P. Am. Behav. Sci. 57, 7092 (2013).
  4. Jasny, L., Waggle, J. & Fisher, D. Nature Clim. Change 5, 782786 (2015).

Download references

Affiliations

  1. Justin Farrell is in the Yale School of Forestry & Environmental Studies, Yale University, 195 Prospect Street, New Haven, Connecticut, USA

URL: http://www.nature.com/nclimate/journal/v5/n8/full/nclimate2732.html
Citation statistics:
资源类型: 期刊论文
标识符: http://119.78.100.158/handle/2HF3EXSE/4651
Appears in Collections:气候变化事实与影响
科学计划与规划
气候变化与战略

Files in This Item:
File Name/ File Size Content Type Version Access License
nclimate2732.pdf(346KB)期刊论文作者接受稿开放获取View Download

Recommended Citation:
Justin Farrell. Politics: Echo chambers and false certainty[J]. Nature Climate Change,2015-07-24,Volume:5:Pages:719;720 (2015).
Service
Recommend this item
Sava as my favorate item
Show this item's statistics
Export Endnote File
Google Scholar
Similar articles in Google Scholar
[Justin Farrell]'s Articles
百度学术
Similar articles in Baidu Scholar
[Justin Farrell]'s Articles
CSDL cross search
Similar articles in CSDL Cross Search
[Justin Farrell]‘s Articles
Related Copyright Policies
Null
收藏/分享
文件名: nclimate2732.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF
此文件暂不支持浏览
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

Items in IR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.