globalchange  > 气候变化事实与影响
DOI: doi:10.1038/nclimate2244
论文题名:
Arctic shipping and marine invaders
作者: A. Whitman Miller
刊名: Nature Climate Change
ISSN: 1758-1282X
EISSN: 1758-7402
出版年: 2014-05-28
卷: Volume:4, 页码:Pages:413;416 (2014)
语种: 英语
英文关键词: Invasive species
英文摘要:

The emergence of new Arctic trade routes will probably change the global dynamics of invasive species, potentially affecting marine habitats and ecosystem functions, especially in coastal regions.

With striking reductions in Arctic sea-ice coverage in recent years1, 2, a long-anticipated opportunity for modern interocean shortcuts is being realized. The first commercial bulk carrier loaded with British Columbian coal successfully transited the Northwest Passage in September 20133. Perhaps more importantly, ships in larger numbers are already navigating the icy waters of Norway and Russia through the Northeastern Passage, also known as the northern sea route (NSR) — a 3,000 mile passage along Russia's northern coast that connects the Barents and Bering seas. The Russian Federation's Northern Sea Route Administration, which issues permits, provides icebreaker escort and regulates commercial ships traversing the NSR, is now open for business4, 5.

Among many potential environmental effects, the continued expansion of Arctic shipping will alter the risk of biological invasions in coastal ecosystems on both regional and global scales. Commercial ships are a dominant mechanism for the introduction of non-native marine species6, 7. A diverse range of organisms is unintentionally transferred in ballast tanks and on the hulls of ships8, 9, 10. A major shift in trade-routes will alter the current landscape of marine invasion dynamics, affecting the transfer, establishment and potential consequences of invasions.

There are two categories of commercial Arctic shipping: (1) trans-Arctic voyages, whereby ships use the Arctic as a thoroughfare for interocean passage; (2) destination shipping that moves goods to and from the Arctic (for example, import of oil extraction equipment and export of liquefied natural gas; LNG). Increased opportunity for invasions of the Arctic are an important concern, but trans-Arctic shipping will also change global commerce patterns significantly, connecting world ports and their biota in unprecedented ways. The melting of Arctic sea ice is connecting the North Pacific and North Atlantic oceans for the first time in several million years11. Although an ice-free Arctic provides a new interocean corridor for natural dispersal of marine biota across the region, it also represents a new route for long-distance transport of organisms by ships.

Ratification of the maritime delimitation and cooperation in the Barents Sea and the Arctic Ocean treaty, between Norway and Russia in 2011, has settled a decades-long dispute over territorial waters and opened a 175,000 km2 region of the Barents Sea and Arctic Ocean to oil and gas exploration12. This pivotal international agreement paves the way for less politically and legally complicated NSR passage while increasing the opportunity for shipping-related activities in petroleum-rich Arctic waters.

The volume of trans-Arctic shipping traffic is increasing rapidly. Using NSR shipping statistics5, we plotted annual transits for the 2009–2013 shipping seasons and fitted a growth curve (Fig. 1). In 2013, 71 vessels were reported to have made transit through the NSR, and at least 481 were issued permits to operate inside the NSR5. Although the current volume of NSR traffic is still meagre compared with other major shipping routes, it is expanding as quickly, with a projected average annual increase of 20% per year over the next 25 years. At this rate, an estimated 5,600 trans-Arctic transits per year could occur by the year 2040 through the NSR alone. Although this projection provides an initial base function, it will no doubt be strongly affected by three important economic factors: (1) the substantially shorter route between Asia and Europe than afforded by either the Suez or Panama canals; (2) increasing predictability, duration and safety of ice-free conditions; (3) the opportunity for exploration, extraction and exportation of the Arctic's natural resource reserves.

Figure 1: Annual transits of the Northern Sea Route (NSR) during the period 2009–2013.
Annual transits of the Northern Sea Route (NSR) during the period 2009-2013.

NSR transits are projected to increase by approximately 20% per year. The solid line is a fit to the data with an equation given by: transits = 1.5448 × (years since 2008)2.4068. The goodness-of-fit parameter is R2 = 0.92251. The inset is a map of the region showing the NSR (solid red line) and the Northwest Passage (dashed red line). Data taken from the Northern Seaway Information Office5.

The opportunity for ship-mediated invasions depends not only on the ports of call but also the particular voyage route or corridor, which affects both the environmental conditions experienced during a voyage and its duration. Most established marine invasions are from bays and estuaries, which are centres of shipping and other transport mechanisms. Just as species composition varies considerably across ports and the ships that visit them, the transit success (survivorship) and fate of organisms varies strongly by specific voyage route, which can act as a filter to limit associated diversity and abundance. In general, survivorship declines with increased voyage duration and with increasing mismatch or fluctuation of the environmental conditions (such as temperature or salinity) encountered during the journey from the source region to the destination.

Commercial ships follow established, dominant intra- and interoceanic trade routes that change over time, sometimes in precipitous fashion. Sudden shifts are perhaps most evident following the creation of interoceanic canals. On completion, the Suez and Panama canals instantly allowed ships to move between oceans, transporting goods among global regions more quickly and economically than ever before. The Suez Canal connects the Egyptian Ports of Said and Tawfiq in the Mediterranean and Red seas, providing passage for vessels moving between the Atlantic and Indian oceans. Before completion of the Suez Canal in 1869, ships sailing between Europe and Asia were forced to sail around South Africa's Cape of Good Hope. The Panama Canal opened in 1914 and connects the Pacific and Caribbean (and greater Atlantic) oceans, minimizing the distance and hazards associated with navigation around South America's Cape Horn.

