DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2016.02.008
论文题名: Quantifying Differences Between Native and Introduced Species
作者: Lemoine N.P. ; Burkepile D.E. ; Parker J.D.
刊名: Trends in Ecology and Evolution
ISSN: 1695347
出版年: 2016
卷: 31, 期: 5 起始页码: 372
结束页码: 381
语种: 英语
英文关键词: Bayesian model
; Community assembly
; Invasion biology
; Null model
Scopus关键词: assembly rule
; Bayesian analysis
; ecological theory
; evolutionary biology
; introduced species
; life history trait
; native species
; natural enemy
; numerical model
; population size
英文摘要: Introduced species have historically been presumed to be evolutionarily novel and 'different' from native species. Recent studies question these assumptions, however, as the traits and factors promoting successful introduced and native species can be similar. We advocate a novel statistical framework utilizing quantifiable metrics of evolutionary and ecological differences among species to test whether different forces govern the success of native versus introduced species. In two case studies, we show that native and introduced species appear to follow the same 'rules' for becoming abundant. We propose that incorporating quantitative differences in traits and evolutionary history among species might largely account for many perceived effects of geographic origin, leading to more rigorous and general tests of the factors promoting organism success. Geographic origin is thought to be an important predictor of species performance because introduced species are often more abundant, lack natural enemies, possess novel defenses, and have unique evolutionary histories compared with native species.However, recent evidence suggests that many introduced species perform similarly in their native and introduced ranges, and many native species can exhibit 'invasive' behavior when freed from constraints on population size. These findings suggest that native and introduced species may abide by similar rules of community assembly.We suggest that geographic origin provides little information once trait and evolutionary similarity have been accounted for statistically, and that only community-level tests of performance provide an adequate test of invasion hypotheses. © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. Citation statistics:
资源类型: 期刊论文
标识符: http://119.78.100.158/handle/2HF3EXSE/67063
Appears in Collections: 全球变化的国际研究计划 气候变化与战略
There are no files associated with this item.
作者单位: Department of Biology, Graduate Degree Program in Ecology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, United States; Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, United States; Smithsonian Environmental Research Center, 647 Contees Wharf Road, Edgewater, MD, United States
Recommended Citation:
Lemoine N.P.,Burkepile D.E.,Parker J.D.. Quantifying Differences Between Native and Introduced Species[J]. Trends in Ecology and Evolution,2016-01-01,31(5)