globalchange  > 气候变化事实与影响
DOI: doi:10.1038/nclimate2482
论文题名:
Institutional coordination of global ocean observations
作者: Wenju Cai
刊名: Nature Climate Change
ISSN: 1758-1066X
EISSN: 1758-7186
出版年: 2014-12-18
卷: Volume:5, 页码:Pages:4;6 (2015)
语种: 英语
英文关键词: Physical oceanography ; Climate-change impacts ; Marine chemistry ; Scientific community
英文摘要:

A sustainable global ocean observation system requires timely implementation of the framework for ocean observing. The recent Qingdao Global Ocean Summit highlighted the need for a more coherent institutional response to maintain an integrated ocean-observing system.

Approximately 93% of the additional heat associated with global warming is stored in the ocean1, and recent discoveries show that an enhanced heat storage in the subsurface ocean over the past decades contributed to the global surface warming hiatus2, 3, 4, 5. This is just one example that highlights the importance of ocean observations in understanding, monitoring and detecting global climate change, and providing the basis to assess the impacts of climate and environmental change on the ocean.

Ocean observations, the 'bread and butter' of ocean and climate change science, are predominantly conducted by a limited number of large ocean research institutions. At the international level, the World Climate Research Program (WCRP) provides the framework to coordinate climate and ocean science, the Partnership for Observing the Global Ocean (POGO) and the intergovernmental Group on Earth Observations (GEO) offers a venue for discussion and collaboration on ocean observing, and the Global Climate Observing System (GCOS) with its Global Ocean Observing System (GOOS) produces a framework to identify and globally coordinate observations that are critically needed. However, the level of global commitment to sustained ocean observing is falling short of the requirements. This challenge was highlighted at the recently held Global Ocean Summit, on 25–26 October in Qingdao, initiated by newly elected member of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lixin Wu of the Ocean University of China. We call for such a summit to continue.

At the summit, leaders from 61 universities and research institutions, from both developing (22 institutions) and developed (39 institutions) nations, presented their needs and capabilities in ocean science and the required underpinning ocean observations. Their work in the development of new technologies and their ocean observation activities in the open ocean (surface and deep) and below sea ice, both on-going and planned, was highlighted at this summit. Importantly, leading world ocean researchers discussed collaboration methods for inter-institutional scientific and logistic coordination. Such coordination is particularly challenging because of the differences in funding cycles between nations. However, a globally coordinated effort will reap enormous benefits — improved international coordination will help to deliver both a great return on investment and strong science outcomes, and facilitate the emergence of technologies and capabilities for observing deep and unknown parts of the ocean. The international Argo program6 provides an example of the success of such coordination. A collaborative partnership of more than 30 nations, the Argo program has built a global array of more than 3,500 free-drifting profiling floats that measure the upper 2,000 metres of the ocean every 10 days. This program, for the first time, allows continuous monitoring of ocean temperature and salinity on a global scale, with all data relayed and made publicly available within hours after collection. The 10 years of data with over 1,000,000 profiles have been used widely, including studies that examine the distribution and changes in heat and water cycles7, 8, 9.

Such international collaboration is rare though and there is much a regular global ocean summit could do. Firstly, it can be a forum to promote implementation and coordination of the existing framework of ocean observations10. This framework (Fig. 1) was established as a result of the OceanObs'09 conference (http://www.oceanobs09.net), which took place 21–25 September 2009 in Venice, Italy, and brought together more than 600 participants from 36 countries to focus on defining a collective vision of ocean observations for societal benefits. The framework aims to establish an enhanced global ocean-observing system, and to ultimately integrate new physical, biogeochemical and biological observations while sustaining present observations. Informed by scientific and societal issues, the framework builds on our existing observing units, networks and systems, such as satellites, Argo network, ships of opportunity, and a global array of moorings (OceanSites). It also identifies essential ocean variables, such as ocean temperature, salinity and velocity, as the ocean contribution to the climate-observing requirements. These requirements are expressed in GCOS plans (http://www.ioc-goos.org), the implementation of which has been adopted by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (http://unfccc.int/2860.php). Through this United Nations process, buy-ins from nations occur. Data streams, products and new knowledge from independent observing units or networks measuring different essential ocean variables are used to inform climate research and climate-related societal issues — which originally set the requirements — in an important feedback loop that ideally keeps the observing system 'fit for purpose'. However, there is inadequate integration of these observing assets and no timely mechanism for implementing the framework in a manner that addresses fast-emerging scientific and societal drivers requiring a coherent global response, such as understanding the global warming hiatus, sea-level variability, upper ocean heat-content change, or deep ocean warming. The Global Ocean Summit would support global coordination and integration mechanisms.

