DOI: 10.1002/wcc.425
Scopus记录号: 2-s2.0-84993938770
论文题名: Envisioning REDD+ in a post-Paris era: between evolving expectations and current practice
作者: Turnhout E ; , Gupta A ; , Weatherley-Singh J ; , Vijge M ; J ; , de Koning J ; , Visseren-Hamakers I ; J ; , Herold M ; , Lederer M
刊名: Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change
ISSN: 17577780
出版年: 2017
卷: 8, 期: 1 语种: 英语
英文关键词: Biodiversity
; Climate change
; Deforestation
; Developing countries
; Economic and social effects
; Land use
; Building blockes
; Carbon emissions
; Climate mitigations
; Current practices
; Financing mechanisms
; Global climate changes
; Sustainable land use
; Tropical forest
; Forestry
; carbon emission
; deforestation
; developing world
; emission control
; environmental policy
; governance approach
; policy analysis
; pollution tax
; sustainability
; tropical forest
英文摘要: From its advent in 2005 within global climate change negotiations, reducing carbon emissions from deforestation and other forest-related activities (so-called REDD+) has been experimented with in developing country contexts for over a decade now, with a wide array of expectations coming to be associated with it. Three consecutive conceptualizations are identifiable: carbon-centered, where REDD+ is primarily a climate mitigation strategy; co-benefits-centered, where REDD+ becomes a triple win solution for climate, biodiversity and communities; and landscape-centered, where REDD+ activities are embedded in integrated sustainable land-use approaches. In assessing such evolving expectations against existing REDD+ experiences, a mixed picture emerges. Some expectations, specifically relating to forest carbon financing, are not being adequately met, while others, notably the delivery of co-benefits, hold out more promise. Yet this also highlights a potential paradox facing REDD+. While there is growing recognition that co-benefit generation is key, and that piece-meal, forest-carbon focused REDD+ interventions are unlikely to address the complex causes of tropical forest loss, forest carbon is still being foregrounded in measuring and reporting on REDD+ performance, and in generating results-based payments (even as these aspects remain challenging). This implies, however, that the future of REDD+ may lie not in one conceptualization coming to dominate, but rather in co-existence of heterogeneous practices. REDD+ may end up as a patchwork of projects and practices with different foci and financing mechanisms. Although this cannot prevent trade-offs, such a heterodox REDD+ may provide building blocks for the polycentric governance of the world's remaining tropical forests. WIREs Clim Change 2017, 8:e425. doi: 10.1002/wcc.425. For further resources related to this article, please visit the WIREs website. © 2016 The Authors. WIREs Climate Change published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Citation statistics:
资源类型: 期刊论文
标识符: http://119.78.100.158/handle/2HF3EXSE/76193
Appears in Collections: 影响、适应和脆弱性 气候变化与战略
There are no files associated with this item.
作者单位: Forest and Nature Conservation Policy Group, Wageningen University, Wageningen, Netherlands; Environmental Policy Group, Wageningen University, Wageningen, Netherlands; Wildlife Conservation Society (WCS), Brussels, Belgium; Laboratory of Geo Information and Remote Sensing, Wageningen University, Wageningen, Netherlands; Department of Environmental Science and Policy, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, United States; Institut für Politikwissenschaft, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Munster, Germany
Recommended Citation:
Turnhout E,, Gupta A,, Weatherley-Singh J,et al. Envisioning REDD+ in a post-Paris era: between evolving expectations and current practice[J]. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change,2017-01-01,8(1)