| DOI: | 10.1002/wcc.421
|
| Scopus记录号: | 2-s2.0-84979517985
|
| 论文题名: | Re-framing the climate change debate in the livestock sector: mitigation and adaptation options |
| 作者: | Rivera-Ferre M; G; , López-i-Gelats F; , Howden M; , Smith P; , Morton J; F; , Herrero M
|
| 刊名: | Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change
|
| ISSN: | 17577780
|
| 出版年: | 2016
|
| 卷: | 7, 期:6 | | 起始页码: | 869
|
| 结束页码: | 892
|
| 语种: | 英语
|
| 英文关键词: | Agriculture
; Crops
; Food supply
; Greenhouse gases
; Differing functions
; Food security
; Food sources
; Human system
; Intergovernmental panel on climate changes
; Livestock farming
; Livestock systems
; Win-win strategies
; Climate change
; adaptive management
; climate change
; food security
; Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
; livestock farming
|
| 英文摘要: | Livestock play a key role in the climate change debate. As with crop-based agriculture, the sector is both a net greenhouse gas emitter and vulnerable to climate change. At the same time, it is an essential food source for millions of people worldwide, with other functions apart from food security such as savings and insurance. By comparison with crop-based agriculture, the interactions of livestock and climate change have been much less studied. The debate around livestock is confusing due to the coexistence of multiple livestock farming systems with differing functions for humans, greenhouse gas (GHG) emission profiles and different characteristics and boundary issues in their measurement, which are often pooled together. Consequently, the diversity of livestock farming systems and their functions to human systems are poorly represented and the role of the livestock sector in the climate change debate has not been adequately addressed. In this article, building upon the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Fifth Assessment Report (IPCC 5AR) findings, we review recent literature on livestock and climate change so as better to include this diversity in the adaptation and mitigation debate around livestock systems. For comparative purposes we use the same categories of managerial, technical, behavioral and policy-related action to organize both mitigation and adaptation options. We conclude that different livestock systems provide different functions to different human systems and require different strategies, so they cannot readily be pooled together. We also observe that, for the different livestock systems, several win-win strategies exist that effectively tackle both mitigation and adaptation options as well as food security. WIREs Clim Change 2016, 7:869–892. doi: 10.1002/wcc.421. For further resources related to this article, please visit the WIREs website. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. |
| Citation statistics: |
|
| 资源类型: | 期刊论文
|
| 标识符: | http://119.78.100.158/handle/2HF3EXSE/76200
|
| Appears in Collections: | 影响、适应和脆弱性
气候变化与战略
|
|
There are no files associated with this item.
|
|
作者单位: | Chair of Agroecology and Food Systems, Faculty of Sciences and Technology, University of Vic-Central University of Catalonia, Barcelona, Spain
|
| Recommended Citation: | |
Rivera-Ferre M,G,, López-i-Gelats F,et al. Re-framing the climate change debate in the livestock sector: mitigation and adaptation options[J]. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change,2016-01-01,7(6)
|
|
|