globalchange  > 影响、适应和脆弱性
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2016.05.031
Scopus记录号: 2-s2.0-84976574940
论文题名:
Tamm Review: Light use efficiency and carbon storage in nutrient and water experiments on major forest plantation species
作者: Albaugh T.J.; Albaugh J.M.; Fox T.R.; Allen H.L.; Rubilar R.A.; Trichet P.; Loustau D.; Linder S.
刊名: Forest Ecology and Management
ISSN:  0378-1127
出版年: 2016
卷: 376
起始页码: 333
结束页码: 342
语种: 英语
英文关键词: Carbon ; Growth efficiency ; Nutrient optimization ; Potential productivity
Scopus关键词: Carbon ; Carbon dioxide ; Digital storage ; Efficiency ; Irrigation ; Nutrients ; Plants (botany) ; Population statistics ; Biomass productions ; Eucalyptus globulus ; Eucalyptus grandis ; Growth efficiency ; Irrigation treatments ; Light use efficiency ; Nutrient optimization ; Potential productivity ; Forestry ; aboveground biomass ; carbon sequestration ; coniferous forest ; evergreen forest ; experimental study ; growth response ; irrigation system ; light use efficiency ; nutrient dynamics ; optimization ; plantation forestry ; primary production ; Australia ; Brazil ; France ; Georgia ; Hawaii [United States] ; North Carolina ; Portugal ; South Africa ; Sweden ; United States ; Eucalyptus ; Eucalyptus globulus ; Eucalyptus grandis ; Eucalyptus saligna ; Picea abies ; Pinus pinaster ; Pinus radiata ; Pinus taeda
英文摘要: We used published data from nine sites where nutrient and water optimization studies had been installed in a 2 × 2 factorial design to determine maximum biomass production in response to a simple set of treatments. We tested for site and treatment effects on the relationships between stem, aboveground (stem, branches, foliage) and total (aboveground + roots) biomass production versus intercepted light (light use efficiency, LUE). We also estimated the additional carbon stored as a result of treatment. The sites were located in Australia (Pinus radiata), Brazil (Eucalyptus grandis × urophylla), France (Pinus pinaster), the United States in Georgia and North Carolina (Pinus taeda) and Hawaii (Eucalyptus saligna), Portugal (Eucalyptus globulus), South Africa (E. grandis), and Sweden (Picea abies). We hypothesized that site, treatment and their interaction would significantly affect LUE; however, we rejected our hypothesis because stem, aboveground and total LUE were not affected by site or treatment. The stem, aboveground and total LUE values were 1.21, 1.51, and 0.85 g MJ−1, respectively. The total LUE value was lower than that for stem and aboveground LUE because a different population was used for the analysis (only five of the nine sites had total production data), and the total LUE relationship had a zero intercept whereas the stem and aboveground LUE relationships had a negative intercept. The average amount of additional carbon that would be stored by the irrigation, fertilization, and fertilization plus irrigation treatments was 3.9, 6.8 and 13.4 Mg CO2 equivalents ha−1 yr−1, respectively. These additional carbon storage estimates, based on these research studies with annual nutrient and water applications, were similar to results obtained in operational settings with less intensive nutrient applications. © 2016 Elsevier B.V.
Citation statistics:
资源类型: 期刊论文
标识符: http://119.78.100.158/handle/2HF3EXSE/64820
Appears in Collections:影响、适应和脆弱性

Files in This Item:

There are no files associated with this item.


作者单位: Virginia Tech Department of Forest Resources and Environmental Conservation, 228 Cheatham Hall, Blacksburg, VA, United States; JMA Consulting, Hillsborough, NC, United States; ProFor Consulting, CaryNC, United States; Cooperativa de Productividad Forestal, Facultad de Ciencias Forestales, Universidad de Concepción, Victoria 631, Casilla 160-C, Concepción, Chile; INRA, UMR ISPA, F-33140 Villenave d'Ornon, France; Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), Southern Sweden Forest Research Center, SE-230 53 Alnarp, Sweden

Recommended Citation:
Albaugh T.J.,Albaugh J.M.,Fox T.R.,et al. Tamm Review: Light use efficiency and carbon storage in nutrient and water experiments on major forest plantation species[J]. Forest Ecology and Management,2016-01-01,376
Service
Recommend this item
Sava as my favorate item
Show this item's statistics
Export Endnote File
Google Scholar
Similar articles in Google Scholar
[Albaugh T.J.]'s Articles
[Albaugh J.M.]'s Articles
[Fox T.R.]'s Articles
百度学术
Similar articles in Baidu Scholar
[Albaugh T.J.]'s Articles
[Albaugh J.M.]'s Articles
[Fox T.R.]'s Articles
CSDL cross search
Similar articles in CSDL Cross Search
[Albaugh T.J.]‘s Articles
[Albaugh J.M.]‘s Articles
[Fox T.R.]‘s Articles
Related Copyright Policies
Null
收藏/分享
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

Items in IR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.