globalchange  > 气候变化事实与影响
DOI: doi:10.1038/nclimate2715
论文题名:
Coupling between air travel and climate
作者: Kristopher B. Karnauskas
刊名: Nature Climate Change
ISSN: 1758-837X
EISSN: 1758-6957
出版年: 2015-07-13
卷: Volume:5, 页码:Pages:1068;1073 (2015)
语种: 英语
英文关键词: Atmospheric dynamics ; Climate-change impacts ; Industry ; Projection and prediction
英文摘要:

The airline industry closely monitors the midlatitude jet stream for short-term planning of flight paths and arrival times. In addition to passenger safety and on-time metrics, this is due to the acute sensitivity of airline profits to fuel cost. US carriers spent US$47 billion on jet fuel in 2011, compared with a total industry operating revenue of US$192 billion. Beyond the timescale of synoptic weather, the El Niño/Southern Oscillation (ENSO), Arctic Oscillation (AO) and other modes of variability modulate the strength and position of the Aleutian low and Pacific high on interannual timescales, which influence the tendency of the exit region of the midlatitude Pacific jet stream to extend, retract and meander poleward and equatorward1, 2, 3. The impact of global aviation on climate change has been studied for decades owing to the radiative forcing of emitted greenhouse gases, contrails and other effects4, 5. The impact of climate variability on air travel, however, has only recently come into focus, primarily in terms of turbulence6, 7. Shifting attention to flight durations, here we show that 88% of the interannual variance in domestic flight times between Hawaii and the continental US is explained by a linear combination of ENSO and the AO. Further, we extend our analysis to CMIP5 model projections to explore potential feedbacks between anthropogenic climate change and air travel.

The northeastern subtropical Pacific between Hawaii and the continental US is a major corridor of long-distance commercial air travel. The AirTime statistic (wheels-up to wheels-down) for roughly 250,000 flights between Honolulu (HNL) and Los Angeles (LAX), San Francisco (SFO), and Seattle–Tacoma (SEA) from 1995 to 2013 by four major carriers (United Airlines (UA), American Airlines (AA), Delta Airlines (DL), and Hawaiian Airlines (HA)) are analysed and compared with observed8 daily zonal winds at roughly cruising altitude (300 mb; Fig. 1a). To isolate the signal associated with atmospheric variability (as opposed to systematic changes in traffic, technology or policy), rather than analysing flight times in one direction or the other, the difference between westbound and eastbound flight times (ΔT) of each route is computed. There is substantial seasonal-to-interannual variability (~1 h) in monthly smoothed records of ΔT, which is remarkably consistent across different routes and carriers (Fig. 1b). For example, the ΔT records for the HNL–LAX route exhibit correlations of 0.91 (DL versus HA) to 0.95 (UA versus DL). ΔT records for a given route are also significantly correlated with other routes for the same carrier; the HNL–LAX route is correlated 0.86 with HNL–SFO, and HNL–SFO is correlated 0.65 with HNL–SEA. Moreover, correlations are very high between these three routes and other routes that extend well onto the continent: HNL–LAX is correlated 0.81 with HNL–DEN (Denver), 0.82 with HNL–DFW (Dallas–Fort Worth), 0.75 with HNL–ORD (Chicago OHare), and 0.73 with HNL–ATL (Atlanta).

Figure 1: Overview map and flight-time variability.
Overview map and flight-time variability.

a, Airline routes between HNL and LAX, SFO and SEA International Airports superimposed on the annual mean 300-mb zonal wind field (NCEP/NCAR Reanalysis, 1995–2013). The zonal wind field is contoured every 2.5 m s−1. b, Time series of ΔT for the HNL–SEA, HNL–SFO and HNL–LAX routes. Colours in each panel of b denote carrier (blue for UA, red for AA, green for DL, and cyan for HA). A 31-day running mean was applied to all time series. No HNL–SEA data were available from UA or AA.

