globalchange  > 气候变化事实与影响
DOI: doi:10.1038/nclimate2110
论文题名:
Economic development and the carbon intensity of human well-being
作者: Andrew K. Jorgenson
刊名: Nature Climate Change
ISSN: 1758-1415X
EISSN: 1758-7535
出版年: 2014-02-23
卷: Volume:4, 页码:Pages:186;189 (2014)
语种: 英语
英文关键词: Socioeconomic scenarios ; Sociology ; Sustainability ; Climate-change mitigation
英文摘要:

Humans use fossil fuels in various activities tied to economic development, leading to increases in carbon emissions1, 2, 3, and economic development is widely recognized as a pathway to improving human well-being. Strategies for effective sustainability efforts require reducing the carbon intensity of human well-being (CIWB): the level of anthropogenic carbon emissions per unit of human well-being4, 5, 6, 7. Here I examine how the effect of economic development on CIWB has changed since 1970 for 106 countries in multiple regional samples throughout the world. I find that early in this time period, increased development led to a reduction in CIWB for nations in Africa, but in recent decades the relationship has changed, becoming less sustainable. For nations in Asia and South and Central America, I find that development increases CIWB, and increasingly so throughout the 40-year period of study. The effect of development on CIWB for nations in the combined regions of North America, Europe and Oceania has remained positive, relatively larger than in other regions, and stable through time. Although future economic growth will probably improve human well-being throughout the world8, this research suggests that it will also cost an increasing amount of carbon emissions.

The relationship between carbon emissions and economic development receives considerable attention in research across the social sciences9, with studies finding notable changes in the emissions and development relationship through time10, 11. Likewise, the relationship between human well-being and economic development is a foundational empirical question in public health research12. Although most research reveals strong associations between enhanced well-being and development, some studies find that the strength of the relationship weakens through time8. However, limited attention has been paid to the amount of anthropogenic carbon emissions generated per unit of well-being—that is, the CIWB, and how it might be impacted by economic development4, 5, 6, 13.

As important, most cross-national research on development and emissions or development and well-being overlooks differences in regional-level patterns and changes, and analyses of regional samples of nations are potentially important for scientific discovery. Such a level of aggregation allows for investigating broad-based relationships, while being situated within regional contexts14. For example, public health research shows that the effect of urban slum prevalence on child mortality varies greatly by region. This variation is unobserved if the analysis is conducted for all nations combined in one sample15. Similarly, longitudinal research shows that the estimated effect of population size on national-level carbon emissions differs greatly for nations in different regions, and the relationship changes through time in ways unique to each regional sample of nations16. These differences are overlooked if nations are not analysed in separate regionally defined groups.

There are significant policy implications for research that focuses on development and CIWB. As economic growth is a common objective of governments and international organizations, given its potential for improving well-being, understanding the relationship between development and CIWB is critical. If development leads to reductions in CIWB, the pursuit of economic growth will have the beneficial side effect of enhancing sustainability. However, if economic growth has little or no beneficial effect on CIWB, then climate change mitigation and other sustainability efforts will be successful only if policies that supplement growth promotion are enacted. If economic growth increases CIWB, then development policies may pose additional challenges for climate change mitigation and must be reconsidered or balanced with new approaches to counter these unintended environmental impacts.

In this study I use national-level panel data for the 1970–2009 period to quantify CIWB as a ratio between per capita anthropogenic carbon dioxide emissions (from fossil fuel combustion and cement manufacturing) and average life expectancy at birth. Using measures of gross domestic product (GDP) per capita (measured in constant 2000 US dollars, based on exchange rates), I employ statistical modelling techniques and interaction variables between GDP per capita and time to assess the extent to which the effect of economic development on CIWB changes through time. Fig. 1 graphs the CIWB measures for eight nations from different regions of the world for the 1970–2009 period, and Fig. 2 shows their GDP per capita measures. The eight nations are chosen to illustrate the diversity in levels and trajectories of national-level CIWB and economic development throughout the world, and the importance in assessing the relationship between them.

Figure 1: The CIWB for eight nations, 1970–2009.
The CIWB for eight nations, 1970-2009.

The CIWB measures are reported for the years 1970, 1975, 1980, 1985, 1990, 1995, 2000, 2005 and 2009.

I use country-level data obtained from the Word Bank 21. The data are annual observations measured in five-year increments from 1970 to 2005 as well as for the year 2009, the latter of which is the most recent year where adequate data are available to perform the analysis. I include nations where data are available for each of the study’s time points, allowing for perfectly balanced panels consisting of nine observations per country.

Perfectly balanced panels are ideal for the study’s research design, because interaction variables for GDP per capita and dummy variables for each yearly observation are employed to assess the extent to which the effect of development on CIWB might change through time10, 16, 17. Thus, it is preferred to have data for the same nations at each time point. An unintended consequence of this approach is the exclusion of nations where data are not available for each time point. Although the overall sample that is analysed accounts for most of the world’s population and the study covers a large time frame, future studies that focus on shorter and recent time periods could include additional nations, but at the expense of a more limited temporal scope22.

I employ anthropogenic carbon dioxide emissions per capita, measured in metric tons, as the numerator for CIWB. These data include emissions from the burning of fossil fuels and the manufacture of cement. They exclude emissions from land use. As noted in other studies on similar topics4, 7, future research that instead employs measures of carbon emissions from land use would offer additional insights on the relationship between economic development and CIWB. As various economic activities contribute to land-use change, such as deforestation in many developing nations14, 23, the analysis reported in this study, which excludes emissions from land use, might underestimate the effects of economic development on CIWB, especially in the regions with mostly developing nations.

