globalchange  > 气候变化事实与影响
DOI: doi:10.1038/nclimate2312
论文题名:
Science integration into US climate and ocean policy
作者: Laura E. Petes
刊名: Nature Climate Change
ISSN: 1758-1229X
EISSN: 1758-7349
出版年: 2014-07-30
卷: Volume:4, 页码:Pages:671;677 (2014)
语种: 英语
英文关键词: Policy ; Climate-change ecology ; Marine biology
英文摘要:

The pace of environmental change lends urgency to the need for integration of climate considerations into ocean policy and management. A recent rapid expansion of ocean and climate policies provides a timely window of opportunity for the scientific community to inform and support these efforts. Lessons can be learned from successful initiatives, where scientists are working hand-in-hand with decision makers and managers to enhance ocean resilience. Looking ahead, the most pressing decision-needs associated with oceans and climate change should serve to prioritize and drive scientific efforts.

We live on a blue planet. The oceans cover 71% of Earth's surface and contain 97% of the planet's water. Oceans provide many critical services on which people depend, including jobs in fishing and tourism, places for recreation and enjoyment, opportunities for commerce and transportation, global climate regulation, and carbon sequestration1. Globally, seafood provides nearly two billion people with almost 20% of their intake of animal protein2. Oceans are inherently linked to economic productivity and to the vibrancy of coastal communities. The ocean and coastal economy contributed 2.8 million jobs and over $282 billion to the US gross domestic product in 20113. In the United States, coastal watershed counties make up only 18% of the nation's land area, but are home to more than 50% of US citizens4.

However, oceans are threatened by the impacts of climate change and acidification, which have already affected ocean health5, 6. These changes are compromising the ability of oceans to provide valuable ecosystem services, with ecological and socio-economic consequences7. Now and in the coming decades, the impacts of climate change on global oceans will lead to numerous challenges for sectors such as natural resource management, energy production, human health, transportation and national security8, 9, 10. These changes could drastically impact ocean services, as well as the societies that depend on them.

Science is playing an increasingly important role in informing policy and management of the world's oceans. The realization that oceans are rapidly changing11, 12 has prompted calls for better international collaboration, integration across scientific disciplines and strengthened partnerships across ocean science, management and policy communities. Nevertheless, despite increasing political interest in the expanding body of knowledge on the impacts of climate change and ocean acidification, scientific understanding is often not reflected in policy and management decisions, and misperceptions among both scientists and decision makers impede the two-way exchange of information. In many instances, decision makers and managers lack access to scientific information that meets their specific needs, or they may expect information with higher certainty or resolution (for example, local-scale projections of climate and sea-level rise) than is feasible or necessary for addressing their planning needs. Conversely, scientists often view the pathway from basic research to enactment of policy as opaque and frustrating, and academic researchers, in particular, frequently are not encouraged, and do not always understand if and how, to engage in the policy dialogue. There is often a misperception that details and caveats inherent in scientific studies and models render such information useless in the policy-making process, a factor that, ironically, may have resulted from the lack of effective dialogue between scientists and decision makers in the first place. Such disconnects can hamstring efforts to develop and implement climate adaptation policies and practices based on best-available science.

Ocean management needs to become more climate-smart; in other words, it needs to reflect and integrate current and projected impacts of climate change. This depends on multiple forms of scientific information that are spatially and temporally relevant and easily accessible, consistent methodologies that allow for cross-study comparisons, policies that reflect scientific understanding and are sufficiently flexible to accommodate uncertainty, and meaningful engagement across multiple sectors of society.

The need for improved partnerships between scientists and society has been raised numerous times in recent decades13, 14. Innovative partnerships have been put into place to address this need and to enhance coordination and inform decision making. As a result, policies and practices are beginning to more accurately reflect scientific understanding. This provides an unprecedented chance for action, as the scientific understanding of climate impacts on oceans has improved, policies that depend on best-available science are being developed and early efforts to integrate climate information into ocean management provide transferable lessons learned.

Here, we discuss emerging US science and policy initiatives associated with enhancing ocean resilience to climate change. In addition, we describe several examples where climate information has successfully been incorporated into ocean policy and planning efforts. Finally, we articulate opportunities for advancing partnerships between scientists, policy makers and society to address ocean and climate issues.

In the United States, an increasing spotlight on the importance of marine resources and ocean ecosystem services has led to a number of recent national-level initiatives with relevance to climate-related ocean change. Examples include the National Fish, Wildlife, and Plants Climate Adaptation Strategy, the Interagency Working Group on Ocean Acidification, the Interagency Climate Change Adaptation Task Force, the National Ocean Policy and the President's Climate Action Plan (Table 1). In addition, existing US federal laws, such as the Clean Water Act, the Endangered Species Act, the Federal Ocean Acidification Research and Monitoring Act, and the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act, are being applied to manage the impacts of climate change and acidification on ocean waters15. New climate-smart policies and practices that reflect the need for sustainable ocean management in a changing climate are being developed and implemented. Collectively, these initiatives provide a framework for planning and action, with the goal of enhancing climate resilience.

Table 1: Emerging landscape of national and federal US climate adaptation and ocean science policy initiatives (modified from ref. 15).

Large strides have been made in recent years in aligning scientific understanding of climate impacts on oceans with national-scale policies in the United States (Table 1). However, despite progress to date, many challenges to successful coastal and ocean climate adaptation actions still exist17. Some of these barriers are due to lack of access to usable, policy-relevant information; others are associated with institutional and capacity challenges to implementation, including lack of financial resources, stakeholder awareness, support and engagement17, 32. As climate and ocean scientific knowledge grows globally, it will become increasingly overwhelming for ocean resource managers and decision makers to stay abreast of new studies as they emerge and even more difficult to determine what information is the most relevant. Additionally, once usable scientific information is identified, it must be weighed with other decision factors — such as public values, financial considerations, stakeholder needs and feasibility of potential actions33.