The Suez and Panama canals rapidly altered the global transportation network and have been dominant corridors over the past century16. During the past decade, the average number of annual transits through the Panama Canal has been 12,846 ± 128 (mean ± standard error)17, roughly 71% that of the Suez Canal: 18,145 ± 534 (ref. 18). Although there was a significant drop in shipping through the Suez during 2008–2009, coincident with the onset of the global economic downturn, shipping through Panama has remained steady, probably because the canal has been operating at its capacity for many years (Fig. 2). These two canals altered the historical patterns of species transfers and are considered responsible for many invasions, due to both ship-mediated transport and natural dispersal19.

Figure 2: Annual transits of the Panama and Suez canals during the period 2003–2012.
Annual transits of the Panama and Suez canals during the period 2003-2012.

Data taken from Panama Canal and Suez Canal Authorities17, 18.

  1. National Snow and Ice Data Center; http://go.nature.com/lCFnMn
  2. IPCC Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis (eds Stocker, T. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013).
  3. McGarrity, J. & Gloystein, H. Northwest Passage crossed by first cargo ship, the Nordic Orion, heralding new era of Arctic commercial activity. National Post (27 September 2013); http://go.nature.com/jyN5dU
  4. Northern Sea Route Administration; http://www.nsra.ru
  5. Northern Sea Route Information Office; http://www.Arctic-lio.com/
  6. National Research Council Assessing the Relationship Between Propagule Pressure and Invasion Risk in Ballast Water (National Academy of Sciences, 2011).
  7. Ruiz, G. M., Fofonoff, P. W., Carlton, J. T., Wonham, M. J. & Hines, A. H. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Systemat. 31, 481531 (2000).
  8. Fofonoff, P. W., Ruiz, G. M., Steves, B. & Carlton, J. T. Invasive species: vectors and management strategies (Island Press, 2003).
  9. Carlton, J. T. & Geller, J. B. Science 261, 7882 (1993).
  10. Inglis, G. J. et al. The Biosecurity Risks Associated with Biofouling on International Vessels Arriving in New Zealand: Summary of the patterns and predictors of fouling (MAF Biosecurity New Zealand, 2010).
  11. Vermeij, G. J. & Roopnarine, P. D. Science 321, 780781 (2008).
  12. Amos, H. Arctic treaty with Norway opens fields. The Moscow Times (7 July 2011); http://go.nature.com/7j8U3v
  13. Gautier, D. L. et al. Science 324, 11751179 (2009).
  14. Topft, A. Greenland opens up rare earth mining opportunities. Rare Earth Investing News (28 Oct 2013); http://go.nature.com/Xp9IO3
  15. Ruiz, G. M. & Hewitt, C. L. Smithsonian at the poles: contributions to International Polar Year science (eds Krupnik, I., Lang, M. A. & Miller, S. E.) (Smithsonian Institution Scholarly Press, 2009).
  16. Kaluza, P., Kölzsch, A., Gastner, M. T. & Blasius, B. J. Roy. Soc. Interface 7, 10931103 (2010).
  17. Panama Canal Authority; http://go.nature.com/uWFSXr
  18. Suez Canal Authority; http://go.nature.com/FMbGnR
  19. Gollasch, S., Galil, B. S. & Cohen, A. N. in Bridging Divides: Maritime Canal and Invasion Corridors (eds Gollasch, S., Galil, B. S. & Cohen, A. N.) (Springer, 2006).
  20. Hamed, M. A., El-Sawy, M. A. & Abu El-Naga, E. H. Egypt. J. Aquat. Biol. Fish. 16, 112 (2012).
  21. Jongeling, T., Zijl, F. & Hulsbergen, R. Water quality model of Gatun Lake for expanded Panama Canal (WL Delft Hydraulics, 2009); http://go.nature.com/be1zsB
  22. Verling, E. et al. Proc. Roy. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 272, 12491257 (2005).
  23. Chan, F. T., Bailey, S. A., Wiley, C. J. & MacIsaac, H. J. Biological Invas. 15, 295308 (2013).
  24. Ware, C. et al. Divers. Distrib. 20, 1019 (2014).
  25. Christiansen, J. S., Mecklenburg, C. W. & Karamushko O. V. Glob. Change Biol. 20, 352359 (2014).

Download references

We dedicate this paper to Jim Carlton, who continues to inspire and advance a deeper understanding of the ecology, impact and management of invasions. We thank Mark Minton, Ian Davidson, Oliver Floerl, Richard Everett and Bella Galil for contributing ideas and materials.

Affiliations

  1. Smithsonian Environmental Research Center, 647 Contees Wharf Road, PO Box 28, Edgewater, Maryland 21037, USA

    • A. Whitman Miller &
    • Gregory M. Ruiz
URL: http://www.nature.com/nclimate/journal/v4/n6/full/nclimate2244.html
Citation statistics:
资源类型: 期刊论文
标识符: http://119.78.100.158/handle/2HF3EXSE/5105
Appears in Collections:气候变化事实与影响
科学计划与规划
气候变化与战略

Files in This Item:
File Name/ File Size Content Type Version Access License
nclimate2244.pdf(1135KB)期刊论文作者接受稿开放获取View Download

Recommended Citation:
A. Whitman Miller. Arctic shipping and marine invaders[J]. Nature Climate Change,2014-05-28,Volume:4:Pages:413;416 (2014).
Service
Recommend this item
Sava as my favorate item
Show this item's statistics
Export Endnote File
Google Scholar
Similar articles in Google Scholar
[A. Whitman Miller]'s Articles
百度学术
Similar articles in Baidu Scholar
[A. Whitman Miller]'s Articles
CSDL cross search
Similar articles in CSDL Cross Search
[A. Whitman Miller]‘s Articles
Related Copyright Policies
Null
收藏/分享
文件名: nclimate2244.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF
此文件暂不支持浏览
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

Items in IR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.