globalchange  > 影响、适应和脆弱性
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2017.01.013
Scopus记录号: 2-s2.0-85010457865
论文题名:
Borrowed plant defences: Deterring browsers using a forestry by-product
作者: Stutz R.S.; Croak B.M.; Leimar O.; Bergvall U.A.
刊名: Forest Ecology and Management
ISSN:  0378-1127
出版年: 2017
卷: 390
起始页码: 1
结束页码: 7
语种: 英语
英文关键词: Associational plant effect ; Deer ; Foraging ; Forestry ; Plant defence ; Repellent
Scopus关键词: Animals ; Byproducts ; Forestry ; Mammals ; Timber ; Vegetation ; Associational plant effect ; Deer ; Foraging ; Plant defence ; Repellent ; Seed ; browsing ; captive population ; coniferous tree ; deer ; foliage ; forestry ; herbivore ; plant defense ; plant extract ; plant-herbivore interaction ; repellent ; seedling ; Alces alces ; Animalia ; Cervidae ; Cervus elaphus ; Mammalia ; Pinus sylvestris
英文摘要: Mammalian browsers can cause ecologically and economically significant damage to important tree species, particularly at the vulnerable seedling stage. Some tree species or particular parts of trees are less preferred as a result of chemical defences – harnessing such defences could reduce the appeal of more preferred trees and thus their loss to browsing. We tested the potential of birch bark extract, a forestry by-product, to protect seedlings of Scots pine Pinus sylvestris from two globally significant browsers: moose Alces alces and red deer Cervus elaphus. We quantified the responses by captive animals to extract application as a function of both the distance between seedlings and whether the extract was applied to all or alternate seedlings. Both moose and red deer consumed pine seedlings less frequently when seedlings were treated with birch bark extract, but their responses differed when only alternate seedlings were treated. At inter-seedling distances equivalent to those used in forestry, red deer browsed untreated seedlings more frequently when alternate seedlings were treated than when none were treated (associational susceptibility), whereas moose browsed untreated seedlings less frequently with treated than untreated neighbours (associational refuge). These neighbourhood effects were not evident at inter-seedling distances three times larger or smaller than those used in forestry. There was also no significant difference in the frequency of browsing on treated seedlings in alternate compared to completely treated arrangements at any inter-seedling distance. Red deer removed significantly less foliage from treated than untreated seedlings once browsed. Browsing by moose followed a similar but non-significant trend. The relative number of untreated to treated seedlings browsed was 2:1 for red deer and 4:1 for moose. Red deer used a finer scale of selection than moose for choosing between seedlings, consistent with their smaller body mass. However, the coarser-scale of selection used by moose resulted in consumption of more untreated relative to treated seedlings. Our study highlights the potential of existing plant defensive chemistry, harvested from forestry by-products, to reduce herbivore damage to tree seedlings. We also demonstrate the need to consider both plant associational effects and the foraging strategies of the dominant herbivores in applying repellents. © 2017 Elsevier B.V.
Citation statistics:
资源类型: 期刊论文
标识符: http://119.78.100.158/handle/2HF3EXSE/64446
Appears in Collections:影响、适应和脆弱性

Files in This Item:

There are no files associated with this item.


作者单位: Department of Zoology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden

Recommended Citation:
Stutz R.S.,Croak B.M.,Leimar O.,et al. Borrowed plant defences: Deterring browsers using a forestry by-product[J]. Forest Ecology and Management,2017-01-01,390
Service
Recommend this item
Sava as my favorate item
Show this item's statistics
Export Endnote File
Google Scholar
Similar articles in Google Scholar
[Stutz R.S.]'s Articles
[Croak B.M.]'s Articles
[Leimar O.]'s Articles
百度学术
Similar articles in Baidu Scholar
[Stutz R.S.]'s Articles
[Croak B.M.]'s Articles
[Leimar O.]'s Articles
CSDL cross search
Similar articles in CSDL Cross Search
[Stutz R.S.]‘s Articles
[Croak B.M.]‘s Articles
[Leimar O.]‘s Articles
Related Copyright Policies
Null
收藏/分享
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

Items in IR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.