DOI: 10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00165.1
Scopus记录号: 2-s2.0-84878145822
论文题名: Reply to "comments on 'erroneous model field representations in multiple pseudoproxy studies: Corrections and implications"'
作者: Smerdon J.E. ; Kaplan A. ; Amrhein D.E.
刊名: Journal of Climate
ISSN: 8948755
出版年: 2013
卷: 26, 期: 10 起始页码: 3485
结束页码: 3486
语种: 英语
英文摘要: The commenters confirm the errors identified and discussed in Smerdon et al., which either invalidated or required the reinterpretation of quantitative results from pseudoproxy experiments presented or used in several earlier papers. These errors have a strong influence on the spatial skill assessments of climate field reconstructions (CFRs), despite their small impacts on skill statistics averaged over the Northern Hemisphere. On the basis of spatial performance and contrary to the claim by the commenters, the Regularized Expectation Maximization method using truncated total least squares (RegEM-TTLS) cannot be considered a preferred CFR technique. Moreover, distinctions between CFR methods in the context of the discussion in the original paper are immaterial. Continued investigations using accurately described and faithfully executed pseudoproxy experiments are critical for further evaluation and improvement of CFR methods. © 2013 American Meteorological Society. Citation statistics:
资源类型: 期刊论文
标识符: http://119.78.100.158/handle/2HF3EXSE/51913
Appears in Collections: 气候变化事实与影响
There are no files associated with this item.
作者单位: Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia University, Palisades, NY, United States; Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution Joint Program in Oceanography, Cambridge, MA, United States
Recommended Citation:
Smerdon J.E.,Kaplan A.,Amrhein D.E.. Reply to "comments on 'erroneous model field representations in multiple pseudoproxy studies: Corrections and implications"'[J]. Journal of Climate,2013-01-01,26(10)