Life expectancy at birth, the denominator for CIWB, indicates the average number of years a newborn infant would live if prevailing patterns of mortality at the time of its birth were to persist throughout its life. Although life expectancy is an appropriate, valid and reliable measure of human well-being, future work on CIWB could certainly employ other well-being measures.

In the overall data set the coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) for carbon emissions per capita is 1.489. For life expectancy the coefficient of variation is 0.180. The coefficients of variation indicate that the relative variation in per capita carbon emissions is substantially larger than the variation in life expectancy. Under such conditions the variation in the numerator could drive variation in the ratio. To resolve this complication I take the same approach as Dietz and colleagues4 and Jorgenson and colleagues22, which involves constraining the coefficient of variation for the numerator and denominator to be equal by adding a constant to one of them, shifting the mean without modifying the variance, thereby allowing for the equalization of the coefficient of variation for the two initial measures. The coefficients of variation for the two variables can be made equal (a value of 0.180) by adding 31.0 to the measures of carbon emissions. The measure of the CIWB is:

where CO2PC is carbon dioxide emissions per capita in metric tons and LE is average life expectancy in years. To scale the ratio, I multiply by 100 (refs 4, 22).

I use a Prais–Winsten regression model with panel-corrected standard errors, allowing for disturbances that are heteroskedastic and contemporaneously correlated across panels24. I control for both year-specific and country-specific effects, the equivalent of a two-way fixed-effects model. I also correct for AR(1) (that is, autoregressive) disturbances within panels, and I treat the AR(1) process as common to all panels24. All variables are transformed with the base 10 logarithm. Thus, the regression models estimate elasticity coefficients where the coefficient for an independent variable is the estimated net percentage change in the dependent variable associated with a 1% increase in the independent variable.

I estimate the same two-way fixed-effects elasticity model for each of the four samples of nations. The estimated model is as follows:

where the dependent variable, CIWBit, is the CIWB, and the model includes GDP per capita (β1GDPpercapitait), the period-specific intercepts (β2year1975t++β9year2009t), the interactions between GDP per capita and the dummy variables for each year (β10GDPpercapitait year1975t + + β18GDPpercapitait year2009t) where 1970 is the reference category, the country-specific intercepts (ui), and the disturbance term unique to each country at each point in time (eit). The ui intercepts control for potential unobserved heterogeneity that is temporally invariant within countries (country-specific intercepts), and the period-specific intercepts control for potential unobserved heterogeneity that is cross-sectionally invariant within periods. The coefficient for GDP per capita is the unit change in the dependent variable in 1970 for each unit increase in GDP per capita for the same year. The overall effect of GDP per capita for the other time points equals the sum of the coefficient for GDP per capita (that is, its effect in 1970) and the appropriate interaction term if the latter is statistically significant17.

  1. Podobnik, B. Global Energy Shifts: Fostering Sustainability in a Turbulent Age (Temple Univ. Press, (2006).
  2. IPCC Climate Change 2007: Mitigation of Climate Change Metz, B., Davidson, O. R., Bosch, P. R., Dave, R. & Meyer, L. A. (eds) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2007).
  3. United States National Research Council, Advancing the Science on Climate Change (National Academies Press, (2010).
  4. Dietz, T., Rosa, E. & York, R. Environmentally efficient well-being: Is there a Kuznets curve?. Appl. Geogr. 32, 2128 (2012).
  5. Dietz, T., Rosa, E. & York, R. Efficient well-being: Rethinking sustainability as the relationship between human well-being and environmental impacts. Human Ecol. Rev. 16, 114123 (2009).
  6. Knight, K. & Rosa, E. The environmental efficiency of well-being: A cross national analysis. Soc. Sci. Res. 40, 931949 (2011).
  7. Steinberger, J. & Roberts, J. T. From constraint to sufficiency: The decoupling of energy and carbon from human needs, 1975–2005. Ecol. Econom. 70, 425433 (2010).
  8. Brady, D., Kaya, Y. & Beckfield, J. Reassessing the effect of economic growth on well-being in less-developed countries, 1980–2003. Stud. Comparative Int. Dev. 42, 135 (2007).
  9. Rosa, E. & Dietz, T. Human drivers of national greenhouse-gas emissions. Nature Clim. Change 2, 581586 (2012).
  10. Jorgenson, A. K. & Clark, B. Are the economy and the environment decoupling? A comparative international study, 1960–2005. Am. J. Soc. 118, 144 (2012).
  11. York, R. Asymmetric effects of economic growth and decline on CO2 emissions. Nature Clim. Change 2, 762764 (2012).
  12. McMichael, P. Development and Social Change: A Global Perspective (Sage, 2012).
URL: http://www.nature.com/nclimate/journal/v4/n3/full/nclimate2110.html
Citation statistics:
资源类型: 期刊论文
标识符: http://119.78.100.158/handle/2HF3EXSE/5235
Appears in Collections:气候变化事实与影响
科学计划与规划
气候变化与战略

Files in This Item:
File Name/ File Size Content Type Version Access License
nclimate2110.pdf(434KB)期刊论文作者接受稿开放获取View Download

Recommended Citation:
Andrew K. Jorgenson. Economic development and the carbon intensity of human well-being[J]. Nature Climate Change,2014-02-23,Volume:4:Pages:186;189 (2014).
Service
Recommend this item
Sava as my favorate item
Show this item's statistics
Export Endnote File
Google Scholar
Similar articles in Google Scholar
[Andrew K. Jorgenson]'s Articles
百度学术
Similar articles in Baidu Scholar
[Andrew K. Jorgenson]'s Articles
CSDL cross search
Similar articles in CSDL Cross Search
[Andrew K. Jorgenson]‘s Articles
Related Copyright Policies
Null
收藏/分享
文件名: nclimate2110.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF
此文件暂不支持浏览
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

Items in IR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.