  1. Horel, J. D. & Wallace, J. M. Planetary-scale atmospheric phenomena associated with the southern oscillation. Mon. Weath. Rev. 109, 813829 (1981).
  2. Seager, R., Harnik, N., Kushnir, Y., Robinson, W. & Miller, J. Mechanisms of hemispherically symmetric climate variability. J. Clim. 16, 29602978 (2003).
  3. Thompson, D. W. J. & Wallace, J. M. Annular modes in the extratropical circulation. Part I: Month-to-month variability. J. Clim. 13, 10001016 (2000).
  4. Solomon, S. et al. (eds) Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis (IPCC, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2007).
  5. Burkhardt, U. & Karcher, B. Global radiative forcing from contrail cirrus. Nature Clim. Change 1, 5458 (2011).
  6. Williams, P. D. & Joshi, M. M. Intensification of winter transatlantic aviation turbulence in response to climate change. Nature Clim. Change 3, 644648 (2013).
  7. Wolff, J. K. & Sharman, R. D. Climatology of upper-level turbulence over the contiguous United States. J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim. 47, 21982214 (2008).
  8. Kalnay, E. et al. The NCEP/NCAR 40-year reanalysis project. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 77, 437471 (1996).
  9. Jaffe, S. C., Martin, J. E., Vimont, D. J. & Lorenz, D. J. A synoptic climatology of episodic, subseasonal retractions of the Pacific jet. J. Clim. 24, 28462860 (2011).
  10. Taylor, K. E., Stouffer, R. J. & Meehl, G. A. An overview of Cmip5 and the experiment design. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 93, 485498 (2012).
  11. Delcambre, S. C., Lorenz, D. J., Vimont, D. J. & Martin, J. E. Diagnosing northern hemisphere jet portrayal in 17 CMIP3 global climate models: Twenty-first-century projections. J. Clim. 26, 49304946 (2013).
  12. Delcambre, S. C., Lorenz, D. J., Vimont, D. J. & Martin, J. E. Diagnosing northern hemisphere jet portrayal in 17 CMIP3 global climate models: Twentieth-century intermodel variability. J. Clim. 26, 49104929 (2013).
  13. Barnes, E. A. & Polvani, L. Response of the midlatitude jets, and of their variability, to increased greenhouse gases in the CMIP5 models. J. Clim. 26, 71177135 (2013).

Download references

The authors thank B. Carmichael and B. Sharman of the National Center for Atmospheric Research Aviation Applications Program, G. Compo of the Cooperative Institute for Research in the Environmental Sciences, and D. Battisti of the University of Washington Department of Atmospheric Sciences for helpful discussions. We acknowledge the World Climate Research Programmes Working Group on Coupled Modelling, which is responsible for CMIP5, and we thank the climate modelling groups for producing and making available their model output. For CMIP5, the US Department of Energys Program for Climate Model Diagnosis and Intercomparison provides coordinating support and led development of software infrastructure in partnership with the Global Organization for Earth System Science Portals. CMIP5 model output data were acquired from the WHOI CMIP5 Community Storage Server, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, Massachusetts, USA. NCEP/NCAR Reanalysis data were provided by the NOAA/OAR/ESRL PSD, Boulder, Colorado, USA, and acquired from their website at http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/psd. Domestic flight data were acquired from the TranStats website, maintained by the Bureau of Transportation Statistics, Research and Innovative Technology Administration (RITA), US Department of Transportation (http://www.transtats.bts.gov). Airline industry and business statistics were gathered from the MIT Global Airline Industry Program, Airline Data Project (http://web.mit.edu/airlinedata/www/Revenue&Related.html), Air Transport Action Group (http://aviationbenefits.org/media/26786/ATAG__AviationBenefits2014_FULL_LowRes.pdf), and National Air Traffic Controllers Association (NATCA). Emissions coefficients were gathered from the US Energy Information Administration (http://eia.gov/environment/emissions/co2_vol_mass.cfm). K.B.K. acknowledges support from the Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program, the WHOI Oceans and Climate Change Institute, the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, and Microsoft Research.

Affiliations

  1. Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, Massachusetts 02543, USA

    • Kristopher B. Karnauskas &
    • Jeffrey P. Donnelly
  2. Massachusetts Institute of Technology/Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution Joint Program in Oceanography, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA

    • Hannah C. Barkley
  3. University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53715, USA

    • Jonathan E. Martin
URL: http://www.nature.com/nclimate/journal/v5/n12/full/nclimate2715.html
Citation statistics:
资源类型: 期刊论文
标识符: http://119.78.100.158/handle/2HF3EXSE/4665
Appears in Collections:气候变化事实与影响
科学计划与规划
气候变化与战略

Files in This Item: Download All
File Name/ File Size Content Type Version Access License
nclimate2715.pdf(1408KB)期刊论文作者接受稿开放获取View Download

Recommended Citation:
Kristopher B. Karnauskas. Coupling between air travel and climate[J]. Nature Climate Change,2015-07-13,Volume:5:Pages:1068;1073 (2015).
Service
Recommend this item
Sava as my favorate item
Show this item's statistics
Export Endnote File
Google Scholar
Similar articles in Google Scholar
[Kristopher B. Karnauskas]'s Articles
百度学术
Similar articles in Baidu Scholar
[Kristopher B. Karnauskas]'s Articles
CSDL cross search
Similar articles in CSDL Cross Search
[Kristopher B. Karnauskas]‘s Articles
Related Copyright Policies
Null
收藏/分享
文件名: nclimate2715.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF
此文件暂不支持浏览
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

Items in IR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.