globalchange  > 影响、适应和脆弱性
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2016.08.018
Scopus记录号: 2-s2.0-84988014756
论文题名:
Inundative pest control: How risky is it? A case study using entomopathogenic nematodes in a forest ecosystem
作者: Harvey C.D.; Williams C.D.; Dillon A.B.; Griffin C.T.
刊名: Forest Ecology and Management
ISSN:  0378-1127
出版年: 2016
卷: 380
起始页码: 242
结束页码: 251
语种: 英语
英文关键词: Entomopathogenic nematodes ; Forestry ; Inundative biological control ; Pine weevil ; Risk assessment
Scopus关键词: Animals ; Ecology ; Ecosystems ; Forestry ; Insect control ; Pest control ; Risk analysis ; Biological control agent ; Biological controls ; Entomopathogenic nematode ; Environmental risk assessment ; Neonicotinoid insecticides ; Pine weevil ; Quantitative evaluation ; Steinernema carpocapsae ; Risk assessment ; biocontrol agent ; biological control ; entomopathogenic organism ; environmental risk ; forest ecosystem ; native species ; nematode ; neonicotinoid pesticide ; nontarget organism ; pest control ; pyrethroid ; risk assessment ; Heterorhabditis downesi ; Hylobius abietis ; Nematoda ; Steinernema carpocapsae ; Steinernema feltiae
英文摘要: Entomopathogenic nematodes (EPN) are globally important inundative biological control agents. Their widespread use makes environmental risk assessment important, but very few comprehensive post-application risk assessments have been conducted for EPN. We apply a rigorous risk analysis procedure to the use of EPN applied in a forest ecosystem to suppress the large pine weevil (Hylobius abietis). In this synthesis, we provide a quantitative evaluation of five risk categories: (a) establishment, (b) dispersal, (c) host range, (d) direct non-target effects and (e) indirect non-target effects. A low level of risk was identified (35–51 out of a possible total of 125). Species exotic to the clear-fell forest ecosystem (Steinernema carpocapsae and Heterorhabditis downesi) were accorded a lower overall risk status than native species and strains (Steinernema feltiae), largely as a result of their shorter persistence in the target environment. We conclude that EPN are a low risk viable alternative control for pine weevil compared to the higher risk conventional control using pyrethroid or neonicotinoid insecticides. © 2016 Elsevier B.V.
Citation statistics:
资源类型: 期刊论文
标识符: http://119.78.100.158/handle/2HF3EXSE/64700
Appears in Collections:影响、适应和脆弱性

Files in This Item:

There are no files associated with this item.


作者单位: Department of Biology, Maynooth University, Maynooth, County Kildare, Ireland; School of Natural Sciences and Psychology, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, United Kingdom; Coillte, Dublin Road, Newtownmountkennedy, County Wicklow, Ireland; Exosect Ltd, Colden Common, Winchester, Hampshire, United Kingdom

Recommended Citation:
Harvey C.D.,Williams C.D.,Dillon A.B.,et al. Inundative pest control: How risky is it? A case study using entomopathogenic nematodes in a forest ecosystem[J]. Forest Ecology and Management,2016-01-01,380
Service
Recommend this item
Sava as my favorate item
Show this item's statistics
Export Endnote File
Google Scholar
Similar articles in Google Scholar
[Harvey C.D.]'s Articles
[Williams C.D.]'s Articles
[Dillon A.B.]'s Articles
百度学术
Similar articles in Baidu Scholar
[Harvey C.D.]'s Articles
[Williams C.D.]'s Articles
[Dillon A.B.]'s Articles
CSDL cross search
Similar articles in CSDL Cross Search
[Harvey C.D.]‘s Articles
[Williams C.D.]‘s Articles
[Dillon A.B.]‘s Articles
Related Copyright Policies
Null
收藏/分享
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

Items in IR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.