globalchange  > 气候变化事实与影响
DOI: doi:10.1038/nclimate2271
论文题名:
Amplified mid-latitude planetary waves favour particular regional weather extremes
作者: James A. Screen
刊名: Nature Climate Change
ISSN: 1758-1267X
EISSN: 1758-7387
出版年: 2014-06-22
卷: Volume:4, 页码:Pages:704;709 (2014)
语种: 英语
英文关键词: Climate change ; Atmospheric science ; Atmospheric dynamics
英文摘要:

There has been an ostensibly large number of extreme weather events in the Northern Hemisphere mid-latitudes during the past decade1. An open question that is critically important for scientists and policy makers is whether any such increase in weather extremes is natural or anthropogenic in origin2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13. One mechanism proposed to explain the increased frequency of extreme weather events is the amplification of mid-latitude atmospheric planetary waves14, 15, 16, 17. Disproportionately large warming in the northern polar regions compared with mid-latitudes—and associated weakening of the north–south temperature gradient—may favour larger amplitude planetary waves14, 15, 16, 17, although observational evidence for this remains inconclusive18, 19, 20, 21. A better understanding of the role of planetary waves in causing mid-latitude weather extremes is essential for assessing the potential environmental and socio-economic impacts of future planetary wave changes. Here we show that months of extreme weather over mid-latitudes are commonly accompanied by significantly amplified quasi-stationary mid-tropospheric planetary waves. Conversely, months of near-average weather over mid-latitudes are often accompanied by significantly attenuated waves. Depending on geographical region, certain types of extreme weather (for example, hot, cold, wet, dry) are more strongly related to wave amplitude changes than others. The findings suggest that amplification of quasi-stationary waves preferentially increases the probabilities of heat waves in western North America and central Asia, cold outbreaks in eastern North America, droughts in central North America, Europe and central Asia, and wet spells in western Asia.

A series of weather extremes have hit the Northern Hemisphere mid-latitudes in recent years1, such as the European heat wave in summer 20038, cold and snowy winters in 2009/10, 2010/11 and 2013/14 in the northeast United States6, 16, 21, the Russian heat wave in summer 20102, 3, 4, 5, the Texas drought of 20116, and the summer 2012 and winter 2013/14 floods in the United Kingdom7, 10; all have had significant socio-economic impacts. There is increasing scientific evidence1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and a growing public perception22 that extreme weather events are occurring more frequently. However, the mechanisms that drive weather extremes and through which climate change may influence climate variability are poorly understood. A potential cause of increased weather extremes is the amplification of atmospheric planetary waves14, 15, 16, 17. It has been proposed that the weakening north–south temperature gradient—a key characteristic of anthropogenic climate change23, 24—may cause larger amplitude planetary waves14, 15, 16, 17, although the observational evidence for this and the dynamical mechanism have been questioned18, 19, 20, 21. It is further proposed that high-amplitude planetary waves favour the occurrence of extreme weather14, 15, 16, 17. It is this hypothesis that we examine here (and not wave amplitude trends).

First, it is necessary to define precisely ‘extreme weather’ for this application. We are concerned with persistent anomalies in land surface temperature (TL) and land precipitation (PL), such as heat waves, cold spells, droughts and prolonged wet periods, which are evident on monthly timescales and large spatial scales (Methods). Initially we focus on absolute (that is, irrespective of their sign) TL and PL anomalies (denoted |TL′| and |PL′|). This is appropriate because planetary waves tend to induce positive temperature (and perhaps precipitation) anomalies at some longitudes and negative anomalies at other longitudes. Figure 1a, b shows normalized time series for monthly |TL′| and |PL′|, respectively, area-averaged over northern mid-latitudes (35°–60° N; area shown in Fig. 2). The 40 months with largest values (approx. 10% of cases) are highlighted by circles and labelled on the lower x axis, and are hereafter referred to as months of extreme temperature/precipitation. The months of extreme temperature and the months of extreme precipitation lie relatively evenly through the 34-year period, and there is no long-term trend. A full discussion of 34-year trends is provided in Supplementary Discussion 1.

Figure 1: Planetary-wave amplitude anomalies during months of extreme weather.
Planetary-wave amplitude anomalies during months of extreme weather.

a,b, Normalized monthly time series of mid-latitude–(35°–60° N) mean land-based absolute temperature anomalies (a) and absolute precipitation anomalies (b), 1979–2012. The 40 months with the largest values are identified by circles and labelled on the lower x axis, and the green line shows the threshold value for extremes. c,d, Normalized wave amplitude anomalies, for wave numbers 3–8, during 40 months of mid-latitude–mean temperature extremes (c) and precipitation extremes (d). The months are labelled on the abscissa in order of decreasing extremity from left to right. Grey shading masks anomalies that are not statistically significant at the 90% confidence level; specifically, anomalies with magnitude smaller than 1.64σ, the critical value of a Gaussian (normal) distribution for a two-tailed probability p = 0.1. Red shading indicates wave numbers that are significantly amplified compared to average and blue shading indicates wave numbers that are significantly attenuated compared to average.

Observations.