Figure 1: A global ocean observation framework.
A global ocean observation framework.

Scientific and societal issues determine variables to measure, attracting investment from nations through their research institutions. The outcome of the observations, that is, data, products and new knowledge, inform both existing and new issues, and a feedback loop that keeps the observation system 'fit for purpose'.

Corrected online 07 January 2015
In the Commentary 'Institutional coordination of global ocean observations' (Nature Clim. Change 5, 4-6; 2015) ref. 18 was omitted from the reference list. This has been corrected after print 7 January 2015.
  1. IPCC Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis (eds Stocker, T. F. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013).
  2. Tollefson, J. Nature 505, 276278 (2014).
  3. Kosaka, Y. & Xie, S.-P. Nature 501, 403407 (2013).
  4. Meehl, G. A., Arblaster, J. M., Fasullo, J. T., Hu, A. & Trenberth, K. E. Nature Clim. Change 1, 360364 (2011).
  5. England, M. H. et al. Nature Clim. Change 4, 222227 (2014).
  6. Roemmich, D. & The Argo Steering Team. Oceanography 22, 4655 (2009).
  7. Johnson, G. C. & Lyman, J. M. Nature Clim. Change. 4, 956957 (2014).
  8. Durack, P. J., Gleckler, P. J., Landerer, F. W. & Taylor, K. E. Nature Clim. Change 4, 9991005 (2014).
  9. Durack, P. J., Wijffels, S. E. & Matear, R. J. Science 336, 455458 (2012).
  10. Task Team for an Integrated Framework for Sustained Ocean Observing. A Framework for Ocean Observing (UNESCO 2012); http://dx.doi.org/10.5270/OceanObs09-FOO
  11. Cai, W. et al. Nature Clim. Change 4, 111116 (2014).
  12. Domingues, C. M. et al. Nature 453, 10901094 (2008).
  13. Bianchi, D., Galbraith, E. D., Carozza, D. A., Mislan, K. A. S. & Stock, C. A. Nature Geosci. 6, 545548 (2013).
  14. Barker, S. & Ridgwell, A. Nature Educ. Knowl. 3, 21 (2012).
  15. Orr, J. C. et al. Nature 437, 681686 (2005). URL:
http://www.nature.com/nclimate/journal/v5/n1/full/nclimate2482.html
Citation statistics:
资源类型: 期刊论文
标识符: http://119.78.100.158/handle/2HF3EXSE/4894
Appears in Collections:气候变化事实与影响
科学计划与规划
气候变化与战略

Files in This Item:
File Name/ File Size Content Type Version Access License
nclimate2482.pdf(146KB)期刊论文作者接受稿开放获取View Download

Recommended Citation:
Wenju Cai. Institutional coordination of global ocean observations[J]. Nature Climate Change,2014-12-18,Volume:5:Pages:4;6 (2015).
Service
Recommend this item
Sava as my favorate item
Show this item's statistics
Export Endnote File
Google Scholar
Similar articles in Google Scholar
[Wenju Cai]'s Articles
百度学术
Similar articles in Baidu Scholar
[Wenju Cai]'s Articles
CSDL cross search
Similar articles in CSDL Cross Search
[Wenju Cai]‘s Articles
Related Copyright Policies
Null
收藏/分享
文件名: nclimate2482.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF
此文件暂不支持浏览
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

Items in IR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.