DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2016.08.018
Scopus记录号: 2-s2.0-84988014756
论文题名: Inundative pest control: How risky is it? A case study using entomopathogenic nematodes in a forest ecosystem
作者: Harvey C.D. ; Williams C.D. ; Dillon A.B. ; Griffin C.T.
刊名: Forest Ecology and Management
ISSN: 0378-1127
出版年: 2016
卷: 380 起始页码: 242
结束页码: 251
语种: 英语
英文关键词: Entomopathogenic nematodes
; Forestry
; Inundative biological control
; Pine weevil
; Risk assessment
Scopus关键词: Animals
; Ecology
; Ecosystems
; Forestry
; Insect control
; Pest control
; Risk analysis
; Biological control agent
; Biological controls
; Entomopathogenic nematode
; Environmental risk assessment
; Neonicotinoid insecticides
; Pine weevil
; Quantitative evaluation
; Steinernema carpocapsae
; Risk assessment
; biocontrol agent
; biological control
; entomopathogenic organism
; environmental risk
; forest ecosystem
; native species
; nematode
; neonicotinoid pesticide
; nontarget organism
; pest control
; pyrethroid
; risk assessment
; Heterorhabditis downesi
; Hylobius abietis
; Nematoda
; Steinernema carpocapsae
; Steinernema feltiae
英文摘要: Entomopathogenic nematodes (EPN) are globally important inundative biological control agents. Their widespread use makes environmental risk assessment important, but very few comprehensive post-application risk assessments have been conducted for EPN. We apply a rigorous risk analysis procedure to the use of EPN applied in a forest ecosystem to suppress the large pine weevil (Hylobius abietis). In this synthesis, we provide a quantitative evaluation of five risk categories: (a) establishment, (b) dispersal, (c) host range, (d) direct non-target effects and (e) indirect non-target effects. A low level of risk was identified (35–51 out of a possible total of 125). Species exotic to the clear-fell forest ecosystem (Steinernema carpocapsae and Heterorhabditis downesi) were accorded a lower overall risk status than native species and strains (Steinernema feltiae), largely as a result of their shorter persistence in the target environment. We conclude that EPN are a low risk viable alternative control for pine weevil compared to the higher risk conventional control using pyrethroid or neonicotinoid insecticides. © 2016 Elsevier B.V.
Citation statistics:
资源类型: 期刊论文
标识符: http://119.78.100.158/handle/2HF3EXSE/64700
Appears in Collections: 影响、适应和脆弱性
There are no files associated with this item.
作者单位: Department of Biology, Maynooth University, Maynooth, County Kildare, Ireland; School of Natural Sciences and Psychology, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, United Kingdom; Coillte, Dublin Road, Newtownmountkennedy, County Wicklow, Ireland; Exosect Ltd, Colden Common, Winchester, Hampshire, United Kingdom
Recommended Citation:
Harvey C.D.,Williams C.D.,Dillon A.B.,et al. Inundative pest control: How risky is it? A case study using entomopathogenic nematodes in a forest ecosystem[J]. Forest Ecology and Management,2016-01-01,380