globalchange  > 影响、适应和脆弱性
DOI: 10.1111/gcb.12887
论文题名:
Trait-based analysis of decline in plant species ranges during the 20th century: A regional comparison between the UK and Estonia
作者: Laanisto L.; Sammul M.; Kull T.; Macek P.; Hutchings M.J.
刊名: Global Change Biology
ISSN: 13541013
出版年: 2015
卷: 21, 期:7
起始页码: 2726
结束页码: 2738
语种: 英语
英文关键词: Biodiversity loss ; Common species ; Comparative analysis ; Conservation ; Plant floras ; Traits ; Vegetation change
Scopus关键词: angiosperm ; biodiversity ; comparative study ; flora ; human activity ; population decline ; range size ; vegetation ; Estonia ; United Kingdom ; Orchidaceae ; Potamogetonaceae
英文摘要: Although the distribution ranges and abundance of many plant species have declined dramatically in recent decades, detailed analysis of these changes and their cause have only become possible following the publication of second- and third-generation national distribution atlases. Decline can now be compared both between species and in different parts of species' ranges. We extracted data from distribution atlases to compare range persistence of 736 plant species common to both the UK and Estonia between survey periods encompassing almost the same years (1969 and 1999 in the UK and 1970 and 2004 in Estonia). We determined which traits were most closely associated with variation in species persistence, whether these were the same in each country, and the extent to which they explained differences in persistence between the countries. Mean range size declined less in Estonia than in the UK (24.3% vs. 30.3%). One-third of species in Estonia (239) maintained >90% of their distribution range compared with one-fifth (141) in the UK. In Estonia, 99 species lost >50% of their range compared with 127 species in the UK. Persistence was very positively related to original range in both countries. Major differences in species persistence between the studied countries were primarily determined by biogeographic (affiliation to floristic element) and ecoevolutionary (plant strategy) factors. In contrast, within-country persistence was most strongly determined by tolerance of anthropogenic activities. Decline of species in the families Orchidaceae and Potamogetonaceae was significantly greater in the UK than in Estonia. Almost all of the 736 common and native European plant species in our study are currently declining in their range due to pressure from anthropogenic activities. Those species with low tolerance of human activity, with biotic pollination vectors and in the families referred to above are the most vulnerable, especially where human population density is high. © 2015 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Citation statistics:
资源类型: 期刊论文
标识符: http://119.78.100.158/handle/2HF3EXSE/61645
Appears in Collections:影响、适应和脆弱性

Files in This Item:

There are no files associated with this item.


作者单位: Institute of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Estonian University of Life Sciences, Kreutzwaldi 5, Tartu, Estonia; Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, Vanemuise 46, Tartu, Estonia; Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, Branišovská 31, České Budějovice, Czech Republic; School of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton, Sussex, United Kingdom

Recommended Citation:
Laanisto L.,Sammul M.,Kull T.,et al. Trait-based analysis of decline in plant species ranges during the 20th century: A regional comparison between the UK and Estonia[J]. Global Change Biology,2015-01-01,21(7)
Service
Recommend this item
Sava as my favorate item
Show this item's statistics
Export Endnote File
Google Scholar
Similar articles in Google Scholar
[Laanisto L.]'s Articles
[Sammul M.]'s Articles
[Kull T.]'s Articles
百度学术
Similar articles in Baidu Scholar
[Laanisto L.]'s Articles
[Sammul M.]'s Articles
[Kull T.]'s Articles
CSDL cross search
Similar articles in CSDL Cross Search
[Laanisto L.]‘s Articles
[Sammul M.]‘s Articles
[Kull T.]‘s Articles
Related Copyright Policies
Null
收藏/分享
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

Items in IR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.