globalchange  > 气候变化事实与影响
DOI: doi:10.1038/nclimate2414
论文题名:
Household electricity access a trivial contributor to CO2 emissions growth in India
作者: Shonali Pachauri
刊名: Nature Climate Change
ISSN: 1758-1137X
EISSN: 1758-7257
出版年: 2014-10-19
卷: Volume:4, 页码:Pages:1073;1076 (2014)
语种: 英语
英文关键词: Climate-change policy ; Environmental economics ; Developing world
英文摘要:

Impetus to expand electricity access in developing nations is urgent1. Yet aspirations to provide universal access to electricity are often considered potentially conflicting with efforts to mitigate climate change2. How much newly electrified, largely poor, households raise emissions, however, remains uncertain. Results from a first retrospective analysis show that improvements in household electricity access contributed 3–4% of national emissions growth in India over the past three decades. Emissions from both the direct and indirect electricity use of more than 650 million people connected since 1981 accounted for 11–25% of Indian emissions growth or, on average, a rise of 0.008–0.018 tons of CO2 per person per year between 1981 and 2011. Although this is a marginal share of global emissions, it does not detract from the importance for developing countries to start reducing the carbon intensities of their electricity generation to ensure sustainable development and avoid future carbon lock-in3, 4. Significant ancillary benefits for air quality, health, energy security and efficiency may also make this attractive for reasons other than climate mitigation alone5, 6.

Access to electricity services is fundamental to development, as it enables improvements in human quality of life. Recent empirical studies have quantified a range of benefits of better electricity access and reliability for income and employment generation, gender equity, health, entrepreneurship and education7, 8, 9. People without electricity are denied the most basic services, from street lighting that can improve safety at night, to mobile phone charging that is vital for communication. Tasks such as milling and grinding cereals that ordinarily require the push of a button can, for the unelectrified, take days of human labour and drudgery, trapping them in subsistence living.

Despite general recognition of the critical importance of electricity, India today hosts the world’s largest population without access to it. According to the 2011 Census, a third of all households in the country, or almost 400 million people, live without this basic service10. More than 90% of the unelectrified live in rural areas, and for many that are connected electricity supply remains highly unreliable9. Providing universal and reliable access to affordable electricity is essential. Yet significant barriers exist to electrifying rural areas in most developing nations, including India11, 12. Overcoming these barriers requires strengthening policy and institutional frameworks and additional investments13.

Providing a minimum amount of basic electricity access universally is an urgent short-term imperative. However, ultimately the objective is to extend the benefits of electricity services so as to sustain escape from poverty, and provide more equitable opportunities for livelihood creation and long-term economic development. Providing energy that enables this broader development, beyond meeting just basic household needs, could lead to larger increases in energy demand14. Finding sustainable pathways to meet this growing demand remains a pressing challenge for much of the developing world.

Nations facing the biggest challenge in providing modern energy access have historically contributed the least to climate change15. However, this is unlikely to continue as, in many emerging nations, large populations without access to modern energy services already coexist with populations living affluent lifestyles and having large carbon footprints. This has given rise to growing concern about the emissions implications of better access to modern energy in the developing world. Understanding the contribution to historical emissions growth of changes in electricity access can provide insights for avoiding any potential future trade-offs between universal electrification and climate change mitigation goals.

Existing evidence suggests that meeting the energy needs of the poor is unlikely to contribute significantly to global greenhouse gas emissions16, 17. Recent studies that have assessed the emissions implications of eradicating energy poverty globally or achieving universal modern energy access for cooking and electricity use in homes have done so prospectively. They conclude that these efforts would contribute only marginally to greenhouse gas emissions over the next decades.

This work, for the first time, analyses the emissions implications of better access retrospectively, using historical data from India. India is an ideal case for such an analysis because of its large unelectrified population, the scale of electrification it has already achieved, and its growing energy demand and emissions. In 2011, India emitted 1,745 MtCO2 yr−1 according to the International Energy Agency (IEA; ref. 18). The electricity sector’s contribution to total national CO2 emissions rose from less than 30% in 1981 to more than 45% by 2011, increasing more than tenfold to 795 MtCO2 yr−1 in 2011. Over the past three decades, household electricity use has also contributed a growing share of total national CO2 emissions, accounting for 20% of electricity sector emissions in 2011. Between 1981 and 2011, household electricity access improved from 26% to 67% according to census sources10, or from 25% to 74% according to national surveys19. According to data for the same period from India’s Central Electricity Authority (CEA), the share of households connected increased from 19% to 71% (ref. 20). In other words, more than 650 million Indians gained access to electricity over these thirty years. Two-thirds of all households that were connected to electricity during this period were rural. Average annual electricity use among those connected remains very low, despite more than doubling from about 400 kWh per household in 1981 to more than 900 kWh per household in 2011 (Fig. 1). By comparison in 2011, the average household consumption of electricity in China was about 1,200 kWh, whereas in the USA it was more than 10,000 kWh.

Figure 1: Estimates of rural, urban and national household access rates, and average direct household electricity use per connected household between 1981 and 2011 from the Central Electricity Authority (CEA) and National Sample Survey (NSS) data sets.
Estimates of rural, urban and national household access rates, and average direct household electricity use per connected household between 1981 and 2011 from the Central Electricity Authority (CEA) and National Sample Survey (NSS) data sets.

