DOI: 10.1002/wcc.333
Scopus记录号: 2-s2.0-84922611158
论文题名: Dual high-stake emerging technologies: A review of the climate engineering research literature
作者: Linnér B ; -O ; , Wibeck V
刊名: Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change
ISSN: 17577780
出版年: 2015
卷: 6, 期: 2 起始页码: 255
结束页码: 268
语种: 英语
英文关键词: Carbon
; Carbon dioxide
; Environmental impact
; Environmental regulations
; Pollution control
; Carbon dioxide removal
; Emerging technologies
; Literature reviews
; Potential methods
; Public engagement
; Radiation management
; Temporal and spatial scale
; Various technologies
; Climate change
; carbon dioxide
; climate change
; environmental impact
; literature review
; nanotechnology
; pollutant removal
; solar radiation
; spatiotemporal analysis
英文摘要: The literature on climate engineering, or geoengineering, covers a wide range of potential methods for solar radiation management or carbon dioxide removal that vary in technical aspects, temporal and spatial scales, potential environmental impacts, and legal, ethical, and governance challenges. This paper presents a comprehensive review of social and natural science papers on this topic since 2006 and listed in SCOPUS and Web of Science. It adds to previous literature reviews by combining analyses of bibliometric patterns and of trends in how the technologies are framed in terms of content, motivations, stakes, and recommendations. Most peer-reviewed climate engineering literature does not weigh the risks and new, additional, benefits of the various technologies, but emphasizes either the potential dangers of climate engineering or the climate change consequences of refraining from considering the research, development, demonstration, and/or deployment of climate engineering technologies. To analyse this polarity, not prevalent in the literature on earlier emerging technologies, we explore the concept of dual high-stake technologies. As appeals to fear have proven ineffective in spurring public engagement in climate change, we may not expect significant public support for climate engineering technologies whose rationale is not to achieve benefits in addition to avoiding the high stakes of climate change. Furthermore, in designing public engagement exercises, researchers must be careful not to steer discussions by emphasizing one type of stake framing over another. A dual high-stake, rather than risk-benefit, framing should also be considered in analysing some emerging technologies with similar characteristics, for example, nanotechnology for pollution control. © 2015 The Authors. WIREs Climate Change published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Citation statistics:
资源类型: 期刊论文
标识符: http://119.78.100.158/handle/2HF3EXSE/76284
Appears in Collections: 影响、适应和脆弱性 气候变化与战略
There are no files associated with this item.
作者单位: Centre for Climate Science and Policy Research, Department of Thematic Studies - Environmental Change, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
Recommended Citation:
Linnér B,-O,, Wibeck V. Dual high-stake emerging technologies: A review of the climate engineering research literature[J]. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change,2015-01-01,6(2)