These challenges, opportunities and lessons learned are not unique to the United States. Each of the case studies described here has a globally relevant counterpart. In terms of climate assessments, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's fifth assessment report is the most comprehensive international effort to date, and the Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability Working Group developed a standalone chapter on ocean systems34. The third NCA and the fifth Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change assessment report were released within months of each other, providing reinforced knowledge to inform domestic and global decisions. For drought early warning, the North American Drought Monitor has been developed over the past decade to enhance collaboration on, and planning for, drought between the United States, Canada and Mexico35. This international effort leverages the US model of information exchange and engagement with decision makers. Opportunities also exist to learn from other countries that have integrated climate information into long-term planning and MPA design and management (Box 3). International collaboration on ocean conservation and management will become increasingly important over coming decades, as impacts such as ice melt and shifts in the distribution and abundance of highly migratory and threatened and endangered species occur.

Box 3: Managing for climate change in the Verde Island Passage (VIP), Philippines.

© Lynn Tang, Conservation International

Conservation International staff, local partners and community members plant mangroves in Silonay, Verde Island Passage, Philippines.

  1. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Synthesis (Island Press, 2005).
  2. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations The State of the World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2012 (FAO, 2013).
  3. Economics: National Ocean Watch (ENOW) Explorer (NOAA Coastal Services Center, 2014); http://www.csc.noaa.gov/enow/explorer/
  4. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Coastal Population Report: Trends from 1970 to 2020 (NOAA, 2013); http://www.stateofthecoast.noaa.gov
  5. Doney, S. C. et al. Climate change impacts on marine ecosystems. Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci. 4, 1137 (2012).
  6. Halpern, B. S. et al. An index to assess the health and benefits of the global ocean. Nature 488, 615620 (2012).
  7. Ruckelshaus, M. et al. Securing ocean benefits for society in the face of climate change. Mar. Policy 40, 154159 (2013).
  8. Borgerson, S. G. Arctic meltdown: the economic and security implications of global warming. Foreign Aff. 87, 6377 (2008).
  9. Campbell, K. M. et al. The Age of Consequences: The Foreign Policy and National Security Implications of Global Climate Change (Center for Strategic and International Studies and Center for a New American Security, 2007).
  10. Lackenbauer, P. W. (ed.) Canadian Arctic Sovereignty and Security: Historical Perspectives (Calgary Papers in Military and Strategic Studies, Centre for Military and Strategic Studies and Univ. Calgary Press, 2011).
  11. Hoegh-Guldberg, O. & Bruno, J. F. The impact of climate change on the world's marine ecosystems. Science 328, 15231528 (2010).
  12. Burrows, M. T. et al. The pace of shifting climate in marine and terrestrial ecosystems. Science 334, 652655 (2011).
  13. Lubchenco, J. Entering the century of the environment: a new social contract for science. Science 279, 491497 (1998).
  14. Dilling, L. & Lemos, M. C. Creating usable science: opportunities and constraints for climate knowledge and their implications for science policy. Glob. Environ. Change 21, 680689 (2010).
  15. Howard, J. et al. in Oceanography and Marine Biology: An Annual Review Vol. 51 (Hughes, R. N., Hughes, D. J. & Smith, I. P.) 71192 (CRC Press, 2013).
  16. Glick, P., Stein, B. & Edelson, N. A. Scanning the Conservation Horizon: A Guide to Climate Change Vulnerability Assessment (National Wildlife Federation, 2011).
  17. Gregg, R. M. et al. The State of Marine and Coastal Adaptation in North America: A Synthesis of Emerging Ideas (EcoAdapt, 2011).
  18. Melillo, J. M., Richmond, T. C. & Yohe, G. W. Climate Change Impacts in the United States: The Third National Climate Assessment (US Global Change Research Program, 2014).
  19. Gilbert, S., Lackstrom, K. & Tufford, D. L. The Impact of Drought on Coastal Ecosystems in the Carolinas: State of Knowledge Report (Research Report 2012–01, Carolinas Integrated Sciences and Assessments, 2012).
  20. Silliman, B. R., van de Koppel, J., Bertness, M. D., Stanton, L. E. & Mendelssohn, I. A. Dr
URL: http://www.nature.com/nclimate/journal/v4/n8/full/nclimate2312.html
Citation statistics:
资源类型: 期刊论文
标识符: http://119.78.100.158/handle/2HF3EXSE/5053
Appears in Collections:气候变化事实与影响
科学计划与规划
气候变化与战略

Files in This Item: Download All
File Name/ File Size Content Type Version Access License
nclimate2312.pdf(589KB)期刊论文作者接受稿开放获取View Download

Recommended Citation:
Laura E. Petes. Science integration into US climate and ocean policy[J]. Nature Climate Change,2014-07-30,Volume:4:Pages:671;677 (2014).
Service
Recommend this item
Sava as my favorate item
Show this item's statistics
Export Endnote File
Google Scholar
Similar articles in Google Scholar
[Laura E. Petes]'s Articles
百度学术
Similar articles in Baidu Scholar
[Laura E. Petes]'s Articles
CSDL cross search
Similar articles in CSDL Cross Search
[Laura E. Petes]‘s Articles
Related Copyright Policies
Null
收藏/分享
文件名: nclimate2312.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF
此文件暂不支持浏览
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

Items in IR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.