Monthly-mean TL and PL from January 1979 to December 2012 were taken from the CRUTEM4 and GPCP v2.2 data sets, respectively. CRUTEM4 data27 are derived from in situ observations at meteorological stations. GPCP data28 are derived from a combination of in situ measurements and satellite estimates. For this study, GPCP data were re-gridded to the CRUTEM4 grid (5° by 5° longitude–latitude). The global-mean TL and PL have been subtracted from the grid-box values. This procedure removed global-mean variability and trends, but retained regional signatures such as those associated with planetary wave changes.

Extremes.

We derived TL and PL anomalies (denoted TL′ and PL′) by removing the relevant climatological monthly mean at each grid-box. Absolute values (that is, the modulus) of TL′ and PL′ (denoted |TL′| and |PL′|) are used to describe the magnitude of the anomalies irrespective of their sign. This is appropriate because planetary waves tend to induce positive temperature (and perhaps precipitation) anomalies at some longitudes and negative anomalies at other longitudes. Grid-point anomalies were area-averaged over eight geographical regions: mid-latitudes (ML; 35°–60° N, 180° E–180° W), western North America (wNAm; 35°–60° N, 115°–150° W), central North America (cNAm; 35°–60° N, 80°–115° W), eastern North America (eNAm; 35°–60° N, 45°–80° W), Europe (Euro; 35°–60° N, 25° E–15° W), western Asia (wAsia; 35°–60° N, 25°–65° E), central Asia (cAsia; 35°–60° N, 65°–105° E) and eastern Asia (eAsia; 35°–60° N, 105°–145° E). These regions (shown in Fig. 2) were chosen a priori based on conventional (sub-) continental boundaries, are approximately equal in area, and together cover all the mid-latitude landmasses. The area-averaged monthly time series were normalized by removing the climatological mean and dividing by the standard deviation for each calendar month. For each region, we then defined ‘extreme months’ as the 40 cases (approximately 10%) with largest |TL′| or |PL′|; and ‘near-average’ months as the 40 cases with smallest |TL′| or |PL′|. ‘Hot’, ‘cold’, ‘wet’ and ‘dry’ months are defined based on the 40 months with largest TL′, smallest TL′, largest PL′ and smallest PL′, respectively. The selected years are provided in Supplementary Discussion 6.

Wave amplitude.

We analyse amplitudes of planetary waves in the monthly-mean mid-tropospheric mid-latitude circulation, with zonal wave numbers 3–8. Amplitudes were defined based on Fourier analysis of 500 hPa geopotential heights (Z500), meridionally averaged over mid-latitudes (35°–60° N), as a function of longitude. Monthly-mean Z500 were taken from the ERA-Interim reanalysis29. This approach is consistent with the ‘zonal amplitude’ metric used in a previous study18, except here we use monthly-mean Z500 averaged over latitudes 35°–60° N rather than daily values at 45° N. Whereas multi-decadal trends in planetary-wave amplitude are sensitive to how amplitude is defined18, 20, month-to-month variability of amplitude is highly consistent using the two frameworks outlined in earlier work18. In this manuscript we exclusively consider amplitude variability (not trends) and, thus, use only one definition of planetary-wave amplitude.

Statistics.

Differences in sample means were assessed using an unequal variance t-test. This is an adaptation of the Student’s t-test that accounts for the two samples having different sizes and possibly unequal variances30. Differences in sample variance were assessed using a Fisher F-test. We tested against the null hypothesis that the two sample means or variances are equal. The null hypothesis was rejected if the probability of equal means or variances is less than 10% (p < 0.1).

  1. Coumou, D. & Rahmstorf, S. A decade of weather extremes. Nature Clim. Change 2, 491496 (2012).
  2. Rahmstorf, S. & Coumou, D. Increase of extreme events in a warming world. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 1790517909 (2011).
  3. Dole, R. et al. Was there a basis for anticipating the 2010 Russian heat wave? Geophys. Res. Lett. 38, L06702 (2011).
  4. Otto, F. E. L., Massey, N., van Oldenborgh, G. J., Jones, R. G. & Allen, M. R. Reconciling two approaches to attribution of the 2010 Russian heat wave. Geophys. Res. Lett. 39, L04702 (2012).
URL: http://www.nature.com/nclimate/journal/v4/n8/full/nclimate2271.html
Citation statistics:
资源类型: 期刊论文
标识符: http://119.78.100.158/handle/2HF3EXSE/5090
Appears in Collections:气候变化事实与影响
科学计划与规划
气候变化与战略

Files in This Item:
File Name/ File Size Content Type Version Access License
nclimate2271.pdf(524KB)期刊论文作者接受稿开放获取View Download

Recommended Citation:
James A. Screen. Amplified mid-latitude planetary waves favour particular regional weather extremes[J]. Nature Climate Change,2014-06-22,Volume:4:Pages:704;709 (2014).
Service
Recommend this item
Sava as my favorate item
Show this item's statistics
Export Endnote File
Google Scholar
Similar articles in Google Scholar
[James A. Screen]'s Articles
百度学术
Similar articles in Baidu Scholar
[James A. Screen]'s Articles
CSDL cross search
Similar articles in CSDL Cross Search
[James A. Screen]‘s Articles
Related Copyright Policies
Null
收藏/分享
文件名: nclimate2271.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF
此文件暂不支持浏览
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

Items in IR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.