globalchange  > 气候变化事实与影响
DOI: doi:10.1038/nclimate2439
论文题名:
Global disparity in the ecological benefits of reducing carbon emissions for coral reefs
作者: Juan Carlos Ortiz
刊名: Nature Climate Change
ISSN: 1758-1110X
EISSN: 1758-7230
出版年: 2014-11-10
卷: Volume:4, 页码:Pages:1090;1094 (2014)
语种: 英语
英文关键词: Climate-change ecology
英文摘要:

Even if carbon emissions are reduced drastically in the next decade the amount of carbon already stored in the atmosphere would lead to the occurrence of extreme thermal events every three to four years between 2040 and 20801, 2. This time lag on the effect of reducing emissions suggests that the benefits of carbon emission reduction on the health of coral reefs will be noticeable only in the long term2, 3, 4. Here, we use a spatially explicit ecosystem model to compare the potential ecosystem benefits that Caribbean and Pacific reefs could gain from reductions in carbon emissions, and the timescale of these benefits. We found that whereas the effect of a reduction in emissions on Caribbean reefs will be modest and realized only in the long term (more than 60 years), Pacific reefs would start to show benefits within the first half of this century. Moreover, it seems that Pacific reefs have the potential to maintain their ecological integrity and ecosystem state in the mid- to long term if carbon emissions are reduced, but only if plate-like corals are present.

Since the early 1990s climate change has been identified as one of the main threats to coral reefs1. It has been shown repeatedly that the frequency and intensity of extreme thermal events will increase nonlinearly over the next 100 years2, 5. Owing to the large pool of greenhouse gas (GHG) already stored in the atmosphere from decades of emissions, and lags in the ability of Earth systems to reabsorb these excesses, legacy impacts will be felt for years even if emissions are reduced drastically in the near future5, 6. Even under climate scenarios that require strong and immediate emission reductions (reducing emissions to 1980s level by 2020, Representative Concentration Pathway (RCP) 2.6), there will still be extreme thermal events every three to four years between 2040 and 2080; only towards the end of the century will the frequency of these events start to decline2, 5, 6. Therefore, it is not clear how long it will take for the reduction in thermal stress to translate into an improvement in ecosystem state. Furthermore, the potential for synergistic effects and ecological feedbacks from the multiple stressors impacting reefs—such as overfishing, hurricanes, reduced calcification, and sedimentation—increase the risk of coral reefs losing resilience by the time the potential benefits of reducing GHG emissions are realized7.

Most of the projections of the effect of thermal stress on coral reefs are based on the frequency and intensity of predicted future thermal disturbances1, 8, but relatively few studies have attempted to predict the ecosystem-level consequences in detail9, 10, 11, 12. In particular, spatially explicit models that incorporate multiple coral taxa and their vital rates, as well as multiple ecological mechanisms (for example, herbivory and productivity), have mainly been applied to reefs in the Caribbean3, 4, 13. These studies support the idea that reducing emissions will have only a small positive effect in the state of Caribbean reefs in the short to mid-term, with a predicted coral cover of less than 10% for most Caribbean reefs, and with coral cover trajectories that do not start to trend up by the end of the twenty-first century. However, available evidence, in terms of observed recovery rates14, suggest that Pacific reefs have far greater resilience than those in the Caribbean. Thus, it is possible that Pacific reefs may respond earlier and more strongly to a change in climate policy.

Here, we present a spatially explicit ecosystem model for Pacific coral reefs and examine their response to alternate climate scenarios. We also compare the behaviour of Pacific reefs against those of the Caribbean, using a similar model from that region. The model includes six representative coral growth forms of the Pacific, each with different life history traits (Fig. 1). Model parameterization combines 40 published articles and new empirical data in addition to the 26 publications used in the parameterization of the Caribbean model. Full descriptions of parameters and model sensitivity analysis are provided in Supplementary Methods and Supplementary Analysis, respectively. Model performance was validated by reproducing 18 observed recovery trajectories from 14 reefs, spanning more than 1,200 km along the Great Barrier Reef (GBR; Fig. 2a).

Figure 1: Life history parameters of Pacific coral ‘species’.
Life history parameters of Pacific coral /`species/'.

Colours represent relative values of each parameter (1 = the highest value of a particular parameter among the six coral types). Absolute values are provided in the Supplementary Methods.

The simulation model employed in the present study was designed to represent mid-depth (6–15 m) Orbicella-dominated forereefs in the Caribbean, which are the predominant coral-rich habitat in the region29 and 6–12 m forereefs in the Pacific. Because white-band disease has depleted populations of large, branching corals30 in the Caribbean, stylized massive growth forms of coral were simulated together for the forereefs. Six different growth forms were included in the Pacific model, with rates of recruitment, growth, reproduction and mortality. The model is a square lattice of 2,500 cells, each of which approximates 1 m2 of reef, and can be occupied by a mixture of living and dead substrata. Although the reef has a toroidal lattice of 2,500 cells, the lattice structure merely helps define probabilistic rules of coral recruitment and vegetative algal growth. Individual cells comprise multiple coral colonies and algal patches, so interactions occur at colony scales as they do in situ. The reef has continuous boundaries, arranged as a torus. Corals can recruit to individual patches of cropped algae, but not macroalgae. Macroalgae grow vegetatively and can overgrow corals. Grazing affects all algal classes and always results in the first grazed algal class (cropped algae). Competitive interactions between corals and macroalgae reduce the growth rate of each taxon and are the only processes modelled to occur across cell boundaries. The arrangement of elements within an individual cell has no explicit spatial structure, but coral–coral competition can occur at intra-cellular scales. Corals are subjected to size-dependent fecundity and mortality, resulting in three functional categories: recruits (horizontal cross-sectional area 1–60 cm2), juveniles (61–250 cm2), and adults (>250 cm2). All simulations assume no stock-recruitment relationship and corals recruit at maximum levels irrespective of stock size (that is, up to 12 recruits per m−2 yr−1). Individual cells in the lattice are updated in random sequence using discrete intervals of six months. The parameterization was based on reefs with little sediment deposition; therefore no effect of sediment on recruitment is incorporated. All parameters were fitted from empirical studies.