Two national sources of data on electricity access and use are employed in this study (see Supplementary Text for more details on the sources used and indicators constructed and see Supplementary Table 1 for the data sets). Annual data on household and national electricity sales (consumption) and number of household connections are sourced from the annual statistical reports of the CEA for the period 1981–201120. In addition, bottom-up estimates of household electricity access, use, population and household size are derived from the large sample quinquennial rounds of the nationally representative Household Consumer Expenditure Surveys (HCES) conducted by the National Sample Survey Organisation (NSSO; ref. 19). This is, in fact, the only source of data from which it is possible to derive estimates of electricity access and consumption separated by rural and urban residence and for different population subgroups over time. The large quinquennial rounds cover the years 1983, 1987–88, 1993–94, 1999–00, 2004–05 and 2009–10. Aggregated data on electricity sales to domestic or household consumers from the CEA reports and bottom-up estimate of total household electricity consumption from the NSSO household surveys are consistent (see Supplementary Fig. 2 for a comparison of estimates from the two data sources). There are, however, some differences between the data sources on estimates of the share of households with access or connection, and the average electricity use per connected household (see Fig. 1 and Supplementary Fig. 1). Furthermore, data on the total number of households are taken from the Indian censuses10. Finally, annual estimates of national and sectoral CO2 emissions from electricity production, and the amount of total electricity production, that are used to estimate the carbon intensity of electricity production are sourced from the International Energy Agency18. Other greenhouse gases, biospheric CO2, and aerosols are not included in this analysis as they correlate less with personal electricity consumption and use.

For the decomposition analysis the additive logarithmic mean Divisia index (LMDI) is employed, which is considered a preferred method30. Changes in total emissions from electricity use are decomposed into four underlying factors.

where

E = CO2 emissions from electricity use;

I = E/P, carbon intensity of electricity production P

C = U/HHA, the average use of electricity (U) per household with access (HHA)

A = HHA/HHN, the share of households with access (HHA) to the total number of households (HHN)

N = HHN, total number of households

The decomposition of the change in CO2 emissions from electricity use from time period 0 to period T into the contribution from the change in the four different factors is then done as follows:

where

where L is the logarithmic mean given by

Results from the decomposition analysis are used to calculate how much of the increase in emissions from direct household electricity use between 1981 and 2011 was attributable to changes in each of the four factors, including improvements in household electricity access. The calculated change in amount of emissions is then divided by the total rise in national emissions in India between 1981 and 2011 to estimate the percentage contribution to the change in total national emissions during this period.

The attribution of emissions due to improvements in household electricity access can also be estimated using other methods. This is a first attempt to do so for India using the LMDI method. Better data availability in the future should allow the application of alternative methods and to other national contexts as well.

  1. Secretary-General UN A Vision Statement by Ban Ki-moon Secretary-General of the United Nations — Sustainable Energy for all (United Nations, 2011).
  2. Moss, T., Roger Pielke, J. & Bazilian, M. Balancing Energy Access and Environmental Goals in Development Finance: The Case of the OPIC Carbon Cap (Center for Global Development, 2014).
  3. Rogelj, J. et al. Halfway to Copenhagen, no way to 2 °C. Nature Clim. Change 3, 8183 (2009).
  4. Bertram, C. et al. Carbon lock-in through capital stock inertia associated with weak near-term climate policies. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.10.001 (2013).
  5. Wilkinson, P. et al. Public health benefits of strategies to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions: Household energy. Lancet 374, 19171929 (2009).
  6. IPCC in Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change (eds Edenhofer, O. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2014).
  7. Khandker, S. R., Samad, H. A., Ali, R. & Barnes, D. F. Who benefits most from rural electrification? Evidence in India. Energy J. 35, 7596 (2014).
  8. Dinkelman, T. The effects of rural electrification on employment: New evidence from South Africa. Am. Econ. Rev. 101, 30783108 (2011).
  9. Rao, N. D. Does (better) electricity supply increase household enterprise income in India? Energy Policy 57, 532541 (2013).
  10. Registrar General of India Data on Housing, Table H Series (Census of India, 2011).
  11. Barnes, D. F. The Challenge of Rural Electrification: Strategies for Developing Countries (RFF Press, 2007).
  12. Bhattacharyya, S. C. Energy access programmes and sustainable development: A critical review and analysis. Energy Sustain. Dev. 16, 260271 (2012).
  13. GEA Global Energy Assessment — Toward a Sustainable Future (Cambridge Univ. Press and the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, 2012).
  14. Nilsson, M. et al. Energy for a Shared Development Agenda: Global Scenarios and Governance Implications (Stockholm Environment Institute, 2012).
  15. Matthews, H. D. et al. National contributions to observed global warming. Environ. Res. Lett. 9, 014010 (2014).
  16. Chakravarty, S. & Tavoni, M. Energy poverty alleviation and climate change mitigation: Is there a trade off? Energy Econ. 40, S67S73 (2013).
  17. Pachauri, S.
URL: http://www.nature.com/nclimate/journal/v4/n12/full/nclimate2414.html
Citation statistics:
资源类型: 期刊论文
标识符: http://119.78.100.158/handle/2HF3EXSE/4963
Appears in Collections:气候变化事实与影响
科学计划与规划
气候变化与战略

Files in This Item:
File Name/ File Size Content Type Version Access License
nclimate2414.pdf(480KB)期刊论文作者接受稿开放获取View Download

Recommended Citation:
Shonali Pachauri. Household electricity access a trivial contributor to CO2 emissions growth in India[J]. Nature Climate Change,2014-10-19,Volume:4:Pages:1073;1076 (2014).
Service
Recommend this item
Sava as my favorate item
Show this item's statistics
Export Endnote File
Google Scholar
Similar articles in Google Scholar
[Shonali Pachauri]'s Articles
百度学术
Similar articles in Baidu Scholar
[Shonali Pachauri]'s Articles
CSDL cross search
Similar articles in CSDL Cross Search
[Shonali Pachauri]‘s Articles
Related Copyright Policies
Null
收藏/分享
文件名: nclimate2414.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF
此文件暂不支持浏览
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

Items in IR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.