DOI: | 10.1002/wcc.68
|
Scopus记录号: | 2-s2.0-79956268741
|
论文题名: | Panacea or paradox? Cross-sector partnerships, climate change, and development |
作者: | Forsyth T
|
刊名: | Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change
|
ISSN: | 17577780
|
出版年: | 2010
|
卷: | 1, 期:5 | 起始页码: | 683
|
结束页码: | 696
|
语种: | 英语
|
英文关键词: | Developing countries
; Mergers and acquisitions
; Technology transfer
; Advocacy coalitions
; Climate change mitigation
; Climate change policies
; Contractual obligations
; Forest governance
; Institutional design
; Local adaptive capacities
; Social inclusion
; Climate change
|
英文摘要: | Cross-sector partnerships between representatives of state, private business, and civil society are widely proposed as means to involve non-state actors in public policy. Yet, critics have argued partnerships contain paradoxes that prevent effective regulation or social inclusion. This paper reviews these debates and applies them to climate change policy in developing countries, and especially technology transfer and forest governance. The paper argues that debate about partnerships needs to move from rhetoric to identifying institutional designs that maximize contractual obligations and enhance local deliberation. But enhancing deliberation also implies looking at how partnerships reflect, rather than create, wider norms and advocacy coalitions, and by creating standardized means of collaboration such as free and prior informed consent. Rethinking partnerships in these ways not only accelerates climate change mitigation but also builds local adaptive capacity. © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
Citation statistics: |
|
资源类型: | 期刊论文
|
标识符: | http://119.78.100.158/handle/2HF3EXSE/76530
|
Appears in Collections: | 影响、适应和脆弱性 气候变化与战略
|
There are no files associated with this item.
|
作者单位: | Development Studies Institute, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, WC2A 2AE, United Kingdom
|
Recommended Citation: |
Forsyth T. Panacea or paradox? Cross-sector partnerships, climate change, and development[J]. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change,2010-01-01,1(5)
|
|
|