Fifty simulations were run for each scenario for a duration of 180 time steps (90 years), as this is the length of the available climate projections3. These projections extend to the year 2100.

Thermal stress.

Thermal stress is implemented in the model as bleaching events following a previous application of the Caribbean model3. Bleaching events are triggered when the summer modelled sea surface temperature generates more than 4 degree heating weeks (DHW) in a summer season. When a bleaching event is triggered there is partial and total colony mortality associated with it. Mortality rates are species specific, size specific, and consider whether a colony has experienced previous bleaching or not. Total mortality due to bleaching is calculated as a function of the intensity and duration of the thermal stress using empirical relationships3.

Climate scenarios.

Background scenarios were considered where only natural partial and total mortality affected the reefs. These scenarios were included to compare disturbance-free recovery trajectories between the two provinces. Two climate change scenarios were considered for the calculation of partial and total coral mortality owing to bleaching events3. The low GHG emissions scenario (RCP2.6) represents the future trajectory of sea surface temperature anomalies considering an immediate drastic reduction in greenhouse gas emissions. This scenario implies a peaking of about 450 ppm CO2 equivalent (CO2e) by 2040 and 380 ppm CO2e by 2100. The business-as-usual emissions scenario (RCP8.5) represents a high emissions situation where emissions continue to grow and little action is taken to reduce emissions in the near future. In this scenario, CO2 concentrations increase linearly, reaching 1,200 ppm CO2e by 2100. All climate variables were provided as a spatial mean across the Caribbean Sea for the Caribbean model, and the GBR for the Pacific model.

Coral species.

Because white-band disease has depleted populations of large, branching corals in the Caribbean30, four coral types (representing different growth forms) were simulated for the forereefs. Six coral types (representing different growth forms) were included in the Pacific model, with specific rates of recruitment, growth, reproduction and mortality for each coral type in both regions (see Supplementary Methods for details).

Model validation.

The yearly average recovery rate of 18 trajectories from 14 reefs included in the Australian Institute of Marine Science Long-Term Monitoring Program (Permanent transects in 98 reefs along the Great Barrier Reef between 1992 and 2012) were compared against simulated recovery rates using the same initial conditions observed in the 18 field observations. (The 18 observations included every time series of at least four consecutive years without a reduction in coral cover (average length six years) from the whole data set.) A linear mixed model was used to statistically compare the average recovery rate between field and modelled trajectories. Bray–Curtis similarity was used to compare the final community structure of field and modelled data. The detailed parameterization and sensitivity of the model are presented in Supplementary Methods and Supplementary Analysis, respectively.

  1. Hoegh-Guldberg, O. et al. Coral reefs under rapid climate change and ocean acidification. Science 318, 17371742 (2007).
  2. Donner, S. D., Skirving, W. J., Little, C. M., Oppenheimer, M. & Hoegh-Guldberg, O. Global assessment of coral bleaching and required rates of adaptation under climate change. Glob. Change Biol. 11, 22512265 (2005).
  3. Edwards, H. J. et al. How much time can herbivore protection buy for coral reefs under realistic regimes of hurricanes and coral bleaching? Glob. Change Biol. 17, 20332048 (2011).
  4. Ortiz, J., González-Rivero, M. & Mumby, P. An ecosystem-level perspective on the host and symbiont traits needed to mitigate climate change impacts on Caribbean coral reefs. Ecosystems 17, 113 (2013).
  5. Frieler, K. et al. Limiting global warming to 2 °C is unlikely to save most coral reefs. Nature Clim. Change 3, 165170 (2012).
  6. Matthews, H. D. & Caldeira, K. Stabilizing climate requires near-zero emissions. Geophys. Res. Lett. 35, L04705 (2008).
  7. Bozec, Y-M. & Mumby, P. J. Synergistic impacts of global warming on the resilience of coral reefs. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B (in the press).
  8. Graham, N. A. J., Cinner, J. E., Norström, A. V. & Nyström, M. Coral reefs as novel ecosystems: Embracing new futures. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 7, 914 (2014).
  9. Kreyling, J., Jentsch, A. &
URL: http://www.nature.com/nclimate/journal/v4/n12/full/nclimate2439.html
Citation statistics:
资源类型: 期刊论文
标识符: http://119.78.100.158/handle/2HF3EXSE/4938
Appears in Collections:气候变化事实与影响
科学计划与规划
气候变化与战略

Files in This Item:
File Name/ File Size Content Type Version Access License
nclimate2439.pdf(939KB)期刊论文作者接受稿开放获取View Download

Recommended Citation:
Juan Carlos Ortiz. Global disparity in the ecological benefits of reducing carbon emissions for coral reefs[J]. Nature Climate Change,2014-11-10,Volume:4:Pages:1090;1094 (2014).
Service
Recommend this item
Sava as my favorate item
Show this item's statistics
Export Endnote File
Google Scholar
Similar articles in Google Scholar
[Juan Carlos Ortiz]'s Articles
百度学术
Similar articles in Baidu Scholar
[Juan Carlos Ortiz]'s Articles
CSDL cross search
Similar articles in CSDL Cross Search
[Juan Carlos Ortiz]‘s Articles
Related Copyright Policies
Null
收藏/分享
文件名: nclimate2439.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF
此文件暂不支持浏览
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

Items in IR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.